- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Watchmen
Posted on 3/17/09 at 5:43 am
Posted on 3/17/09 at 5:43 am
I thought is sucked. Anybody else think so or am I alone in this.
Posted on 3/17/09 at 5:54 am to phelps4824
SloFloPro does, but his opinion doesn't matter. I thought it did not live up to the books' potential, but could it have? I don't know. Wrong director, good cast, too many porno scenes.
Posted on 3/17/09 at 8:01 am to phelps4824
I thought it was alright, but if they would have cut about 25-35 min from it, it could have been good.
Posted on 3/17/09 at 8:03 am to ctalati32
It looks like I am in the minority, but I loved it.
Posted on 3/17/09 at 8:07 am to buzwa
quote:
It looks like I am in the minority, but I loved it.
+1. I read the book so the movie was better for me then it was for people who didn't read the book. I admit the movie is full of flaws but I enjoyed the cool visuals and the story. I enjoyed it (3 times already), but I can still see why others don't like it so much.
Posted on 3/17/09 at 8:10 am to buzwa
quote:
It looks like I am in the minority, but I loved it.
I really liked it too. I went in with lowered expectations because I realized a lot was changed from the graphic novel to get it onto the screen. That being said I do think having previously read it helped a great deal.
Posted on 3/17/09 at 8:21 am to TIGERSTORM
ah the blue dick!
I didn't even notice it till halfway through the movie then it was there!!!
If they would have cut 45min out of the movie it probably would be okay.
I didn't even notice it till halfway through the movie then it was there!!!
If they would have cut 45min out of the movie it probably would be okay.
Posted on 3/17/09 at 8:35 am to BAMBAM
it had good cinematography and music, but was too fanboyish for me...
This post was edited on 3/17/09 at 8:36 am
Posted on 3/17/09 at 8:40 am to The Levee
quote:
it had good cinematography and music, but was too fanboyish for me...
All of my friends said the exact same thing. I see where you're coming from... whether or not someone read the book determines everything IMO (like most adaptations).
Regardless, the cinematography was great.
Posted on 3/17/09 at 9:05 am to The Levee
I liked it a lot. Saw it in an IMAX, so the audio/visuals were further heightened.
Posted on 3/17/09 at 9:10 am to Leauxgan
yeah watching it in IMAX musta been an experience, Dr. Bluedick is awesome.
This post was edited on 3/17/09 at 9:19 am
Posted on 3/17/09 at 9:13 am to Leauxgan
I saw it and it was alright. I have read the graphic so when I was driving home from the theatre I felt like the last 2 and 1/2 hours were pretty pointless. I have already seen the story in graphic representation from the graphic novel. It was just those same shots but in movie form. It felt like I was just rehashing what I had already done but in an inferior way. It wasn't bad but if I had to do it again I would have skipped it. I also found it weird that the first 2:30 stays so true to the book only to be dramatically changed. I know all the arguments on why the ending had to be changed but still it just was weird to me. The movie to me really shows what Alan Moore was talking about when he says alot of Hollywood and movies are just spoonfeeding us. It seemed to be the watchman being spoonfeed to us. Just read the graphic novel.
Posted on 3/17/09 at 9:32 am to Bucky
quote:
+1. I read the book so the movie was better for me then it was for people who didn't read the book. I admit the movie is full of flaws but I enjoyed the cool visuals and the story. I enjoyed it (2 times), but I can still see why others don't like it so much
Posted on 3/17/09 at 9:33 am to booga
i can't think of a movie i have seen recently that was better.
Posted on 3/17/09 at 9:33 am to DanglingFury
quote:
+1. I read the book so
i'm reading it now
Posted on 3/17/09 at 9:48 am to manwich
I thought it was good, but not great. It was definitely worth the money and time. I have not read the graphic novel, and the story was not compelling enough to make me do so, but at least I was entertained for a few hours.
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:16 am to Bucky
quote:
+1. I read the book so the movie was better for me then it was for people who didn't read the book.
i've never read the book but really enjoyed the movie. i'm interested in going back to read the novel. my wife thought it was pretty boring, though.
Posted on 3/17/09 at 11:39 am to phelps4824
quote:
I thought is sucked.
I thought is great.
seriously, I really liked it. I actually haven't met anyone yet who didn't like it, and I'm the only one I know who's read the book.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News