- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Studthorpe offensive prodctivity.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 1:31 am
Posted on 10/4/11 at 1:31 am
5
Posted on 10/4/11 at 1:32 am to BigDropper
BEST THREAD EVAR1111!1!!1!!!!ELEVEN
Posted on 10/4/11 at 1:46 am to 9Fiddy
I would give him a B+.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 2:26 am to BigDropper
Meh. I would personally like to see more 3 receiver 1 back sets to spread defenses out a little bit.
Right now we're getting away with ramming a square peg through a circle hole. I give it a C mainly due to organization. I do however feel we could be much more explosive. Not complaining either, just stating opinion.
Right now we're getting away with ramming a square peg through a circle hole. I give it a C mainly due to organization. I do however feel we could be much more explosive. Not complaining either, just stating opinion.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 4:46 am to BigDropper
Best thing has been ball security otherwise, meh....
We are not an explosive offense. It's pretty bland.
The two best plays have both been to Beckham: the beautiful play action and OBJ's open field brilliance after the catch vs UK
We are not an explosive offense. It's pretty bland.
The two best plays have both been to Beckham: the beautiful play action and OBJ's open field brilliance after the catch vs UK
Posted on 10/4/11 at 4:53 am to BigDropper
If our WRs caught the balls that have hit them in the hands and were reasonably catchable --- our Offensive production would look better.
That said --- I look at total yards and points scored..... there I see that we are doing fine.
Room for improvement... yes, same of stuff as the past two years... no.
JJ's 3 open field carries for 29 yards were not a fluke.... giving us that demension is a plus.
That said --- I look at total yards and points scored..... there I see that we are doing fine.
Room for improvement... yes, same of stuff as the past two years... no.
JJ's 3 open field carries for 29 yards were not a fluke.... giving us that demension is a plus.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 4:58 am to TheBob
quote:
Meh. I would personally like to see more 3 receiver 1 back sets to spread defenses out a little bit.
Right now we're getting away with ramming a square peg through a circle hole. I give it a C mainly due to organization. I do however feel we could be much more explosive.
West Virginia found this formation pretty explosive . . .
. . . . . . especially on 3rd and 1.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 5:18 am to BigDropper
I like that we have a winning formula, but I would like to see a little more 3 and 4 wide and less I formation
randle
sheppard
OBJ
Boone/wright/landry
ware/ford/blue in the backfield or have MT backfield and have peterson go out into route as a TE.
randle
sheppard
OBJ
Boone/wright/landry
ware/ford/blue in the backfield or have MT backfield and have peterson go out into route as a TE.
Posted on 10/4/11 at 5:48 am to 3XTiger
quote:
I would give him a B+.
He has had the role for barely a month and there has been sufficient change in offensive personnel as well and chances are he is still experimenting and needs to get comfortable with his role in the next month or so.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News