Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

KW for heisman

Posted on 11/15/08 at 5:51 pm
Posted by Kellydown
Ciudad del Carmen Mexico
Member since Oct 2008
372 posts
Posted on 11/15/08 at 5:51 pm
Just imagine if KW got the ball 35 times a game like KF did back in the late 90's. Be cereal we would be talking heisman right now.
Posted by Etiger83
'dis meat baby mine ya erd
Member since Oct 2004
13150 posts
Posted on 11/15/08 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

Be cereal


Posted by NationalChampionLSU
...til I die
Member since Aug 2004
8313 posts
Posted on 11/15/08 at 5:52 pm to
Germans ?
Posted by ColeLSU
Member since Jul 2008
5856 posts
Posted on 11/15/08 at 5:52 pm to
There are several puzzling aspects from that post, including the overall idea of it...
Posted by supaman
ridgeland, ms
Member since Jul 2007
232 posts
Posted on 11/15/08 at 5:53 pm to
all he does....is score touchdowns.
Posted by tubucoco
las vegas, nevada
Member since Oct 2007
32994 posts
Posted on 11/15/08 at 5:55 pm to
but don't play at all , so what the frick.
This post was edited on 11/15/08 at 5:56 pm
Posted by Kellydown
Ciudad del Carmen Mexico
Member since Oct 2008
372 posts
Posted on 11/15/08 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

but don't play at all , so what the frick.


Agreed
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
27465 posts
Posted on 11/15/08 at 5:57 pm to
how can you question Charles Scott? it's not like he's Hester.
Posted by tubucoco
las vegas, nevada
Member since Oct 2007
32994 posts
Posted on 11/15/08 at 6:00 pm to
c'mon slack, I felt C Scott should have been runnin more last year when Hester was dominating the carries
This post was edited on 11/15/08 at 6:01 pm
Posted by Kellydown
Ciudad del Carmen Mexico
Member since Oct 2008
372 posts
Posted on 11/15/08 at 6:01 pm to
Charles Scott is a hell of a back, but he's no KW (touchdown machine, superman, world beater)
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
58955 posts
Posted on 11/15/08 at 6:02 pm to
KW is not good enough to sniff Kevin Faulk's jockstrap
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
21943 posts
Posted on 11/15/08 at 6:03 pm to
Not sure if KW is even our second best back...
Posted by Kellydown
Ciudad del Carmen Mexico
Member since Oct 2008
372 posts
Posted on 11/15/08 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

KW is not good enough to sniff Kevin Faulk's jockstrap


Step away from the crack pipe
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
58955 posts
Posted on 11/15/08 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

Not sure if KW is even our second best back...



Honestly, I think Ridley will wind up being better than KW. Though, I don't think Richard Murphy will. I actually think Ridley could be better than Scott in a couple of years.
Posted by Geauxtiga
No man's land
Member since Jan 2008
34377 posts
Posted on 11/15/08 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

Honestly, I think Ridley will wind up being better than KW.
Agree, sadly cause I liked KW (Still do) but he's not measuring up to what I'd expected. He has improved but still far from a back that can run tween the tackles.
Posted by Kellydown
Ciudad del Carmen Mexico
Member since Oct 2008
372 posts
Posted on 11/15/08 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

he's not measuring up to what I'd expected. He has improved but still far from a back that can run tween the tackles.

Lack of touches
Posted by Kellydown
Ciudad del Carmen Mexico
Member since Oct 2008
372 posts
Posted on 11/15/08 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

Not sure if KW is even our second best back...


Your right, he is our best back
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram