View in: Desktop
Copyright @2024 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
Apparently Oregon Lost because of Penalties and Turnovers. nothing more
Posted by Tigerbait231 on 9/6/11 at 12:01 pm00
quote:
The Ducks’ two primary reserves from 2010, tackle Darrion Weems and guard Ramsen Golpashin, slid into the starting lineup Saturday, but each was flagged for two false-start penalties and a leg whip, for throwing their bodies at the legs of defenders in what is usually interpreted as a legal cut block, but that was viewed by the officials as an unacceptable technique.
Chop blocks are now legal in Oregon, and apparently the D had nothing to do with the loss. I guess if i was an Oregon Duck writer i would try to put some kind of positive spin on it to though...
LINK
re: Apparently Oregon Lost because of Penalties and Turnovers. nothing morePosted by bwallcubfan on 9/6/11 at 12:02 pm to Tigerbait231
yeah they lost it...we didn't win it...nothing earned here...
re: Apparently Oregon Lost because of Penalties and Turnovers. nothing morePosted by omegaman66 on 9/6/11 at 12:03 pm to Tigerbait231
Anybody that thinks this is a moron. Oregon lost because their opponent scored more points. That is how it works in every game I have ever watched.
re: Apparently Oregon Lost because of Penalties and Turnovers. nothing morePosted by Maximus on 9/6/11 at 12:04 pm to Tigerbait231
cut blocks are legal. But leg whips are not. And crying is fun.
re: Apparently Oregon Lost because of Penalties and Turnovers. nothing morePosted by Rabid Tiger on 9/6/11 at 12:04 pm to Tigerbait231
Sounds like the UGA fans after UGA 2003 Part 1.
I could go for another arse whooping of the Ducks.
I could go for another arse whooping of the Ducks.
This post was edited on 9/6 at 12:08 pm
re: Apparently Oregon Lost because of Penalties and Turnovers. nothing morePosted by manwich on 9/6/11 at 12:05 pm to Tigerbait231
Cut does not equal Chop
re: Apparently Oregon Lost because of Penalties and Turnovers. nothing morePosted by Tiger Ryno on 9/6/11 at 12:06 pm to Tigerbait231
They had turnovers because their lineman were repeatedly beaten so bad they had to resort to tripping or clipping to stop the penetration. On special teams they were getting assaulted so fast they had to hold to avoid their returner getting destroyed (which did eventually happen).
On the turnover front, we flat out played more aggressive and took the ball away. Our players were coached to knock the ball out and we outhustled them. ran faster, reacted quicker and took every opportunity to TAKE the game away from them.
Yes...I agree it was penalties and turnovers that made the differencce.
On the turnover front, we flat out played more aggressive and took the ball away. Our players were coached to knock the ball out and we outhustled them. ran faster, reacted quicker and took every opportunity to TAKE the game away from them.
Yes...I agree it was penalties and turnovers that made the differencce.
re: Apparently Oregon Lost because of Penalties and Turnovers. nothing morePosted by manwich on 9/6/11 at 12:07 pm to Tigerbait231
Oregon came out of the gate playing dirty. The officials saw it and made the necessary calls. I don't see what the big deal is.
TD SponsorTD Fan
USA
Member since 2001
USA
Member since 2001
Thank you for supporting our sponsors Posted by Site Sponsor to Everyone
Advertisement
re: Apparently Oregon Lost because of Penalties and Turnovers. nothing morePosted by Prominentwon on 9/6/11 at 12:07 pm to Tigerbait231
quote:
Penalties and Turnovers.
I was unaware that penalties and turnovers were part of the game.
re: Apparently Oregon Lost because of Penalties and Turnovers. nothing morePosted by Sev09 on 9/6/11 at 12:08 pm to Tiger Ryno
re: Apparently Oregon Lost because of Penalties and Turnovers. nothing morePosted by TigerTreyjpg on 9/6/11 at 12:09 pm to omegaman66
That win this past Saturday night was about as complete a throttling as I've seen LSU put on a team.
Every possible good thing that needed to happen for LSU happened:
1. Lee playing adequate/above adequate
2. Super strong running game
3. Smothering defense
4. Our superior depth becoming a factor
A true, complete beatdown. If you're Oregon, there is no positive way to spin this. When Oregon lined up on offense, tried to play their game, and got completely shut down by our defense. When LSU's offense lined up, they played their game, and it worked.
Every possible good thing that needed to happen for LSU happened:
1. Lee playing adequate/above adequate
2. Super strong running game
3. Smothering defense
4. Our superior depth becoming a factor
A true, complete beatdown. If you're Oregon, there is no positive way to spin this. When Oregon lined up on offense, tried to play their game, and got completely shut down by our defense. When LSU's offense lined up, they played their game, and it worked.
re: Apparently Oregon Lost because of Penalties and Turnovers. nothing morePosted by LSULANE on 9/6/11 at 12:11 pm to Tigerbait231
Need to publish a list of excuses to mail out to opponents before each game. Just check the box for the excuses you would like to use.
re: Apparently Oregon Lost because of Penalties and Turnovers. nothing morePosted by HeadSlash on 9/6/11 at 12:11 pm to Tigerbait231
quote:
I guess if i was an Oregon Duck writer i would try to put some kind of positive spin on it to though...
Is that the same douchebag reporter that claimed kelly was a genius and Les was a doofus that did not know how to wear his cap correctly?
re: Apparently Oregon Lost because of Penalties and Turnovers. nothing morePosted by FelicianaTigerfan on 9/6/11 at 12:12 pm to TigerTreyjpg
Many of their penalties were doue to the fact that they were being out played.
re: Apparently Oregon Lost because of Penalties and Turnovers. nothing morePosted by TigersOfGeauxld on 9/6/11 at 12:12 pm to TigerTreyjpg
quote:
That win this past Saturday night was about as complete a throttling as I've seen LSU put on a team.
Every possible good thing that needed to happen for LSU happened:
1. Lee playing adequate/above adequate
2. Super strong running game
3. Smothering defense
4. Our superior depth becoming a factor
A true, complete beatdown. If you're Oregon, there is no positive way to spin this. When Oregon lined up on offense, tried to play their game, and got completely shut down by our defense. When LSU's offense lined up, they played their game, and it worked
Quoted for complete truth. Add to that the fact the Ducks got beat by LSU's second string QB, who only found out he was starting a week before the game.
No way to spin that.
re: Apparently Oregon Lost because of Penalties and Turnovers. nothing morePosted by ZTiger87 on 9/6/11 at 12:12 pm to Tigerbait231
They did lose because of penalties and turnovers. We also had a lot to do with causing those penalties and turnovers.
re: Apparently Oregon Lost because of Penalties and Turnovers. nothing morePosted by LSUROCKS52 on 9/6/11 at 12:18 pm to FelicianaTigerfan
How come credit never goes to the opposition for FORCING turnovers. the turnovers didn't come on fluke plays like if james had shredded LSU's defense for an 80 yard run yet mysteriously (or desean jacksonesque) fumble before getting into the end zone. LSU D/ST punched the ball out 3 times and simon caught a horrible pass from thomas. LSU's turnover, on the other hand, was completely unforced. just miscommunication between the center and QB.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News