Started By
Message
locked post

New Rifle/Optics or Old Rifle/Expensive Optics Help Me Decide

Posted on 4/16/13 at 8:45 am
Posted by 633tiger
Member since Jun 2007
1230 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 8:45 am
My current "go to" deer slayer is a Remington 7600 with bushnel optics. They were both brand new 20 years ago when I got them for my 18th bday. I desperately need to upgrade my optics but here's my problem. I've always wanted a high end scope ($1200) but can't bring myself to pull the trigger when I know for $1200 I could get both new gun and optics.

Help me decide!!!!
Posted by oleyeller
Vols, Bitch
Member since Oct 2012
32015 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 8:48 am to
never bought a "high end" scope... never noticed. put a nikon or leupold on there for $250-350 and never know the difference. unless you are using it for 1000 yard shots or something then pay $1200 for a scope
Posted by HunhBruh
South Louisiana
Member since Oct 2011
234 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 9:00 am to
buy the scope. your eyes are 20 years older
Posted by 007mag
Death Valley, Sec. 408
Member since Dec 2011
3873 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 9:17 am to
New bolt gun and new mid level scope. Or keep what you got since it's worked for 20 years and go buy a new bow completely rigged out and ready to hunt or a new 3-1/2" duck gun.
Posted by 633tiger
Member since Jun 2007
1230 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 9:23 am to
I've already got the bow and shot gun and plenty other guns. The scope needs to be replaced regardless. It's got so many scratches its like looking thru a screen.
Posted by hardhead
stinky bayou
Member since Jun 2009
5745 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 9:26 am to
just put a new scope on the ole war horse.

most older rifles are better anyway. Especially early 50's models and older
Posted by Tigerpaw123
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2007
17251 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 9:27 am to
Spend money on glass not metal, if your pump gun can shoot a 1 inch group at 100 yards I would buy the scope now, put it on the old rifle, and start saving for a new bolt action and just transfer the scope once you get a new gun
Posted by HebertFest08
The Coast
Member since Aug 2008
6392 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 9:46 am to
I sold high end guns/optics/equipment for several years.....
don't waste the money on a new rifle and iffy optics, just buy optics. 30mm Swarovski or Schmidt and Bender and thank me later. Also, don't go cheap on the mounts, buy the best you can afford... at least the leupold brand mounting systems.
your gun im sure is fairly accurate, you can't shoot what you can't see. If you want to compare before you buy go to the store at night or late evening and ask them to go with you outside to compare. Also helps if said store has a dark alley or isn't brightly lit around the area....
Posted by 633tiger
Member since Jun 2007
1230 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 10:18 am to
Is the 30mm that much better than the 1in?
Posted by dat yat
Chef Pass
Member since Jun 2011
4298 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 10:23 am to
After having a $30 Bushnell Sharpshooter on my Model 70 for about 25 years, last year I put a Luepold VXII 33mm 2-7. (It was around $200ish using Cabela points.) It was a step up in glass quality and I will probably use that combo until someone inherits it from me.
If the rifle is reliable, keep it and top it with the scope you want.
Posted by HebertFest08
The Coast
Member since Aug 2008
6392 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Is the 30mm that much better than the 1in?

Yes. If you can afford $1200 save up a little more money and drop the money man. Used them both, one of the perks of working where I did... Had access to everything and was able to shoot tons of rifles...
Posted by Ice Cream Sammich
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
10110 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:02 am to
I bought a nice scope a few years back and do not regret the decision at all. The scope cost more than the gun and I am perfectly fine with that. I bought a Swaro Z3 4-12x50 and love it. It retailed normally for $1300 but got it for a hair over $800 on black Friday.

Would I normally spend that much on a scope? No. However, I do believe in having one nice setup after getting this one. My other scopes are all Nikons.

Swarovoski Z3 4-12x50
Browning X-Bolt 300WSM
Posted by HebertFest08
The Coast
Member since Aug 2008
6392 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 11:59 am to
Time and time again we sold entire set ups with rifles that were cheaper than the optics... Most rifles shoot well and if they don't its typically the shooter, ammo and or optics. shite, couldn't count the number of times I'd put a 30mm Swarovski or Zeiss on a Tikka... what would burn my arse would be someone spending $1300 on a Sako or a Weatherby Accumark and stick a damn $300 scope on it.... Doesn't work well that way. Buy a good scope and put the best mounts you can afford on it. It will make all the difference in the world. I didn't use Schmidt and Bender in my reference b/c they are in the 2k range. They are better than the others no doubt, but 2k on a scope is a big pill to swallow for most. We generally put them on Accumarks, Sakos, Dakotas and some custom guns that came through like Jarretts and such.
Posted by Ice Cream Sammich
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
10110 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Time and time again we sold entire set ups with rifles that were cheaper than the optics...

By no means was I saying that this was rare. Its typical. And I agree, spend as much as you can on the glass and then get a gun with whats left over.
Posted by 633tiger
Member since Jun 2007
1230 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 12:27 pm to
The ole 7600 definately shoots straight and it would be hard to retire the ole boy.
With a budget of +\- $1200 what's my best couple options on glass. I'm mostly concerned with low light conditions and reliability. Long range shots are not an issue.
Posted by Ice Cream Sammich
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
10110 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 12:39 pm to
Leupold, Swarovoski, Zeiss, Nikon, etc.

Not in any particular order.
Posted by 633tiger
Member since Jun 2007
1230 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 12:43 pm to
Most of my family and friends have Leopold and Nikon. They all love what they have but I want better. Are is there better I that price range?
Posted by Ice Cream Sammich
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
10110 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 12:45 pm to
I normally use Nikon and my dad normally uses Leupold. His Leupolds are slightly better but my Nikons are slightly cheaper.

My Swaro is heads and shoulders better than either brands. It retails for around 1k now. However, lots of stores have huge sales on scopes too. I have not used a Zeiss but they get good reviews too.
Posted by Tigerpaw123
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2007
17251 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 12:48 pm to
Swarovoski

Swarovski Z3 Riflescope at Cabela's Quantity: 1 Price: Reg: $1,349.99 Sale: $1,059.99 each

4x12 -50

with ballistic turret

only a 1 inch tube but a great piece of glass
This post was edited on 4/16/13 at 12:49 pm
Posted by Ice Cream Sammich
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
10110 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 12:49 pm to
I highly recommend the aforementioned scope.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram