Started By
Message
locked post

Milsap on the trade block?

Posted on 6/27/11 at 6:06 pm
Posted by JayJay2
cane sweeeeeeet tea, Luzianne
Member since Jul 2010
15359 posts
Posted on 6/27/11 at 6:06 pm
The Jazz talked about trading Paul Millsap on draft night, according to the New York Daily News.
After drafting Turkish C Enes Kanter third overall, the Jazz certainly have a logjam up front. Millsap did play the small forward spot at times last year, but it clearly isn't his natural position. With Derrick Favors and Al Jefferson also in need of minutes, a trade makes some sense. If no deal goes down, the minutes here may become cramped.

Source: New York Daily News Jun 26, 8:24 PM

LINK
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34238 posts
Posted on 6/27/11 at 6:13 pm to
That would be nice
Posted by JayJay2
cane sweeeeeeet tea, Luzianne
Member since Jul 2010
15359 posts
Posted on 6/27/11 at 6:18 pm to
yeah try and do some kinda sign and trade or some shite
Posted by bigbenlsu
New Orleans
Member since May 2005
1104 posts
Posted on 6/27/11 at 6:48 pm to
We have no one to offer.
Posted by death valley driver
CHOPPA CITY
Member since Jul 2004
11591 posts
Posted on 6/27/11 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

Message Posted by bigbenlsu We have no one to offer.



so true and so pathetic. demps turned 2 valuable pieces into no valuable pieces
Posted by Holdatigah
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2007
454 posts
Posted on 6/27/11 at 11:44 pm to
quote:

demps turned 2 valuable pieces into no valuable pieces

Thornton would be a RFA, as well.

Who else are you referring to? Let's hope it's not Brackins or the first round pick.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61435 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 8:37 am to
quote:

demps turned 2 valuable pieces into no valuable pieces


I'm so tired of hearing this bullshite line of non-thought that doesn't take the big picture into consideration. Peja was supposedly traded to avoid bankruptcy. The precarious financial situation of this team and the need to sell tickets was/is very real.

Without using DC to turn Posey into Ariza this team doesn't make the playoffs. Without trading that 1st for Jack this team doesn't make the playoffs. For those of you that think one and done is pointless, the team sold 1000 - 2000 season tickets during the season when it looked like they were a playoff team again. They sold 1000 more season tickets during the playoff excitement. If you like the Hornets in New Orleans there's your fricking value.

As for Thornton, most of us here loved watching him play and wish he was still on the team, but if West leaves and we keep Landry which is looking likely, how can you say there was no value to that trade?
Posted by Hammond Tiger Fan
Hammond
Member since Oct 2007
16209 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 8:47 am to
quote:

TigerinATL


I understand your frustration with some of the comments, but honestly if the Hornets can't sign West, which I don't think they will b/c West will go for the biggest contract, I can see this really blowing up and the Hornets will become this past year's Cleavland damn near over night. I'm saying that b/c I really do believe CP3 will leave if DWest is gone, and with ownership up in the air they will not be able to attract any FA to make up for the loss of both DWest and CP3. This entire situation looks messy and I believe the dominoes will start falling if the Hornets aren't able to retain West.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421299 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 9:10 am to
quote:

Without using DC to turn Posey into Ariza this team doesn't make the playoffs.

at this point, is that a positive?

if we had DC now, we MAY (key word) have a legit chip to trade for a guy like milsap

what did making the playoffs do for the team? nothing

quote:

the team sold 1000 - 2000 season tickets during the season when it looked like they were a playoff team again. They sold 1000 more season tickets during the playoff excitement. If you like the Hornets in New Orleans there's your fricking value.

the league wasn't moving the team once shinn shite the bed. we'll get 1 more owner to show our market can support an NBA team

there is no way stern would have allowed that big of a public embarrassment. that's why the NBA bought the team to avoid the embarrassment of bankruptcy in the first place

quote:

As for Thornton, most of us here loved watching him play and wish he was still on the team, but if West leaves and we keep Landry which is looking likely, how can you say there was no value to that trade?

i always pegged landry as west's replacement

but we better get some other guys, b/c landry at the 4 with our current 2,3,5 = no chance for this team
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421299 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 9:11 am to
quote:

I understand your frustration with some of the comments, but honestly if the Hornets can't sign West, which I don't think they will b/c West will go for the biggest contract, I can see this really blowing up and the Hornets will become this past year's Cleavland damn near over night. I'm saying that b/c I really do believe CP3 will leave if DWest is gone, and with ownership up in the air they will not be able to attract any FA to make up for the loss of both DWest and CP3. This entire situation looks messy and I believe the dominoes will start falling if the Hornets aren't able to retain West.

yea, if baring our roster and losing west end up having the hornets leave nola, then we'd be in the same boat anyway. it's not a logical excuse for the DC/MT5 deals
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61435 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 9:15 am to
I don't disagree. I think right now there's a 30% chance CP3 stays with the Hornets, a 50% chance he gets traded for a good rebuilding package and a 10% chance he walks for nothing (the lockout killing an entire season could be disastrous). That still doesn't mean people can turn their brains off when discussing things. I'm not asking for sunshine, I'm asking for people to think things through a bit more because it's often not as black and white as they think it is.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61435 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 9:21 am to
quote:

if baring our roster and losing west end up having the hornets leave nola,


That's probably not going to happen. Stern has made it a point to keep the team in NOLA and if the new CBA delivers profitability like it's supposed to, a local owner will step up, even if he has to rebuild the team. Even that player friendly deal the players just rejected made teams profitable.

New Orleans has embraced losers before, they just have to be hard working and exciting. Watching DC and MT5 lose was entertaining. I'm sure Demps can build a fun to watch team with a couple of 2012 lottery picks and young players acquired via trade, and Demps looks competent enough to turn that into a playoff team in a few years.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421299 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 9:32 am to
quote:

That's probably not going to happen. Stern has made it a point to keep the team in NOLA

then the bad moves with peja's contract, etc were in vain. if stern doesnt' want the hornets to leave, he doesnt' want them to leave

quote:

and if the new CBA delivers profitability like it's supposed to

define "profitability"

the big teams will have to be able to spend more to garner national interest or nobody makes money

do you mean revenue sharing?

quote:

and Demps looks competent enough to turn that into a playoff team in a few years.

i don't know if demps has shown anything close to this level of management yet
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61435 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 9:46 am to
quote:

do you mean revenue sharing?


Yes. I don't think they ever get to a $45 million hard cap, it has to be done with more revenue sharing.

quote:

i don't know if demps has shown anything close to this level of management yet


So far he's shown that he understands fit and that he won't overpay, but you're right he doesn't have much of a track record yet.

It could have just been a random number he threw out, or it could have been a freudian slip, but in an interview he was asked who he had been looking at and what position they got drafted and he said he couldn't answer that and then jokingly replied he got taken 5th. To me that says Jonas Valanciunas is who he liked most in the draft. Not important really but potentially more insight into how Demps thinks.
This post was edited on 6/28/11 at 9:47 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421299 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Yes. I don't think they ever get to a $45 million hard cap, it has to be done with more revenue sharing.

this just means the few teams who are annually profitable won't be profitable, and nobody makes money

quote:

and that he won't overpay

i'll give him this based on the DWest extension. 3 years is more important than $26M, but it was a solid starting offer. 3/$33M is probably as high as he should go. he cannot go further, imho, or we are dead
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34238 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

the big teams will have to be able to spend more to garner national interest or nobody makes money


And this statement is based on what?
Posted by CajunFootball
Jackson, Mississippi
Member since Oct 2010
19432 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 3:11 pm to
Boston might make a move to get him. They need help in the paint.
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34238 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

this just means the few teams who are annually profitable won't be profitable, and nobody makes money


How do you come to these conclusions?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421299 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

And this statement is based on what?

look at the ratings for finals without marquee teams
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421299 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

How do you come to these conclusions?

there are only a few teams who generate legit revenue outside of the tv deals. these are the teams who spend money (for obvious reasons)

if only 8 teams are profitable, and the majority of these are the aforementioned big clubs, what do you think will happen when they stop being profitable (by losing revenue to higher revenue sharing)?

they'll spend less, make less, and then the big teams aren't marketable b/c they wont' spend as much. then there aren't great teams in los angeles, chicago, miami, new york, etc and fans lose interest, nationally. then the next tv deal is shite and everyone makes even less
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram