Started By
Message
locked post

The main reason that OSU will be the new BCS #2 tonight.

Posted on 12/4/11 at 11:58 am
Posted by purple passion
Feliciana Hills
Member since Nov 2006
666 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 11:58 am
A rematch between 2 teams from the same conference for the BCS Championship is fine, as long as it is virtually inarguable that the team that did not win that conference's championship is the only reasonable choice to be ranked in the #2 slot by the voters in the final BCS polls.

That would have been the case, had OKLA beat Okie State last night, as all the pundits expected.

But after the beatdown of the Sooners by the Cowboys, there is now an alternate #2 team to select, and a rematch is no longer the only reasonable course of action.

The majority of the voters will avoid a rematch, when offered another reasonable choice.

Okie State played their way into the BCS Title Game last night, and a majority of the voters will reward them.

It is actually a much easier choice than voting for a single-conference title game.

But until Okie State shocked OKLA, the pundits and the national TV audience last night, the BCS voters had no reasonable alternative to an LSU-Bama rematch.

Congrats to the Cowboys!

See y'all in New Orleans.
Posted by StormTiger
Norwich, England, but from TX
Member since Dec 2003
4892 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:00 pm to
you realize the opinions dont mean shite at this point, unless you are LSUmatt and understand the stats there is no point in posting this stuff..
Posted by LSU1NSEC
Member since Sep 2007
17243 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:00 pm to
LSU v OSU - will prove something
LSU v Bama 2 - will prove nothing
Posted by 70739tigah
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
1367 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:00 pm to
i agree with this.
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
50209 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:04 pm to
The media always gets its way.

Bama vs LSU.
Posted by Weaver
Madisonville, LA
Member since Nov 2005
27720 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:06 pm to
Espn disagrees, per herbstreet, musburger, nessler and that dipshit qb from Penn state
Posted by RazaBlade
Member since Sep 2004
191 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

unless you are LSUmatt and understand the stats


So what your saying is, everyone that works at BCS headquarters must be LSUmatt?
Posted by Polar Bear
Member since Oct 2009
1800 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:08 pm to
Alabama is already in.
Posted by White Tiger
Dallas
Member since Jul 2007
12830 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:08 pm to
Wow. What a needlessly ugly post.

Posted by tiger1014
Member since Jan 2011
12508 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

So what your saying is, everyone that works at BCS headquarters must be LSUmatt?


LSUmatt provides analysis on numbers.

This person just said "Oh i know the voters will choose osu, when 2/2 polls released, NEITHER have chosen osu"
Posted by tigerprl
DFW
Member since Dec 2010
1278 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:09 pm to
makes sense, is very reasonable,
that's why won't happen this process is flawed.
bama and okie play off in sugar bowl then winner takes on tigers next week for championship game.that would settle dispute of course won't happen.
Posted by amarti9
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2008
1060 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:09 pm to
Im sorry. But I dont agree with this whole conference championship thing.

The purpose of the BCS is to put the 2 BEST TEAMS in the NC game.

In my mind thats Bama and LSU.

Ive asked this question over and over again the last couple of weeks and I will ask again.

Name me 1 team in the top 25 Alabama wouldnt be favored over on a neutral field site. 1 TEAM.

If Bama and Oke St played Bama would crush them. They would disrupt and shut down their 1 dimensional offense and Trent Richardson would just pound them into submission. It would be a slow painful death similarly to what they did to Auburn.

Again, the 2 BEST TEAMS should play for the national championships. Not 2 conference championship teams who are good. 2 BEST TEAMS PERIOD.
Posted by Jwodie
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2009
7191 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:11 pm to
STFU, this thread isn't for your meaningless opinion.
Posted by Polar Bear
Member since Oct 2009
1800 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

Again, the 2 BEST TEAMS should play for the national championships. Not 2 conference championship teams who are good. 2 BEST TEAMS PERIOD


If Oklahoma State would have barely won against Iowa State in OT, does that change your opinion on whether or not they could hang with 'Bama?
Posted by carbola
Bloomington, IN
Member since Aug 2010
4308 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:13 pm to
Favoring doesn't mean shite. Gotta let the teams play.

Reasons for Alabama: Their only loss is to #1 LSU at home.

Reasons for OSU: Their only loss was because of a miscalled field goal that resulted in a 2OT loss on the road.
They have played more Top 30 and Top 50 teams
They have played more teams with winning records

So why should Bama go again? I am a huge LSU fan, but take off your damn SEC glasses and see this for what it is.
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37246 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

The majority of the voters will avoid a rematch, when offered another reasonable choice.


You should take a look at the coaches poll.
Posted by Saintstr504
NOLA
Member since Oct 2010
27 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:29 pm to
I would rather play Bama. It would make a NC win that more meaningful. That said, call me crazy but, I think OSU pulls it off tonight.

Either way... This team is ready.
Posted by Melvin
Member since Apr 2011
23535 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

I would rather play Bama. It would make a NC win that more meaningful. That said, call me crazy but, I think OSU pulls it off tonight. Either way... This team is ready.
lsu can't win in this situation. If bama gets in everyone will say they wish lsu had played a high scoring offense but if osu gets in everyone will say they think bama could have beaten us. This whole situation is ridiculous
Posted by natethegreat
Member since Dec 2008
740 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:33 pm to
Agreed, it was already mentioned that bama would hold their weight in computers, but the human element would be the difference maker. It seems like it's working.
Posted by tigerprl
DFW
Member since Dec 2010
1278 posts
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:48 pm to
don't make a difference as long as we kick the arse of whoever is number two. Lsu has no say so who is the opponent. tigers job is to beat whoever the gurus put up against us. we do that and it doesn't make a difference what any one else says.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram