No one said depreciation isn't real you dumb twat. You threw a bunch of numbers around, which by your own example were wrong, then spouted off that we should all check with our accountants to learn something about depreciation.
First, of all, you're an idiot.
should all check with our
are the only one I am referring to since you are the only one who is trying
to argue that depreciation is invalid which you're having a hard time doing, so you've resorted to personal attacks, name calling, and misquoting & misinterpreting my statements the entire thread.
Third, can you not read? Your comprehension skills must suck because as I pointed out in my previous posts, the numbers I "threw around" are averages
or ranges with a high end & a low end
hence the terms, 'as much as'
or 'on the average'
or 'as little as'
. If you will actually read my statements, the percentages I quoted represent the range
in which vehicles will lose value (depreciate) over a 3 to 5 year period (another range). The percentages and values in the example I gave of the actual automobile and its actual depreciation over a 5 year period fall well within this range.
I also referenced the sites from which these numbers came in my last post which you incessantly demanded throughout this thread, and just as I predicted, you completely discounted them. For this reason, I suggested that you check with your own accountant and not rely on me or my sources even though they are based on basic accounting principles which have been widely recognized as accurate for an awfully long time, now.
Stop bringing up gender, because you're the only person that has brought your gender into this discussion. It's also not about disliking you, even if I do. You made a fairly outrageous claim, then didn't provide any sort of evidence to support it. when I and others called you out on it, all you could say was check with your accountant. It has nothing to do with you personally, but you won't believe that because you think everyone on this board is out to get you because you're a woman.
"Stop bringing up gender."
Really?... I will 'bring up' whatever is pertinent to the discussion. I believe the phrase "you dumb twat" says it all from your perspective.
"It's also not about disliking you, even if I do."
0 FRICKS ARE GIVEN BY ME.
However, it is blatantly obvious that your dislike for me is your sole motivation for your argument since factually, it is without merit. It is also very odd and a little alarming considering you do not know me at all. Weird stalker, maybe?
"It has nothing to do with you personally,..." BULL SHIT
It's fairly obvious that it does.
"You made a fairly outrageous claim, then didn't provide any sort of evidence to support it."
I stated are not outrageous at all. You keep misinterpreting and insinuating that I pulled them out of my arse which is a lie
. I gave my sources for the figures I stated in my previous almost two page post full of evidence to support my statements which you so conveniently seem to have overlooked. If you want more proof on the numbers besides what I've cited in bold type in my previous post, google "How much does my car depreciate in one year?" or "Is it better to purchase used or new cars?" I doubt you're interested, though, since discussing the real issue isn't your purpose for arguing.
"...you think everyone
on this board is out to get you
because you're a woman."
There is so much wrong with this statement, I hardly know where to begin.
First of all, FALSE
, and how presumptuous of you
to tell me
what or how I think.
Second, stop lumping everyone else in with yourself. You
are the only one taking this benign topic about vehicles and twisting it into something else by making it personal. Apparently, you have a completely different agenda than discussing used vs. new cars.
Last, I think people are out to get me?? This is a message board
. I barely think of the posters as people. I do, however, think you might be displacing your own paranoia.