Started By
Message

re: Why was Princess Diana so revered at the time of her death?

Posted on 7/3/15 at 4:20 am to
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36104 posts
Posted on 7/3/15 at 4:20 am to
The first and most obvious answer is she was beautiful. Beautiful famous people are easy to project positive characteristics upon and feed into the fantasies of many of being more perfect themselves.

The behavior of Charles and Diana seems highly similar on the face of it but people loved her one hell of a lot more than him. He had the bad grace to be born ugly royal and fall for a more homely women instead of the woman his mother allowed him to marry. Both he and Diana had affairs "after their marriage was over". Both he and Diana have been generous with their time given to charity. The major difference is he is an ugly so and so and she was very beautiful.

It is funny - for reference I think of David Letterman and Johny Carson. Carson was a famous womanizer. He had multiple failed marriages and relationships with any number of beautiful celebrities. Letterman is still on his second marriage but had the balls to both be ugly and had an affair with a cute but unremarkable woman from his show.... and people forgave and loved Carson through it all while they villified Letterman (an ugly man) for having a single known affair. Because frankly, he's ugly, and he ought to be grateful than anyone would have him. Carson was not. He was charming, funny, handsome, and athletic. He deserved to do what he wanted because of this.

That's a major issue that Charles has faced. People feel like he was lucky to be married to a beautiful woman and don't know where that ugly man (who was bullied by his mother) had the balls to fall for a frumpy woman instead of Diana.
This post was edited on 7/3/15 at 4:24 am
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
118778 posts
Posted on 7/3/15 at 4:50 am to
quote:

She was no saint,
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
47332 posts
Posted on 7/3/15 at 5:12 am to
quote:

Yesterday would have been her 54th birthday and I began thinking. She was a lousy woman who banged Muslim guys and was knocked up twice by someone who wasn't her husband. That isn't exactly the best role model considering how conservative the Western world still was in the 90s.


Facts supporting your knocked up twice by other men allegation?

You have none. You must be a tabloid follower.

I think she was revered bc she was young when she became a royal, beautiful, shy and likely used by Charles to fulfill his royal expectations though he loved Camilla all along. She also crossed lines with her support for those with aids. She had to mature in the limelight and finally found part if her voice before her tragic death. She bucked the system a bit.
Posted by bawbarn
Member since Jul 2012
3688 posts
Posted on 7/3/15 at 6:36 am to
Mother Teresa died around the same time. Always thought her life should have been celebrated more than Diana's.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 7/3/15 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Mother Teresa died around the same time. Always thought her life should have been celebrated more than Diana's.

yep, best analogy I heard around that time, and I forget who said it, think it may have been the pope, was when people were wanting to canonize Di was, "if either should be considered it should be Mother Teresa, who has spent her live doing for others, Princess Diana is merely a concerned tourist"
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram