- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The "Crowfferson" with Ridley?
Posted on 10/4/10 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 10/4/10 at 1:45 pm
Alot of yall know more about football than I do so maybe someone can explain how running the "Crowfferson" with Ridley, and last year with Scott makes more sense then running them from a power I.
I mean am I wrong here to think that 200+lb buriser backs are more effective running straight at a defense?
I mean am I wrong here to think that 200+lb buriser backs are more effective running straight at a defense?
1
Posted on 10/4/10 at 1:46 pm to Mike78
didn't you hear....JJ is a good runner
Posted on 10/4/10 at 1:47 pm to CptBengal
Since when? 
Posted on 10/4/10 at 1:48 pm to cajunjj
He did run for 83 yrds first play of the game. Without that score we lose.
Posted on 10/4/10 at 1:53 pm to CptBengal
quote:
JJ is a good runner
on draws, he obviously can be very productive. He surprised UThug, and then made a great juke of the Tenn LB/defender, and since the safeties cheated up. off to the races.
He is not a great runner, but a situationally effective runner. Problem is, he can't run all the run plays effectively, and is a poor passer, resigning LSU to a highly constrained and predictable offense, and subsequently an ineffective one.
I cannot come close to understanding how CLM does not see what is painfully obvious to everyone else (95+%, anyway).
This post was edited on 10/4/10 at 1:55 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News