Started By
Message

Grand Isle tar balls

Posted on 7/12/15 at 6:16 pm
Posted by kjntgr
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8482 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 6:16 pm
Hung out on beach Sat. afternoon for a few hours. Collected at least 20 tar balls anywhere from the size of golfball to softball. Not good!
Posted by Spankum
Miss-sippi
Member since Jan 2007
55940 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 6:18 pm to
wow...I didn't realize there was still a lot of that stuff floating around out there...
Posted by QuietTiger
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2003
26256 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 6:18 pm to
But, BP's our friend……..
Posted by CP3
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
7398 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 6:24 pm to
That's why I had no problem taking money from them.

Thanks for the power poles BP
Posted by TigerWise
Front Seat of an Uber
Member since Sep 2010
35113 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 7:00 pm to
The trout must not like the tar balls
Posted by DzNtz
BR
Member since Oct 2007
684 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 7:18 pm to
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 7:55 pm to
If I understand what you are talking about, to be accurate, they are called Surface Residue Balls(SRBs) which are different from actual tar balls. But yes. They are continuously washed ashore and also uncovered when the surface sand is blown away (winter especially)



I know something on the OB
This post was edited on 7/12/15 at 7:57 pm
Posted by kjntgr
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8482 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 8:23 pm to
These were hard black substances about like a hocky puck.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 8:24 pm to
Gotcha. We aren't seeing many tar balls anymore on Fourchon.
Posted by doublecutter
Hear & Their
Member since Oct 2003
6567 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 8:27 pm to
There are beaches on the east coast where tar balls wash up that came from tankers sunk by German U boats during WWII
Posted by kjntgr
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8482 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 8:28 pm to
Jimbeam. How long do you think these will be out there? Are they harmful to anything?
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 8:31 pm to
Not sure on the lifespan of tar balls. SRBs can be completely gone in as little as a few months. There are obviously carcinogenic compounds in oil but luckily no animals are really going to eat them. One risk is leaching into groundwater.
Posted by kjntgr
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8482 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 8:34 pm to
I guess I was surprised to see si much of it.
Posted by Spankum
Miss-sippi
Member since Jan 2007
55940 posts
Posted on 7/12/15 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

There are beaches on the east coast where tar balls wash up that came from tankers sunk by German U boats during WWII


I think a lot of them come from natural petroleum seeps, too...they are an inconvenience, but nothing to get real shook up over either...
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
36791 posts
Posted on 7/13/15 at 5:04 am to
"Tar balls" have been washing up on shore since I was a kid (70s). We used to get them on our feet every summer in GI. It's not a BP oil spill thing, this shite has been happening for years. Doubt there is any environmental impact.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27813 posts
Posted on 7/13/15 at 5:38 am to
Oil seepage is naturally occurring. So just seeing them in areas of heavy oil production doesn't necessarily mean it came from the BP spill. In fact, places see a reduction in tar balls as oil is extracted. It's been a long time since the BP spill. Seems like it would be mostly gone by now. I'd say it's unrelated.
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
19575 posts
Posted on 7/13/15 at 5:58 am to
Exactly, been happening forever, natural seepage, happens in Cali as well.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
29963 posts
Posted on 7/13/15 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Oil seepage is naturally occurring. So just seeing them in areas of heavy oil production doesn't necessarily mean it came from the BP spill. In fact, places see a reduction in tar balls as oil is extracted. It's been a long time since the BP spill. Seems like it would be mostly gone by now. I'd say it's unrelated.


so in this thread, alone we have a disparity in information.

some guys are saying; f--- BP, they ruined our coase, when others are saying, that it's naturally occurring.

the best way to settle this is to ask, did the tar balls wash up BEFORE the spill? if so, then you cannot accurately attribute this to BP.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15169 posts
Posted on 7/13/15 at 9:19 am to
quote:

so in this thread, alone we have a disparity in information.

some guys are saying; f--- BP, they ruined our coase, when others are saying, that it's naturally occurring.

the best way to settle this is to ask, did the tar balls wash up BEFORE the spill? if so, then you cannot accurately attribute this to BP.


Some certainly did, but not at the same rate as they have post-DWH. They can be tested and when significant mats have been found recently, they've almost all been Macondo oil.
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 7/13/15 at 9:23 am to
quote:

when significant mats have been found


That's not what they are talking about

I remember in the 80's they had those all over the beaches in GI
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram