Started By
Message

re: Would you guys make this firearm trade?

Posted on 8/18/17 at 3:51 pm to
Posted by rgsa
La.
Member since May 2015
2355 posts
Posted on 8/18/17 at 3:51 pm to
Swap if you want. Thats a nice looking S/W though.
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
24896 posts
Posted on 8/18/17 at 4:35 pm to
New, I'd agree.

6mths down the road? Not anywhere close.
Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
10545 posts
Posted on 8/18/17 at 4:37 pm to
Is that the actual revolver? I would say if your Smith has the Hilary hole, trade it. If not, keep it.
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35555 posts
Posted on 8/18/17 at 5:04 pm to
I'm not sure what you mean by the Hillary hole but here's an actual photo of mine...

Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16524 posts
Posted on 8/18/17 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

I'm not sure what you mean by the Hillary hole but here's an actual photo of mine...


It's the built-in trigger lock S&W started putting in the revolvers in 1994 or 1995 in capitulation to the Clinton administration. The hole for the key is above the cylinder release. It's about aesthetics and the principle of the matter, if yours doesn't have the lock then you do not want to trade it in this deal.
This post was edited on 8/18/17 at 5:11 pm
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 8/18/17 at 5:11 pm to
Such a travesty that s&w seems to have zero plans of doing away with
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16524 posts
Posted on 8/18/17 at 5:12 pm to
I think the make some current models without them but they really need to make them CA-only and produce non-lock models for the free-er states.
This post was edited on 8/18/17 at 5:13 pm
Posted by Geauxtiga
No man's land
Member since Jan 2008
34377 posts
Posted on 8/18/17 at 5:13 pm to
I wouldn't trade.
Posted by Buck_Rogers
Member since Jul 2013
1828 posts
Posted on 8/18/17 at 6:14 pm to
Being a 686-4 makes it more sought after than later ones like the 686-5 and 686-6 which is the current model. 686-4 was the last model before they switched to MIM parts and the awful internal lock that is on all new 686-6 revolvers.
Posted by Judge Smails
Native Son of NELA
Member since Mar 2008
5515 posts
Posted on 8/18/17 at 9:44 pm to
I own a 686 Smith with a six inch barrel and there is no way in hell I'd trade it for a Remington 1911.
Posted by BrotherEsau
Member since Aug 2011
3500 posts
Posted on 8/18/17 at 10:12 pm to
I have a 686-1 with 6". I would never trade it or sell it. Best shooting gun I own. Bought it at a local range. They also had a -6 with 2.5" barrel. I couldn't decide so I got them both. The -6 is my second best shooter.

Don't do it.
Posted by Got Blaze
Youngsville
Member since Dec 2013
8699 posts
Posted on 8/19/17 at 1:04 am to
quote:

I've always wanted a 6" .357, but I'd prefer to have a Colt Pyton mainly because I'm a big Walking Dead fan


No way in hell I'd make that trade. There's a reason why your friend wants your 686 so bad. The Smith is built 10x's better than the Remington. Would not be surprised if Big Green discontinued the R1 pistol in next 5 yrs.

If you are serious about the Python, you better budget $3000 plus.
Posted by mallardhank
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2006
1274 posts
Posted on 8/19/17 at 6:24 am to
1911's are everywhere made by everyone. That does not mean they are all good. Friend just got a full size kimber and it won't shoot accurately for anything.
That pre-lock smith is a damn fine gun. Do not let it go
Just because the prices for each are similar does not mean the value and quality are also.
Save up and buy a Sig 1911 if you have to have one.
Posted by unclejhim
Folsom, La.
Member since Nov 2011
3703 posts
Posted on 8/19/17 at 6:49 am to
I have the same gun.....SW 686 w 4" barrel. Best shooting gun I own. The only thing I would trade it for would be your 6" model. I'd like to have a 1911 but there is no way in hell I sell my 686.
This post was edited on 8/19/17 at 3:06 pm
Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
15277 posts
Posted on 8/19/17 at 10:05 am to
A buddy of mine just sold his python for 4K. It's obnoxious.
Posted by dawg23
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jul 2011
5065 posts
Posted on 8/19/17 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

but the reviews I've seen on this one are very positive.
The more you deal with guns, the more you'll realize that there are rarely any negative reviews published in gun magazines.

Not saying that gun rags are the source of your reviews -- just stating. The gun rags get too much advertising revenue from gun makers, holster makers, ammo makers, et al to say anything negative about these products. One will commonly see a pistol test report saying the gun had "virtually" no malfunctions or some such BS.

As far as internet reviews -- yet to see one that impressed me. Most are just the typical recitation of features.

As far as issues with the R1911, just Google "Remington 1911 problems" -- there are plenty. This is just one example: LINK

Again, I (just me) won't be buying anything made by Remington.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81564 posts
Posted on 8/19/17 at 7:31 pm to
quote:

gun magazines.
I don't read those. People, not mags.

In any event, none of that would make me want that revolver more than the 1911.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram