- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Mack's prairie wings waders
Posted on 8/23/13 at 10:38 am
Posted on 8/23/13 at 10:38 am
Any OB reviews on their 2013 big ditch waders? Or reviews on their waders from the past. My 5 yr old lacrosse waders have one too many holes now
Posted on 8/23/13 at 10:42 am to joshric
I don't know anything about them, but I've had 2 pair of Lacrosse and I don't see myself changing anytime soon. One piece of advice that I have for waders is, pay the extra money for better quality.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 10:46 am to joshric
I had Lacrosse and switched to the MPW Big Ditch.
Nothing wrong with lacrosse, mine just got old and eventually leaked after a few seasons.
Anyway, back to the big ditch, I bought them because I got an e-mail about them going on sale. They are the baddest waders I've ever had from the ankle up. My only complaint is the sole of the boot feels thin. No leaks, but I can feel every little stick I step on making me think it's not thick enough. This will be my second season in them this year.
Nothing wrong with lacrosse, mine just got old and eventually leaked after a few seasons.
Anyway, back to the big ditch, I bought them because I got an e-mail about them going on sale. They are the baddest waders I've ever had from the ankle up. My only complaint is the sole of the boot feels thin. No leaks, but I can feel every little stick I step on making me think it's not thick enough. This will be my second season in them this year.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 10:49 am to Clyde Tipton
The ultra touch sole is by design to help with foot placement when wading through water with obstructions or the ground isn't slick.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 10:51 am to Choirboy
quote:
The ultra touch sole is by design to help with foot placement when wading through water with obstructions or the ground isn't slick.
Design or not, it's still a complaint from my field testing.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 10:56 am to Clyde Tipton
i will probably wear my sperrys this year
Posted on 8/23/13 at 11:18 am to Clyde Tipton
I've heard good things about them and I called to order them from that sale last year but who ever I talked to said to wait for the 2013 model to come out. Apparently there was a common complaint and they tried to address it this year.
Something I've discovered that I couldnt stand about my lacrosse waders was the buckle suspenders. The butt of my gun would be on the plastic buckle and just aggravate the hell out of me. But I used my doctor brain and only buckled the left side to solve that problem
Something I've discovered that I couldnt stand about my lacrosse waders was the buckle suspenders. The butt of my gun would be on the plastic buckle and just aggravate the hell out of me. But I used my doctor brain and only buckled the left side to solve that problem
Posted on 8/23/13 at 11:22 am to joshric
quote:
only buckled the left side to solve that problem
You can also unbuckle both, let them out and use them as a belt, that's why the buckles are reversed on each shoulder.
MPW Big Ditch have it's own belt already though.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 12:32 pm to joshric
I will be giving them a shot this winter...I think.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 12:48 pm to 34venture
I got a pair last year and like the way they fit. I only got them in the 3.5 mm neoprene and really couldn't tell a difference on the cold mornings between the last 5 mm lacrosse waders that leaked in the crotch after one year and the thinner neoprene
Posted on 8/23/13 at 1:41 pm to sloopy
quote:
Cabellas all day.
That's what my current pair is.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 1:57 pm to joshric
I've had a pair of the 3.5 mm for the past two seasons. They've been great. No problems at all. They're pretty basic, buts that what I like. I also feel like I have more flexibility in them them vs. Drake which seem really stiff. I'm not sure who makes them for Mack's but my guess is Lacross.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 5:17 pm to Palo Gaucho
Thanks y'all. My mind was basically made up to get them just wanted to see if anyone had any issues here.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 5:28 pm to Palo Gaucho
quote:
Drake which seem really stiff
Ive had the Drake LST 1300 or 1600 grams for the past 3 or 4 seasons. Aside from the major crotch leak, I dread wearing them due to extreme sweating and not being able to move. They are built like a straight jacket for the klondike.
Probably grab some Macks next year due to the good reviews here.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 5:41 pm to Polar Pop
I will be investing in a new pair here shortly. Trying to decide between 3.5 or 5mm. Besides maybe a trip or two to ARK I will mostly be hunting in SLA. Any preference for one over the other?
Posted on 8/23/13 at 5:46 pm to GREENHEAD22
3.5, thank me later. If you do run into some freak cold weather just throw another layer on.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 5:48 pm to GREENHEAD22
I'm hot natured, so I always opt for the 3.5 mm. It never really gets cold heat anyway maybe mid 20's a couple of times a year. My hunting partner just ordered the 5mm but he has the internal thermostat of an 80 year old woman.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 6:23 pm to Palo Gaucho
Yea I am hot natured as well, looks like 3.5 it is.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 8:53 pm to joshric
The 2013 is on the website. I assume that the new model? I'm interested in looking at these over the lacrosse brush tuff I have now. They've been god but have a few leaks in em
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News