- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Ohio St receives notice of allegations from the NCAA
Posted on 4/25/11 at 9:46 am
Posted on 4/25/11 at 9:46 am
LINK
This post was edited on 4/25/11 at 9:47 am
7
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:00 am to usc6158
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:01 am to KillerNut9
No failure to monitor or lack of institutional control= meh
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:01 am to usc6158
quote:
Tressel was guilty of ethical misconduct when he knowingly provided false information to the NCAA in certifying that he knew of no potential violations by his players and failed to inform OSU officials.
Tressel = gone
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:03 am to usc6158
bye bye Tressel
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:04 am to TouchdownTN
quote:
Tressel = gone
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:05 am to usc6158
This entire season should be Fickell's job interview.
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:08 am to SprintFun
quote:
SprintFun
I know the rule well, it's what Pearl was hit with.
If Tressel is retained, he will be the only coach in NCAA history to be hit with that charge, and not subsequently fired.
If OSU doesn't have the balls to do the right thing, ESPN and other media outlets will pile on until the staff and program collapses.
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:11 am to TouchdownTN
It was kids selling their own property I would have brushed it aside as well
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:13 am to usc6158
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:14 am to TouchdownTN
quote:
If Tressel is retained, he will be the only coach in NCAA history to be hit with that charge, and not subsequently fired.
Were any coaches as remotely successful as Tress has been?
If his head was going to roll it already would have IMO.
In the end we vacate wins from 2010 (not the Sugar Bowl though), possibly a 1 year bowl ban, lose some scholarships and in 5 years Jim Tressel becomes the new AD of Ohio St.
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:15 am to finallyfastohio
And Pearl had a BBQ, with his current team and a couple of highschool juniors.
The coverup is the major violation.
Right, because acknowledging the violation instantly dashes any hopes of making a BCS championship game.
The coverup is the major violation.
quote:
I would have brushed it aside as well
Right, because acknowledging the violation instantly dashes any hopes of making a BCS championship game.
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:15 am to SprintFun
quote:
not the Sugar Bowl though
That is the only one that matters
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:15 am to PortCityTiger24
I'm actually more pissed the Michigan streak will be over
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:16 am to SprintFun
quote:
In the end we vacate wins from 2010 (not the Sugar Bowl though), possibly a 1 year bowl ban, lose some scholarships
Take away the post season ban, add a show-cause penalty to Tressel, and you've probably nailed it.
This post was edited on 4/25/11 at 10:17 am
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:17 am to KillerNut9
quote:
I'm actually more pissed the Michigan streak will be over
We vacate the win, we don't forfeit the game. Michigan streak is not over. The 2010 regular season just magically didn't happen.
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:19 am to SprintFun
It'll be interesting to see if the NCAA decides to use their newly discovered "high profile athlete" distinction
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:20 am to SprintFun
True, but it still puts on a damper on it for me personally. August 12 will be a big day in Ohio.
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:20 am to usc6158
quote:
It'll be interesting to see if the NCAA decides to use their newly discovered "high profile athlete" distinction
Not sure what you mean, but the NCAA said no further punishment to the athletes will come.
Posted on 4/25/11 at 10:21 am to finallyfastohio
quote:
It was kids selling their own property
That's the one thing I don't get. And I'm surprised no one has challenged it in court.
If I am the outright owner of an item, don't I have the right to do with it as I please? And then use the proceeds for any legitimate purpose, even if someone may consider it "waste"?
Did the NCAA push the matter because these kids blew their proceeds on bling, knowing the general public would probably side with them?
What if, instead of taking the money and blowing it on bling, one of the kids had sold his jersey and paid back rent to keep momma from being evicted? Would the NCAA have dared come down on him then? Or would the backlash from the public be so great that they would have backed off?
Page 1 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News