Started By
Message

re: Would you go on a deep space trip in cryo sleep?

Posted on 2/16/17 at 1:05 pm to
Posted by Chiefagain
Member since Nov 2016
1808 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 1:05 pm to
Yup




Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28814 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

No you are not guaranteed to bang Jennifer Lawrence.



what if i tricked her into it though by waking her up early?
Posted by Itismemc
LA
Member since Nov 2008
4714 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 1:22 pm to
Just for a minute could you imagine how much this would frick up inheritances and the stock market.
Posted by DirtyMikeandtheBoys
Member since May 2011
19419 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 1:23 pm to
I'd do just about anything to get away from my wife and kids.
Posted by StopLightObservation
Charleston, South Carolina
Member since Feb 2017
287 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 1:26 pm to
If I had nothing to live for on earth, yes. If I had a family, no.
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17126 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 1:32 pm to
I absolutely would.

How devastating would it be to return to Earth and find it destroyed by war?
Posted by BiggerBear
Redbone Country
Member since Sep 2011
2917 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

And if the ship was traveling at 0.999999% the speed of light, 116,800 years would pass on earth in the 160 years you were traveling on the ship.


Nope. If the ship were only traveling 0.999999% the speed of light, there wouldn't be much difference between the amount of time traveling and the amount of time elapsed on earth. At that speed, traveling for only 80 years also wouldn't get you far enough away from earth to reach the closest star and so your 5 years "there" wouldn't be all that interesting unless there was a lot of stuff to do on the spaceship.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42557 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 2:09 pm to
Say the almost 200 year estimate is real. Could you imagine leaving this planet 200 years ago, when most of the world was living in straw huts, and landing today with skyscrapers, etc in advancements? There would be 2.5 generations of people between you and your loved ones. Not to mention if there would be an actual country capable of landing you. We could be reverted to mid evil times again.
Posted by Sparkplug#1
Member since May 2013
7352 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 2:11 pm to
I'd do it just to see if they ever fix the I 10 problem in BR. I'm sure I'd be disappointed when I got back, though.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71329 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 2:17 pm to
Nope. Personally, I think we are living in the last generation before AI, and I'd rather avoid that particular future.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
21855 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Spend 5 years exploring the new world and then return to Earth
quote:

No you are not guaranteed to bang Jennifer Lawrence.


Will there be any hot aliens to bang on this new planet?

Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
40766 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 2:18 pm to
with no family or kids, yes I wouldn't flinch.
Posted by Count Chocula
Tier 5 and proud
Member since Feb 2009
63908 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 2:20 pm to
What would Heather/YogaGirl/Tigerite do?
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

What would Heather/YogaGirl/Tigerite do?

Watch the rocket from Earth. She's not getting selected.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
31049 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

Nope. If the ship were only traveling 0.999999% the speed of light, there wouldn't be much difference between the amount of time traveling and the amount of time elapsed on earth. At that speed, traveling for only 80 years also wouldn't get you far enough away from earth to reach the closest star and so your 5 years "there" wouldn't be all that interesting unless there was a lot of stuff to do on the spaceship.


You even time dilation bro?

I wasn't stating an opinion, it's fact.

If you're traveling that close to the speed of light for 160 years, time on earth will have advanced 116,800 years between when you left and when you return.

Humans as a species likely wouldn't exist, or would look nothing like what they did when you left.

Not to mention, there are 53 stars within 17 light years of earth. Clearly you don't science, bro.

LINK
This post was edited on 2/16/17 at 5:28 pm
Posted by rbWarEagle
Member since Nov 2009
49999 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 5:15 pm to
You mean 99% the speed of light.
Posted by rbWarEagle
Member since Nov 2009
49999 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 5:16 pm to
And yes, I would. I'd rather die doing something no humans have ever done than live knowing I didn't take the opportunity.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
31049 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

You mean 99% the speed of light.


Good catch. That was a copy paste job, and may have been what the poster above me was talking about.

I owe Bigger Bear an apology.
This post was edited on 2/16/17 at 5:17 pm
Posted by mailman
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
6143 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 5:18 pm to
Hello no, theres nothing fun about space
Posted by BiggerBear
Redbone Country
Member since Sep 2011
2917 posts
Posted on 2/16/17 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

You even time dilation bro?

I wasn't stating an opinion, it's fact.


Do you even math bro?

0.999999% of the speed of light is close enough to 1% of the speed of light that the final calculation won't vary much. 1/100 of the speed of light isn't "close to the speed of light" and isn't going to result in much time dilation over the course of 165 years.

Next time, get your "facts"straight.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram