re: Bump/Slide stocks are flying off the shelves

i dont think you understand the definition of compromise...in political terms it's common meaning is "give & take".

for example...
1) accept a ban on or heavily regulated bump-fire stocks
2) in return, pass national right-to-carry reciprocity

nobody cared about bump fire stocks before monday. like i said before, i was amazed that they are legal, but certainly they were not a topic of conversation and i venture that not 5 in 100 americans even knew what they were. this is an opportunity to get something in return, ie "compromise"

quote:

---

i dont think you understand the definition of compromise...in political terms it's common meaning is "give & take".

for example...
1) accept a ban on or heavily regulated bump-fire stocks
2) in return, pass national right-to-carry reciprocity

---

I dont think you understand how the world works outside of a dictionary. Are those the terms? They give us back something they took and take something else? By my count were still down one in that arrangement. How does that play out at the state level? What did Californians get in return for the assault weapon ban, what did other localities get in return for magazine bans, what did we get in return for the Clinton ban, the GCA, the NFA?

quote:

---

dems draft a bill banning slide fire
GOP attaches a right to carry amendment
the bill is agreed upon in conference

---

Anyone who thinks this will happen ignores everything that has ever happened with gun control. We already have a right to carry btw, it's called the 2A. Fight for it. Don't fight for new laws. Fight for the existing provisions of the constitution that have been trampled on.

Did you fight tooth and nail for Jarts? I really liked them. Now, all they have is these stupid Nerf ones that aren't even dangerous.

Did you vehemently oppose the new bullshite gas cans? Everyone hates those.

Like I said earlier, I am not a politician, but this seems like a tactic that the NRA will use to get some concessions. They can stick something on there because, hey, who is gonna be the a-hole to go against a bill that would ban what happened? Or maybe they have something else in the works?

Washington is a cesspool. We all know that. They do shady shite 100x a day.

It isn't an issue for me, so yes, I see it as a compromise on something I'm willing to let go. I believe that the NRA gave up so easily because they have something in the works

quote:

---

We Already should be able to universally carry

---

I thought this said university. You can bring your shite to school, as long as it stays in your vehicle

Don't lie man, you wish you would've fought that. We all do

quote:

---

who is gonna be the a-hole to go against a bill that would ban what happened?

---

How the frick can you say that? He used a crank trigger or whatever. Big deal. He still had a dozen guns and thousands of rounds of ammo. That dude planned and prepared for this for years.

If he hadn't found crank trigger, he'd have figured out another way. He was a pilot. He had shite tons of money - he likely would acquired whatever. If he chosen to go forward with his plan without such a device, the body count could have been a couple fewer, the same, or more.

Mateen killed 49 with a Sig MCX and a Glock 17 (Under $2000 for guns, accessories and ammo) - no bloody bump fire/slide fire/crank trigger nonsense at all. You think a millionaire can't at least match that?

We know where this ends - banning all semis (and heavily restricting everything else).

The fact that he was very wealthy is the most curious part of it for me.

quote:

---

Okay, YOU tell me why you NEED a suppressor.

---

it's none of your GOT DANG BIDNESS as to why i NEED a suppressor.

They won't come take shite from people. They would just not allow the manufacture or sale of them anymore