Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Baseball Rule Argument

Posted on 3/18/11 at 1:58 pm
Posted by lsumeyers
Leesville
Member since Jun 2005
1415 posts
Posted on 3/18/11 at 1:58 pm
Help settle and argument here. High school baseball, dropped third strike ruling, less than two outs, first base is open. The pitch bounces before it gets to the catcher. The batter swings and the catcher catches the pitch off the bounce without dropping. We had it called two different ways this week. One umpire let the batter advance because the pitch bounced, even though the catcher caught it. The other umpire saw the bounce and the catch and called the batter out without letting him attempt to advance. What is the correct interpretation of the rule?
Posted by Vicks Kennel Club
29-24 #BlewDat
Member since Dec 2010
31059 posts
Posted on 3/18/11 at 1:59 pm to
The former. If the ball hits the ground, then he should be able to run to first.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76445 posts
Posted on 3/18/11 at 2:00 pm to
Happens all the time in MLB, runner can advance.
Posted by bigpapamac
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
22375 posts
Posted on 3/18/11 at 2:00 pm to
If the pitch hits the dirtthe batter can run to first, it's irrelevant if the catcher fields it cleanly after a bounce. Bottom line is the pitch was in the dirt.
Posted by lsumeyers
Leesville
Member since Jun 2005
1415 posts
Posted on 3/18/11 at 2:01 pm to
That was one argument, but how can it be a dropped third strike if he never actually dropped it. I never took sides, but heard this argument.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57204 posts
Posted on 3/18/11 at 2:01 pm to
I thought the catcher could still throw him out at first?
Posted by SCUBABlake
RIP WT6
Member since Jan 2008
40338 posts
Posted on 3/18/11 at 2:02 pm to
It doesn't have to be a "drop" in the literal sense. It also covers the ball hitting the turf/dirt.

knight- he can.
This post was edited on 3/18/11 at 2:03 pm
Posted by bigpapamac
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
22375 posts
Posted on 3/18/11 at 2:04 pm to
He can, question was just should the batter have the chance to run to first. The rule isn't actually 'dropped third strike,' that just became the slang. If the pitch is in the dirt, the batter has the chance to advance
Posted by lsumeyers
Leesville
Member since Jun 2005
1415 posts
Posted on 3/18/11 at 2:04 pm to
Fair enough, both umpires made a good case for their argument but one had to be wrong.
Posted by oompaw
In piney hill country...
Member since Dec 2007
6271 posts
Posted on 3/18/11 at 2:05 pm to
Side note: Coach should teach catchers to always throw the ball to first or tag the runner if he doesn't run.
This post was edited on 3/18/11 at 2:06 pm
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41142 posts
Posted on 3/18/11 at 2:35 pm to
the third strike must be 'legally caught' by the catcher- meaning it must be in the catcher's glove before striking the ground/umpire
Posted by bigpapamac
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
22375 posts
Posted on 3/18/11 at 2:45 pm to
Exactly, like a catch in football. A receiver could catch a pass cleanly off a hop, but it's still not a catch.
Posted by DEANintheYAY
LEFT COAST
Member since Jan 2008
31975 posts
Posted on 3/18/11 at 2:46 pm to
frick A.J. Pieceofshit!!

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram