- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Proof of block in the back on Julio's TD...
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:03 pm
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:03 pm
Play of the game? LOL.
You guys got screwed.
5
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:04 pm to gr82bAnAUTiger
Cheating must be fun.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:06 pm to BleedPurpleGold
getting away with penalties is a major part of winning games. we have done it plenty of times
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:08 pm to BleedPurpleGold
Cheating is fun if you dont get caught just ask bama who has largely gotten away with forever even though they suck at it and do get caught.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:10 pm to gr82bAnAUTiger
quote:
gr82bAnAUTiger
Starting your whining early aubie???
I cant wait until BLACK FRIDAY!
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:11 pm to UAalumnus
This is evidence of a truly sad condition called "post-defeat demoralization". After realizing that your pride and joy is inferior to it's opponent's, an excuse agenda immediately follows. Once the excuse becomes force fed to the masses, it makes the defeat easier to understand because of the common belief by like-minded individuals. The competition is now held in the argument of the excuse instead of the game itself.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:12 pm to Snatchy
quote:
This is evidence of a truly sad condition called "post-defeat demoralization". After realizing that your pride and joy is inferior to it's opponent's, an excuse agenda immediately follows. Once the excuse becomes force fed to the masses, it makes the defeat easier to understand because of the common belief by like-minded individuals. The competition is now held in the argument of the excuse instead of the game itself.
So I guess you're just going to troll around and post this in every single thread?
Cheater.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:12 pm to Snatchy
quote:
Snatchy
why do you redneck trolls litter our website. this is not gumpdroppings or thebearisalive.com
get the frick out
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:13 pm to Snatchy
To be honest, it's unfair to take that snapshot and use it as proof or argument that there should have been a block-in-the-back call. If you watch the play in real time, it was very quick, very brief, and the OL appeared to barely touch our DB. Could it have been called? Sure. But it wasn't terribly obvious while the play was developing.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:14 pm to UAalumnus
quote:
Starting your whining early aubie???
I cant wait until BLACK FRIDAY!
What I'm hearing from you is you recognize there was a block in the back, and the TD shouldn't have counted, but you simply don't care.
Does that about sum it up?
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:14 pm to Snatchy
quote:
This is evidence of a truly sad condition called "post-defeat demoralization". After realizing that your pride and joy is inferior to it's opponent's, an excuse agenda immediately follows. Once the excuse becomes force fed to the masses, it makes the defeat easier to understand because of the common belief by like-minded individuals. The competition is now held in the argument of the excuse instead of the game itself.
Incidentally, there is evidence that you JUST signed up on this board FOLLOWING a victory by UA. We call that "douchebaggery". It's kind of like being a pussy...but on the Internet.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:14 pm to Snatchy
quote:
This is evidence of a truly sad condition called "post-defeat demoralization". After realizing that your pride and joy is inferior to it's opponent's, an excuse agenda immediately follows. Once the excuse becomes force fed to the masses, it makes the defeat easier to understand because of the common belief by like-minded individuals. The competition is now held in the argument of the excuse instead of the game itself.
This coming from the same fan base that blamed Fulmer for the Albert Means 'recruitment'.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:14 pm to Snatchy
Your logic would be true if indeed the blantantly missed calls were made during a blowout of LSU by Bama. Unfortunately for your logic, both teams were neck-in-neck, the officials had SEVERAL missed and no-calls, and obviously aren't very good at what they do.
Who are you to say that your players are better and that the missed call wouldn't have affected the outcome of the game?
In an instance such as this, in which even the majority of the BAMA fanbase agreed that Peterson should've been given the pick, i think you're logic sucks arse, frankly.
Who are you to say that your players are better and that the missed call wouldn't have affected the outcome of the game?
In an instance such as this, in which even the majority of the BAMA fanbase agreed that Peterson should've been given the pick, i think you're logic sucks arse, frankly.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:15 pm to Come2Conquer
Evidence keeps rolling in, I'm compiling it in a text document. No more victories here, but I do love stirring shite up.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:16 pm to Snatchy
You must have read up on this after last year's Utah game. Right?
This post was edited on 11/8/09 at 7:17 pm
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:20 pm to Come2Conquer
quote:you can seen 77 was illegaly down feild.
time, it was very quick, very brief, and the OL appeared to barely touch our DB. Could it have been called? Sure. But it wasn't terribly obvious while the play was developing.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:21 pm to tigerswin03
quote:
you can seen 77 was illegaly down feild.
My wife & I were discussing this earlier. It seemed more obvious to me than the block-in-the-back. However, I'm not an astute observer of NCAA CFB rules, so I don't know if he could've been flagged for it. Isn't it the case that the OL can move downfield after the WR has possession?
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:21 pm to tigerswin03
quote:
you can seen 77 was illegaly down feild.
wasn't the pass behind the LOS?
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:22 pm to tigerswin03
quote:Actually, I'll stand up for Alabama on that one. The pass was behind the line of scrimmage, and therefore the OL is allowed to be downfield. Nothing illegal about #77 being there. Now putting his hands on the LSU player's back (the same player that barely missed the tackle) is another story.
you can seen 77 was illegaly down feild.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:22 pm to bmy
(no message)
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News