Started By
Message
locked post

What is Crowton's contract situation?

Posted on 11/28/10 at 2:15 pm
Posted by Martin Blank
Member since Sep 2005
397 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 2:15 pm
I've searched, but found no straight answer. It would seem, from a business standpoint, that whether Crowton is removed as OC this year depends on which affirmative step would need to be taken to keep him, or let him walk.

What I mean is this - if his contract is up, and it would require the affirmative step of signing him to a new deal to keep him on as OC for 2011, it would seem it's more likely that he's gone. In this scenario, no one has to actually do anything to get rid of Crowton. His contract simply expires, and he walks away.

Conversely, if he has another year, and getting rid of him requires the affirmative step of terminating him and buying him out, it seems more likely that he'd stay. There, the path of least resistance, i.e. doing nothing, causes Crowton to stay.

Of course, he could be signed to a new deal, or fired with years still left. So there are no guarantees based on contract status. But common sense would dictate that his contract being up this year is probably a stronger indication that he's leaving, than a year remaining would indicate that he's staying.

So does anyone know when Crowton's contract runs out?
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
27766 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 2:22 pm to
I'm not 100% sure, but I think his contract is up.
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
9187 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 2:24 pm to

I would think that an offense that has been in the bottom 20% of Div 1 at a school like LSU is enough to allow them to end the relationship without to much of a problem.

It might cost a little money, but people who would like to see LSU in the running for a 2012-2013 Nat'l Championship must understand the offense is not gonna get us there under his leadership.
Posted by south bama tiger
Member since May 2008
6646 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

It might cost a little money, but people who would like to see LSU in the running for a 2012-2013 Nat'l Championship must understand the offense is not gonna get us there under his leadership.


The people with all the money obviously didn't care too much about the 2010 National Championship.
Posted by amiznit
Missouri City
Member since Apr 2005
1850 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 2:27 pm to
He got a 3 year deal after the title game in 07. 2010 should be his last season as part of that deal.
Posted by Linkovich
crater lake
Member since Feb 2007
9541 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 2:50 pm to
released...hopefully.
Posted by ztraveler
metairie, la
Member since Aug 2007
564 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:03 pm to
Can we get rid of Crowton, before the bowl game
Posted by Linkovich
crater lake
Member since Feb 2007
9541 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:10 pm to
We should have bought him a separate ticket to Utah immediately after the game and told him that we'd ship his shite to him at no cost. Go back to his office, light his playbook on fire, take a picture of it, and mail it to him. Insert "This is the closest you've come to lighting our offense on fire all year. P.S. You're fired." on the picture and mail it to him with his buyout check.

Two weeks later Alleva should send Crowton the picture he took of him wiping his arse with the buyout check.


Any other questions about how I feel about Crowton?
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:26 pm to
Crowton will step down and focus on 'family life' or take a head coaching gig at a smaller program.
Posted by LSUMafia
Member since May 2005
9862 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 3:44 pm to
He's owed $469,000 after this year. Miles fought his arse off after 2008 to get his assistants 3-year deals particularly on offense, thus Studs and Crowton got 3 year deals starting in 2009.
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
49492 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

Miles fought his arse off after 2008 to get his assistants 3-year deals particularly on offense


If true, Leslie needs his arse beat down.
Posted by LSUMafia
Member since May 2005
9862 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 4:28 pm to
It's true. I remember reading about it. He got Crowton a raise and extension during the 2008 season.

Now, if that was wrong, then we held on to Crowton over a $469,000 buyout according to some? Do people realize how claiming his buyout was too much makes absolutely no sense?

I also believe after last season people were saying his buyout was close to $1 M, which would make sense at $938,000 if he had two years on it going into this season.
Posted by philthethrill
Member since May 2007
92 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 4:33 pm to
If he's owed less than half a million it shouldn't be too hard to buy him out. The easiest way is to tell his agent to start looking around.
I'm pretty sure firing him not would hurt bowl prep. After the season, is a different story.
Posted by ZTiger87
Member since Nov 2009
11536 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

Miles fought his arse off after 2008 to get his assistants 3-year deals particularly on offense, thus Studs and Crowton got 3 year deals starting in 2009.


That was after the national championship season. So 08-10.
Posted by SJTiger
Texas
Member since Sep 2005
1521 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 5:15 pm to
So who is correct here? Is this his last year on contract?
Posted by Tiger in Texas
Houston, Texas
Member since Sep 2004
20852 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

Miles fought his arse off after 2008 to get his assistants 3-year deals particularly on offense, thus Studs and Crowton got 3 year deals starting in 2009


And with the money they are getting, is it any wonder Studs didn't want to leave for Memphis last year...
Posted by LSUMafia
Member since May 2005
9862 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 6:07 pm to
I am not sure, but the word last year defending Miles for keeping him was that his ~$1 Million buyout was refused to be paid by the athletic department. If his contract ended this year, there is no way it was the reported $1 Million that BelowPar and others stated.
Posted by Tiger4Ever
Member since Aug 2003
36702 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

I am not sure, but the word last year defending Miles for keeping him was that his ~$1 Million buyout was refused to be paid by the athletic department. If his contract ended this year, there is no way it was the reported $1 Million that BelowPar and others stated.



Doesn't he make >$750M? I assume his buyout is simply whatever is remaining in his contract....so if he makes the $750M-$900M that is being thrown around, at the end of last season he would have been owed one year....or, $750M-900M.

I was under the impression that his contract was up after this season...which is why I am POSITIVE a change will happen. There would be no way his contract expires (if it actually did, or does) after this season and he is offered ANOTHER contract.

This wouldn't be a firing...it would simply be not retaining him. I just can't see Miles or LSU negotiating another contract with Crowton to keep him here.

Or so I tell myself....every day....every hour...

If I keep saying it, it will come true...
This post was edited on 11/28/10 at 6:16 pm
Posted by Martin Blank
Member since Sep 2005
397 posts
Posted on 11/28/10 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

It's true. I remember reading about it. He got Crowton a raise and extension during the 2008 season. Now, if that was wrong, then we held on to Crowton over a $469,000 buyout according to some? Do people realize how claiming his buyout was too much makes absolutely no sense?


You've got to take off your fan hat, and put on your thinking cap, when you think about this. Keep in mind that Alleva didn't hire Miles. And like baseball GM's with managers, you usually want to sink or swim with your own guy. So why give a coach you didn't hire, and who's just capped a 9 win season by losing a sloppy bowl game, $1 million to fix a mistake?

Now, I do not think Alleva wanted Les to fail, as he was making this call this past January. But by hiding behind the false excuse of not being able to afford the Crowton buyout, Alleva wins either way. If Les has a good year, as he did this year, great. Alleva has a winning coach on his hands to keep the Ath. Dept. train rolling. If not, though, it's easier to fire Les, and Alleva brings in his own guy.

Now, the dynamic has changed. With no worse than a 10-win season, Miles will deserve and get at least a 1 year extension. So Alleva essentially has to make Les "his guy," and is as invested in Miles' success as anyone else. More important, Crowton has no more than about a $500k buyout, and maybe none at all. Much easier for Alleva to OK paying $500k to help a coach he's now attached to at the hip, than $1 million to help a coach from whom, in January 2010, Alleva could have plausibly distanced himself.

Long/short, if Miles wants a new OC this year, as was rumored last year, it should be far more likely that he gets one.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram