Started By
Message

United sets off Twitter firestorm for forcing teens to change prior to boarding

Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:31 am
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20862 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:31 am
quote:

United Airlines suddenly found itself on the receiving end of mass social media outrage on Sunday morning when a Twitter user sounded the alarm that young girls wearing leggings were not allowed to board a domestic United flight. United Airlines took to Twitter to repeatedly defend the right of the gate agent to refuse boarding to anyone deemed no to be dressed appropriately. But then the company came out to clarify that the girls prevented from boarding were what are known as “pass riders,” or those who fly for free or sharply reduced rates because they’re employees or their relatives.

The company insisted regular paying customers are more than welcome to wear leggings on United flights, but there are special rules for pass riders. “Our regular passengers are not going to be denied boarding because they are wearing leggings or yoga pants,” a spokesman said. “But when flying as a pass traveler, we require this pass travelers to follow rules, and that is one of those rules.


But then it said...

quote:

Another girl was allowed to board once she put on a dress. “She’s forcing them to change or put dresses on over leggings or they can’t board,” Watts wrote on Twitter. “Since when does @united police women’s clothing?”

United’s immediate response? Since always. As outrage grew on social media, United Airlines took to its own Twitter account and repeatedly defended the gate agent’s actions. “United shall have the right to refuse passengers who are not properly clothed via our Contract of Carriage,” the company wrote on Twitter to people who asked about the policy. When pressed, the company directed people to Point 21 of its “contract of carriage” that notes passengers can be refused if they’re “barefoot or not properly clothed.”


Obviously the airline can set whatever ridiculous rules they want to, but hopefully their customers are smart enough to change to another airline that's not as uptight. That's pretty stupid.

LINK
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48886 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:31 am to
They could have changed airlines or actually bought a ticket on United
Posted by wickowick
Head of Island
Member since Dec 2006
45788 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:32 am to
quote:

but hopefully their customers are smart enough to change to another airline that's not as uptight


Are you a customer if you are riding for free?
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:32 am to
quote:

United Airlines suddenly found itself on the receiving end of mass social media outrage on Sunday morning when a Twitter user sounded the alarm that young girls wearing leggings were not allowed to board a domestic United flight. United Airlines took to Twitter to repeatedly defend the right of the gate agent to refuse boarding to anyone deemed no to be dressed appropriately. But then the company came out to clarify that the girls prevented from boarding were what are known as “pass riders,” or those who fly for free or sharply reduced rates because they’re employees or their relatives.

The company insisted regular paying customers are more than welcome to wear leggings on United flights, but there are special rules for pass riders. “Our regular passengers are not going to be denied boarding because they are wearing leggings or yoga pants,” a spokesman said. “But when flying as a pass traveler, we require this pass travelers to follow rules, and that is one of those rules.


Do not see an issue.
Posted by Panny Crickets
Fort Worth, TX
Member since Sep 2008
5596 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:33 am to
That's normal for non-rev passengers.

Let's all get outraged without knowing what we are talking about! Yeah!
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101914 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:33 am to
I used to get free passes from my Aunt who works for American Airlines all the time... there was definitely a more strict dress code to use the passes.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20862 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:33 am to
quote:

They could have changed airlines or actually bought a ticket on United


The rules they used to refuse them boarding apply to all passengers. They were using the pass thing as cover.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
140462 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:33 am to
Pics?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421189 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:33 am to
fake news

the people who were denied were employees and have a dress code when using the employee-flight program

these were not regular customers
Posted by TheArrogantCorndog
Highland Rd
Member since Sep 2009
14811 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:33 am to
WOWYHI
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
62824 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:33 am to
quote:

but hopefully their customers are smart enough to change to another airline that's not as uptight.


Is this a joke?
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39543 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:33 am to
Were they fat?


Leggings should come in a size limit.
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36568 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:34 am to
I despise these loweffort twitter outrage articles.
Posted by Armymann50
Playing with my
Member since Sep 2011
17028 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:34 am to
Should have made them put a burka on to show respect
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48886 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:34 am to
quote:

The rules they used to refuse them boarding apply to all passengers. They were using the pass thing as cover.


That's not what I read.

I read that they were on a "family and friends" deal with specific, more restrictive rules.
Posted by tiger rag 93
KCMO
Member since Oct 2007
2566 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:34 am to
My wife's grandparents were employees of Frontier airlines in Denver and we have flown on a "buddy pass", which essentially means we pay like $25 to fly. We were told we had to dress appropriately and not be too casual. So this isn't a United Airlines specific rule.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51441 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:35 am to
The free market at work
Posted by Box Geauxrilla
Member since Jun 2013
19116 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:35 am to
quote:

United shall have the right to refuse passengers who are not properly clothed via our Contract of Carriage


I totally agree with their right to refuse. But also, just because you can, doesn't mean you should.

Nobody would have given a shite or even knew they were not regular customers, and now they are receiving backlash.
Posted by BigB0882
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
5308 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:35 am to
quote:

fake news


It isn't fake. It actually happened. It is just complete bullshite that they decided to make it into news and that United is getting flack for enforcing their rules for those on guest passes. Most likely the family saw this as a way to cash in.
Posted by Winston Cup
Dallas Cowboys Fan
Member since May 2016
65489 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 10:35 am to
Everyone sucks and is offended by everything.

Downvote for no pics of yoga pants.

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram