- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
One of the best things from last night...is the refs
Posted on 11/6/11 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 11/6/11 at 1:53 pm
Didn't screw us.
I saw what I thought were numerous holding penalties that weren't called, but I don't remember either team being flagged for holding.
I was very glad that neither team can blame the refs for the victory or loss.
Great job by the refs and I can't believe I am saying that.
I saw what I thought were numerous holding penalties that weren't called, but I don't remember either team being flagged for holding.
I was very glad that neither team can blame the refs for the victory or loss.
Great job by the refs and I can't believe I am saying that.
6
Posted on 11/6/11 at 1:59 pm to panzer
I think that Bama was certainly getting the calls in the beginning.
1. Their Oline was holding nearly every play until the eventual holding call - which is when Richardson's yardage went from good to non-existent.
2. Jarrett Lee got creamed twice in the beginning. One was debatable, but one was blatant. Both times, the defender hadn't even lowered his body yet prior to Lee releasing the pass - both times the defender took atleast an extra two steps and then put his whole body into it.
3. Twice Bama gets pinned back near their own endzone - twice the refs decide to put their glasses on and start making some calls to get Bama out of trouble.
The main thing that I noticed was Bama's offensive line holding in the first half. It got to the point where they were doing it with that "hey we're bama - they won't flag us" mentality. If you watch their offense before and after the holding call, it's 180 degrees different.
I think if we would have lost that game we could easily point out many times in which the refs screwed us.
1. Their Oline was holding nearly every play until the eventual holding call - which is when Richardson's yardage went from good to non-existent.
2. Jarrett Lee got creamed twice in the beginning. One was debatable, but one was blatant. Both times, the defender hadn't even lowered his body yet prior to Lee releasing the pass - both times the defender took atleast an extra two steps and then put his whole body into it.
3. Twice Bama gets pinned back near their own endzone - twice the refs decide to put their glasses on and start making some calls to get Bama out of trouble.
The main thing that I noticed was Bama's offensive line holding in the first half. It got to the point where they were doing it with that "hey we're bama - they won't flag us" mentality. If you watch their offense before and after the holding call, it's 180 degrees different.
I think if we would have lost that game we could easily point out many times in which the refs screwed us.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:02 pm to geauxgeebs
quote:
Twice Bama gets pinned back near their own endzone - twice the refs decide to put their glasses on and start making some calls to get Bama out of trouble.
Please cite examples.
You people are such dolts.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:05 pm to panzer
quote:
I was very glad that neither team can blame the refs for the victory or loss.
You must not be reading TideFans this morning.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:10 pm to panzer
quote:
I was very glad that neither team can blame the refs for the victory or loss.
Prime Time CBS National Broadcast, they had to call a clean game or be exposed to the whole nation.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:15 pm to panzer
i was very pleased with the officiating.. especially given the past with ritter.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:18 pm to panzer
quote:
Didn't screw us.
I don't mind the non-calls if they don't call em for both teams, just don't have double standards.
Refs did a fine job last night!!
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:27 pm to panzer
The refs didn't screw us, they screw'd Bama. Eric Reid's int was not an int and completely changed the game in our favor.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:30 pm to geauxgeebs
"hey we're bama - they won't flag us" mentality
Actually, it is the "hey this is college football, for some reason the refs don't call holding anymore unless someone gets DDTed at the refs feet" mentality. It is time to put boxing gloves on linemen.
Actually, it is the "hey this is college football, for some reason the refs don't call holding anymore unless someone gets DDTed at the refs feet" mentality. It is time to put boxing gloves on linemen.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:31 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
That's horse shite. The ball did a 180 in his hand the call was 100 percent correct.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:33 pm to Weizenman
I thought the refs did an excellent job. I thought that Reid's interception was going to be overturned since we were in Tuscaloosa, but props to the refs for making the right call.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:45 pm to Catman88
quote:
That's horse shite. The ball did a 180 in his hand the call was 100 percent correct.
Of course you think so. a very large number of sports personalities have showed their strong disagreement with you, but it doesn't matter.
The call was made, the call was blown, an the call was blown a second time during review. That pretty much makes it final. Of course, the fact that ever since we found out who the officiating crew was going to be I have heard nothing but LSU fans bitch about how bad this crew sucks will never be heard since the calls went in y'alls favor this time. Funny how hat works.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:47 pm to Terry the Tiger
quote:
"hey this is college football, for some reason the refs don't call holding anymore unless someone gets DDTed at the refs feet" mentality
You do realize they have changed the definition of holding now right? Holding someone is perfectly legal as long as your hands are in the right place. That's why you keep seeing people "hold" and not get called for it. Because they are doing it within the rules.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:49 pm to ThaKaptin
Call on the field stands. Reid came down with it and saying that it was a "blown call" is a bit much. Debatable but not blown.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:49 pm to ThaKaptin
quote:
That's horse shite. The ball did a 180 in his hand the call was 100 percent correct.
Of course you think so. a very large number of sports personalities have showed their strong disagreement with you, but it doesn't matter.
The call was made, the call was blown, an the call was blown a second time during review. That pretty much makes it final. Of course, the fact that ever since we found out who the officiating crew was going to be I have heard nothing but LSU fans bitch about how bad this crew sucks will never be heard since the calls went in y'alls favor this time. Funny how hat works.
i guess i havent watched enough post game coverage. what "sports personalities" disagreed with the interception? i never heard one. the refs, the announcers, and the gameday crew all agreed it was an interception from what i saw.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:54 pm to Behind The Ivy
quote:
i guess i havent watched enough post game coverage. what "sports personalities" disagreed with the interception? i never heard one. the refs, the announcers, and the gameday crew all agreed it was an interception from what i saw.
THIS
No one said it was not an interception. Entire TV crew agreed with the call on the field and not one of the national announcers said anything about it, unlike 09 when Murray Divot was born.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:54 pm to ThaKaptin
El TheKaptin, just what did you see on Reid's interception that did not meet with your rules interpretation???
The two were falling and Reid's arm was between the receiver's chest and the ball. The ball was "not cradled" by the receiver. When the twosome hit the ground Reid's arm had circumvented the ball, he rolled over in sole possession, aka, "frickin' end of story".
Congrats to Bama, great game!
The two were falling and Reid's arm was between the receiver's chest and the ball. The ball was "not cradled" by the receiver. When the twosome hit the ground Reid's arm had circumvented the ball, he rolled over in sole possession, aka, "frickin' end of story".
Congrats to Bama, great game!
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:54 pm to LSUGrad9295
quote:THIS IS A RANT BOARD NOT AT SCHOLARLY JOURNAL. WE WILL RIGHT WHAT WE WANT IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT DON'T READ IT!!!! Thanks sorry had to get it of my chest thread continue
Please cite examples. You people are such dolts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:56 pm to ThaKaptin
Post game Urban Meyer was just saying that the tight end didn't fight hard enough to get it. That is pretty much what happened.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:57 pm to DollaChoppa
still pictures mean nothing when dealing with live action. The shots you would need would be the 3 or 4 frames before he hit the ground and the 3 or 4 frames after. Without all of those in stream, any still shots would be worthless.
Plus, if you HAD to go from that still. Looks like Williams has both hands on the ball. Without seeing movement (would need video for that) you have to assume possession and at the point of the receiver hitting the ground he is down, and tie goes to the receiver. But as I said before, stills are worthless in reviewing live action.
Plus, if you HAD to go from that still. Looks like Williams has both hands on the ball. Without seeing movement (would need video for that) you have to assume possession and at the point of the receiver hitting the ground he is down, and tie goes to the receiver. But as I said before, stills are worthless in reviewing live action.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News