- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Jefferson Coming On Strong
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:34 am
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:34 am
It appears that some folks are now in belief that Jefferson will take over the starting QB position.
They claim he brings more athleticism. Brings the run option. Gives the offense more flexibility.
All Jarrett Lee has done is win 5 games and thrown more touchdowns than JJ did all year?
Is it manditory that a quarterback be a runner to win? Were Matt Flynn and Mauck running quarterbacks?
They claim he brings more athleticism. Brings the run option. Gives the offense more flexibility.
All Jarrett Lee has done is win 5 games and thrown more touchdowns than JJ did all year?
Is it manditory that a quarterback be a runner to win? Were Matt Flynn and Mauck running quarterbacks?
12
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:34 am to 2007lsuno1
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:34 am to 2007lsuno1
quote:
It appears that some folks are now in belief that Jefferson will take over the starting QB position
Some folks can believe what they want.
Miles has his starter.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:35 am to MandevilleLSUTiger
I agree 100%. Just don't understand the banter.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:36 am to MandevilleLSUTiger
Before the "incident" Jefferson was the starter for a reason folks.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:38 am to 2007lsuno1
quote:
Were Matt Flynn and Mauck running quarterbacks?
uh...yeah
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:38 am to MandevilleLSUTiger
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:39 am to ndtiger
quote:
Before the "incident" Jefferson was the starter for a reason folks.
He was in fact, the "starter".
But from all accounts, it was going to be very similar to last season, and Lee was going to play, hence the first team snaps he was still receiving.
There was not much seperation in the competition.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:39 am to 2007lsuno1
Who gives a shite. If you listened to what Miles said in his press conference yesterday, he is the decision maker and he isn't influenced by anything that comes from outside.
If Jefferson is made the starter it is because Miles made the decision. If Lee remains the starter it is because Miles made the decision. It won't be because of anything that any rantard said or any booing that comes down to the field from the stadium.
If Jefferson is made the starter it is because Miles made the decision. If Lee remains the starter it is because Miles made the decision. It won't be because of anything that any rantard said or any booing that comes down to the field from the stadium.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:40 am to ndtiger
quote:
Before the "incident" Jefferson was the starter for a reason folks.
Things have changed.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:40 am to MandevilleLSUTiger
quote:
There was not much seperation in the competition.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:41 am to 2007lsuno1
quote:
some folks are now in belief
Well if some folks are now in belief then it is set in stone. Jefferswag pain train!
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:41 am to 2007lsuno1
quote:
some folks
quote:
They
Who are these people?
quote:Versus not having a strong running QB? Yes.
he brings more athleticism.
quote:Sure.
Brings the run option.
quote:Maybe.
Gives the offense more flexibility.
But none of that alone warrants the starting position.
quote:Flynn was a pretty strong runner, but pretty balanced overall.
Were Matt Flynn and Mauck running quarterbacks?
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:41 am to ndtiger
So you are telling me Lee would not have played?
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:42 am to ndtiger
quote:
Before the "incident" Jefferson was the starter for a reason folks.
So was Bledsoe before Brady.
A passing QB can't be givin 2 series and out and 1 series and out. They need to settle in, see what the "D" is doing. They get an in game feel for how defenders react to certain plays. You can't get that when you're on the sidelines. I said all least year with the way Lee played in limited time, if he was ever given the ball and said "this is your offense lets see what you can do" I believe he would have been very steady, just like he has this year.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:42 am to MandevilleLSUTiger
Idk, beating a guy out 3 straight years isn't just by chance. And lee received a few snaps per practice, it's not like it was split. Also, jj accounted for 14 td's last year, not 7 like ppl have mentioned.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:42 am to ndtiger
Can not dispute; however, haven't we witnessed success at the position on the field we didn't see last year? Hasn't Lee thrown the ball better than JJ did all of last year? Why would you disturb an offense that is working and successful? Why would one not play Lee. Where is the problem with Lee's play? What has he done to warrant being replaced?
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:44 am to 2007lsuno1
JJ is not a running QB. He just has the ability to scramble
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:44 am to 2007lsuno1
Wow, you have added alot of new outstanding information to the board this morning.
Keep up the good work.
Keep up the good work.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 8:46 am to USMCTiger03
quote:
Who are these people?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News