Started By
Message
locked post

Mack's prairie wings waders

Posted on 8/23/13 at 10:38 am
Posted by joshric
Fairhope, AL
Member since Jul 2012
178 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 10:38 am
Any OB reviews on their 2013 big ditch waders? Or reviews on their waders from the past. My 5 yr old lacrosse waders have one too many holes now
Posted by tkr1407
Nawfiest Laweezianna
Member since Aug 2011
3132 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 10:42 am to
I don't know anything about them, but I've had 2 pair of Lacrosse and I don't see myself changing anytime soon. One piece of advice that I have for waders is, pay the extra money for better quality.
Posted by sloopy
Member since Aug 2009
6883 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 10:46 am to
Cabellas all day.
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38719 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 10:46 am to
I had Lacrosse and switched to the MPW Big Ditch.

Nothing wrong with lacrosse, mine just got old and eventually leaked after a few seasons.

Anyway, back to the big ditch, I bought them because I got an e-mail about them going on sale. They are the baddest waders I've ever had from the ankle up. My only complaint is the sole of the boot feels thin. No leaks, but I can feel every little stick I step on making me think it's not thick enough. This will be my second season in them this year.
Posted by Choirboy
On your property
Member since Aug 2010
10777 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 10:49 am to
The ultra touch sole is by design to help with foot placement when wading through water with obstructions or the ground isn't slick.
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38719 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 10:51 am to
quote:

The ultra touch sole is by design to help with foot placement when wading through water with obstructions or the ground isn't slick.


Design or not, it's still a complaint from my field testing.
Posted by hardhead
stinky bayou
Member since Jun 2009
5745 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 10:56 am to
i will probably wear my sperrys this year
Posted by joshric
Fairhope, AL
Member since Jul 2012
178 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 11:18 am to
I've heard good things about them and I called to order them from that sale last year but who ever I talked to said to wait for the 2013 model to come out. Apparently there was a common complaint and they tried to address it this year.

Something I've discovered that I couldnt stand about my lacrosse waders was the buckle suspenders. The butt of my gun would be on the plastic buckle and just aggravate the hell out of me. But I used my doctor brain and only buckled the left side to solve that problem
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38719 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 11:22 am to
quote:

only buckled the left side to solve that problem


You can also unbuckle both, let them out and use them as a belt, that's why the buckles are reversed on each shoulder.

MPW Big Ditch have it's own belt already though.
Posted by 34venture
Buffer Zone
Member since Mar 2010
11369 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 12:32 pm to
I will be giving them a shot this winter...I think.
Posted by pleg20
Member since May 2011
14 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 12:48 pm to
I got a pair last year and like the way they fit. I only got them in the 3.5 mm neoprene and really couldn't tell a difference on the cold mornings between the last 5 mm lacrosse waders that leaked in the crotch after one year and the thinner neoprene
Posted by CadesCove
Mounting the Woman
Member since Oct 2006
40828 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

Cabellas all day.


That's what my current pair is.
Posted by Palo Gaucho
Benton
Member since Jul 2013
3333 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 1:57 pm to
I've had a pair of the 3.5 mm for the past two seasons. They've been great. No problems at all. They're pretty basic, buts that what I like. I also feel like I have more flexibility in them them vs. Drake which seem really stiff. I'm not sure who makes them for Mack's but my guess is Lacross.
Posted by joshric
Fairhope, AL
Member since Jul 2012
178 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 5:17 pm to
Thanks y'all. My mind was basically made up to get them just wanted to see if anyone had any issues here.
Posted by Polar Pop
Member since Feb 2012
10748 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

Drake which seem really stiff


Ive had the Drake LST 1300 or 1600 grams for the past 3 or 4 seasons. Aside from the major crotch leak, I dread wearing them due to extreme sweating and not being able to move. They are built like a straight jacket for the klondike.

Probably grab some Macks next year due to the good reviews here.
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
19580 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 5:41 pm to
I will be investing in a new pair here shortly. Trying to decide between 3.5 or 5mm. Besides maybe a trip or two to ARK I will mostly be hunting in SLA. Any preference for one over the other?
Posted by Polar Pop
Member since Feb 2012
10748 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 5:46 pm to
3.5, thank me later. If you do run into some freak cold weather just throw another layer on.
Posted by Palo Gaucho
Benton
Member since Jul 2013
3333 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 5:48 pm to
I'm hot natured, so I always opt for the 3.5 mm. It never really gets cold heat anyway maybe mid 20's a couple of times a year. My hunting partner just ordered the 5mm but he has the internal thermostat of an 80 year old woman.
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
19580 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 6:23 pm to
Yea I am hot natured as well, looks like 3.5 it is.
Posted by Redfish2010
Member since Jul 2007
15168 posts
Posted on 8/23/13 at 8:53 pm to
The 2013 is on the website. I assume that the new model? I'm interested in looking at these over the lacrosse brush tuff I have now. They've been god but have a few leaks in em
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram