- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Explain the negatives of JJ getting 5-6 wildcat/option snaps
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:00 pm
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:00 pm
We aren't going to beat a team like Alabama running the ball 35 times between the tackles. It'll be good to have a variety of looks to throw at them.
JJ ISN'T TAKING OVER AS STARTER. HE ISN'T GOING TO GET 50% OF THE SNAPS.
JJ ISN'T TAKING OVER AS STARTER. HE ISN'T GOING TO GET 50% OF THE SNAPS.
34
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:01 pm to Elleshoe
quote:
Explain the negatives of JJ getting 5-6 wildcat/option snaps
Good luck getting a logical explanation.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:01 pm to Elleshoe
Any play he is in for takes plays away from what is currently a productive offense.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:02 pm to Elleshoe
Because being able to do more things on offense sucks!
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:02 pm to Icansee4miles
Right on cue. 
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:02 pm to Icansee4miles
quote:
Any play he is in for takes plays away from what is currently a productive offense.
you don't think a wildcat package with him in will be the least bit helpful against teams like UF and Alabama?
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:02 pm to Elleshoe
quote:We have people much more capable of running the wildcat.
Explain the negatives of JJ getting 5-6 wildcat/option snaps
Ware with Ford in the backfield
Shep with Ware or Ford in the backfield
I think those are both way better options than JJ.
The only thing that JJ would bring to the table is it wouldn't be a dead giveaway until about the 3rd time.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:02 pm to Elleshoe
We aren't going to beat them throwing behind receivers either.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:02 pm to Elleshoe
i am from the if it aint broke dont fix it camp.
this offense isnt broke.
this offense isnt broke.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:02 pm to Elleshoe
There aren't any.
JJ should get some wildcat snaps in the red zone. Eventually.
He shouldn't play for 2-3 weeks. He hasn't practiced in over a month.
ETA: I'm talking like 3 or 4 snaps a game. And it won't matter if they know it's coming. A Jefferson combo with Ware/Shepard in the backfield would be pretty hard to defend. And Jefferson always falls forward on his runs.
JJ should get some wildcat snaps in the red zone. Eventually.
He shouldn't play for 2-3 weeks. He hasn't practiced in over a month.
ETA: I'm talking like 3 or 4 snaps a game. And it won't matter if they know it's coming. A Jefferson combo with Ware/Shepard in the backfield would be pretty hard to defend. And Jefferson always falls forward on his runs.
This post was edited on 9/28/11 at 8:05 pm
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:03 pm to southernelite
quote:
Ware with Ford in the backfield
Shep with Ware or Ford in the backfield
except JJ is a much more legit passing threat. We could run a decent option game with JJ in...
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:03 pm to Elleshoe
The potential negatives?
(1) Disrupts the flow of the offense;
(2) Telegraphs the type of play we will run;
(3) Displaces other more creative and effective plays;
(4) Confusion and penalties resulting from abrupt changes in personnel and formation;
(5) Potential turnovers on those occasions when Jefferson attempts to throw.
I'm sure I could list far more.
(1) Disrupts the flow of the offense;
(2) Telegraphs the type of play we will run;
(3) Displaces other more creative and effective plays;
(4) Confusion and penalties resulting from abrupt changes in personnel and formation;
(5) Potential turnovers on those occasions when Jefferson attempts to throw.
I'm sure I could list far more.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:03 pm to Elleshoe
thats 5-6 snaps taken away from 3-4 players that are better suited with the football in their hands.
END OF THREAD/
END OF THREAD/
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:03 pm to Elleshoe
quote:
JJ ISN'T TAKING OVER AS STARTER. HE ISN'T GOING TO GET 50% OF THE SNAPS
Don't bring any sanity here tonight.
The reason is because lee might get his feelings hurt if Jefferson gets snaps.
Did I do the conspiracy chicken little fan scenario right?
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:03 pm to Elleshoe
quote:
We aren't going to beat a team like Alabama running the ball 35 times between the tackles.
How about by throwing catchable balls off playaction? Can we beat them then?
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:03 pm to Elleshoe
quote:
you don't think a wildcat package with him in will be the least bit helpful against teams like UF and Alabama?
honestly no
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:04 pm to jcole4lsu
quote:
i am from the if it aint broke dont fix it camp.
This. Unless the offense starts falling apart there is really no reason to mess with it and change things up. It messes with the flow they have now.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:04 pm to TIGRLEE
quote:
thats 5-6 snaps taken away from 3-4 players that are better suited with the football in their hands.
but no one else is a legit pass and run option.
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:04 pm to Elleshoe
Why is it even needed at this point. The offense, including production, confidence and chemistry is way ahead of where we were when JJ was involved. Until that changes I dee no reason to upset the apple cart. At this point I'm willing to let it ride with Lee
Posted on 9/28/11 at 8:05 pm to jcole4lsu
Has the offense been unproductive to this point? I don't see a need to change. Playing Mett is different because he is the future. Jefferson is the past.
Page 1 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News