Started By
Message

5th place runner feels like silver medallist after 800m defeat to Caster Semenya

Posted on 8/23/16 at 9:43 am
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33910 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 9:43 am
quote:

A Polish middle distance runner who finished fifth in the women’s 800m final won by Caster Semenya at the Rio Olympics has claimed she “feels like a silver medallist”.

Joanna Jozwik also appeared to controversially claim that she was proud to have finished as the “first European” and the “second white” in the race.

The 25-year-old runner failed to earn a place on the podium, finishing behind South Africa’s Semenya, Burundi’s second-placed Francine Niyonsaba and Kenya’s bronze medallist Margaret Wambui.

Semenya is the best-known athlete to live with the condition but neither Niyonsaba or Wambui identify as hyperandrogenic.

Jozwik, nevertheless, has now echoed the sentiments of Great Britain’s Lynsey Sharpe and questioned the fairness of the contest including female athletes with high levels of testosterone.

“This season I had a lot of health complications and injuries, which is why I am very pleased with this result. I feel like the silver medallist,” Jozwik told Eurosport.

“The three athletes who were on the podium raise a lot of controversy. I must admit that for me it is a little strange that the authorities do nothing about this.

“These colleagues have a very high testosterone level, similar to a male’s, which is why they look how they look and run like they run.”

The Walbrzych-born sprinter finished with a time of 1:57.37, behind Canada’s Melissa Bishop.

“It hurts a bit. I saw Melissa Bishop who was very disappointed, she improved her personal best and was 4th. It's sad, and I think she should be the gold medalist."

"I'm glad I'm the first European, the second white," she added.


LINK


Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
17085 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 9:49 am to
I can't for the life of me find video of the actual race.

ETA: Found it.
This post was edited on 8/23/16 at 9:51 am
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
118790 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 10:10 am to
It's all about feelings.
Posted by Jamohn
Das Boot
Member since Mar 2009
13542 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 11:32 am to
quote:

It's all about feelings.

Aren't feelings the whole reason why they're letting dudes run in these events and smoke actual female competitors?
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22362 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 1:39 pm to
If these ladies just have a "genetic" advantage then this girl needs to just deal with it. They are just playing the hand the were dealt which very well maybe as much a curse as a blessing.

If these people switched teams or used a banned substance then she has something to gripe about.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 1:47 pm to
"Are they able to give birth?" Should be the test, IMO.
Posted by lowspark12
nashville, tn
Member since Aug 2009
22365 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 2:00 pm to
That's stupid
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

That's stupid


I disagree. For example, Semenya is, with medical assistance, capable of fathering children but not of birthing them. He is mostly male.

I certainly sympathize with anyone who is born with defects but it's unfair to put Semenya on the track with women who are subject to the limitations of their feminity while he has the distinct advantage of male physiology. That he was born with a vagina does not reduce the maleness of the rest of his physiology.
Posted by 23hella
STL
Member since Feb 2014
1234 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 3:03 pm to
So infertile women shouldn't be able to compete in the Olympics?
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

"Are they able to give birth?" Should be the test, IMO.


That's a really bad test because there are a lot of full females who are infertile, without that having anything at all to do with their testosterone level.

Testosterone in and of itself shouldn't be the criteria either. That's imprecise.

The test should be chromosomal. Only XX should be allowed to compete as women. XY (and XXY like Caster Semenya) should not be allowed to compete as women. Because they aren't. Someone with a Y chromosome has received male levels of testosterone since birth and has consequently developed male secondary characteristics, among which is much greater muscle mass, which makes it simply unfair for any such person to compete against women in athletic competitions.
This post was edited on 8/23/16 at 3:18 pm
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33264 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

I disagree. For example, Semenya is, with medical assistance, capable of fathering children but not of birthing them. He is mostly male.

I certainly sympathize with anyone who is born with defects but it's unfair to put Semenya on the track with women who are subject to the limitations of their feminity while he has the distinct advantage of male physiology. That he was born with a vagina does not reduce the maleness of the rest of his physiology.


Which bathroom would you support her being able to use without being triggered?
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33264 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

XXY like Caster Semenya


I haven't been able to confirm that. Do you have a source?

quote:

Someone with a Y chromosome has received male levels of testosterone since birth


I think the science says you are mistaken. She has not had "male levels" of testosterone.
Posted by JETigER
LSU 2011 National Champions
Member since Dec 2003
7081 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 3:27 pm to
I'm gonna make lemonade from the lemons that Caster has given me. I am using this to justify myself hitting from the women's golf tees.
Posted by denvertiger
Golden
Member since Feb 2007
3905 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 3:31 pm to
If anyone's interested in a lengthy discussion of the concepts and subtitles around the Semenya debate, Ross Tucker wrote a doozy that's worth a read. He's an ex phys out of S Africa.

LINK /
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33264 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

ex phys


What's an ex phys?
Posted by denvertiger
Golden
Member since Feb 2007
3905 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 5:13 pm to
Sorry...exercise physiologist
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35395 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 5:45 pm to
She was only allowed to compete because the IAAF suspended the Olympics "testosterone levels" last year.
quote:


Last year, the Court of Arbitration for Sport, the Swiss-based high court for international sport, suspended track and field’s testosterone policy for two years.


Female athletes above the testosterone threshold of 10 nanomoles per liter — considered at the lower end of the male range — faced the prospect of hormone-suppressing drugs and surgery to remove internal testes, which can produce testosterone.

It is not known for certain what, if any, procedures were undergone by Semenya, who won a silver medal at the 2012 London Olympics. Nor could it be verified, as reported in 2009 in The Daily Telegraph of Australia, that Semenya had internal testes and three times the testosterone level of a typical woman.

So her body is producing male level testosterone...which means everything in athletic performance...which is why young guys dominate in most sports and old guys have to retire (decreasing testosterone levels).

quote:

The court said it had been “unable to conclude that hyperandrogenic female athletes may benefit from such a significant performance advantage that it is necessary to exclude them from competing in the female category.”


Are they for real?
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

Are they for real?


Seriously. All three of these medalists are said to be hyperandrogenic. South Africa’s Semenya, Burundi’s second-place Francine Niyonsaba and Kenya’s bronze medallist Margaret Wambui have a distinct advantage over the women whose development in the womb was complete.


Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29276 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 6:18 pm to
That's 3 men.... Baaaabbbby.
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 8/23/16 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

I haven't been able to confirm that. Do you have a source?


Semenya's sex test explained. Gordon Farquhar of the BBC says that Semenya's chromosome test shows the 46,XY typical of a male.

quote:

Well, fairly, but how then do explain the example of a woman with secondary sexual development (breasts), anatomically female genitalia, yet with an XY chromosomic presentation? It does happen.

In simple(ish) terms, there's a condition called Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome, which occurs when a part of the Y chromosome doesn't do what it should.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram