Started By
Message

Question for you conspiracy folks.

Posted on 2/16/16 at 1:57 pm
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134817 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 1:57 pm
I was listening to a local public radio station (very liberal programming) and there were some guests on from the MOVE organization. One of their main beliefs was that big companies like Monsanto were trying to poison the general public with their GMO food products.

The question is why would companies poison the general public if their goal is global subjugation? What's the point of killing off those you wish to control, i.e. a puppet master with no puppet?
Posted by LSUfan20005
Member since Sep 2012
8806 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 2:02 pm to
I don't subscribe to their mindset, but they believe that this is a form of population control.

Along with chem trails, etc.
Posted by ShoeBang
Member since May 2012
19341 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

The question is why would companies poison the general public if their goal is global subjugation?


They don't want to kill people, they want to increase profit margins. That's what everyone who complains about corporations doesn't get. They are not inherently evil. They are inherently greedy. Big difference. They try to find the best ways to make more money each year vs the last year. Simple as that.

They aren't out to get anyone. If you think big business is out to get you, you have a narcissism issue. All they want is your money. They want you alive and spending.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 2:03 pm to
I love me some guberment cheese.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58078 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 2:04 pm to
Loons
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
150501 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

Along with chem trails, etc.



That's rehtaeh's batsignal, isn't it?
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134817 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

don't subscribe to their mindset, but they believe that this is a form of population control.


See, that's the point that I don't understand. If all these corporations want more money, why would they kill off potential consumers? I would think 1,000 people buying your product would be better than 100
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 2:06 pm to
quote:


The question is why would companies poison the general public if their goal is global subjugation? What's the point of killing off those you wish to control, i.e. a puppet master with no puppet?


you're probably confusing people who think monsanto is intentionally trying to poison people with people who think that GMO food products are poison.

but why not pick a better conspiracy? roswell, mk ultra, giving black people syphilis, creating AIDs, etc.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98077 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

They aren't out to get anyone. If you think big business is out to get you, you have a narcissism issue. All they want is your money. They want you alive and spending.


Well, to put a finer point on it, they want the optimum amount of revenue. That doesn't mean they want to kill everybody, but if the optimum amount of revenue means a certain number of people get sick, injured, or die, so be it, from their point of view. They are not immoral, but they are amoral. That distinction is lost on the person getting the shaft from them.

The counters to this are 1: law and 2: public opinion. The former for obvious reasons. The latter because if a company's reputation gets bad enough, it impacts the revenue stream.
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
38719 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 2:08 pm to
I think the actual conspiracy with Monsanto is that genetic modification (Which allows plants to be sprayed with stuff that would usually kill it) has resulted in bumper crops that gets more production with less land and thus more profit.

The conspiracy is that no one really knows what the long term affects may be on the general population after consumption. And it pays more to sweep those kind of notions under the rug.
This post was edited on 2/16/16 at 2:12 pm
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55437 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

mk ultra, giving black people syphilis


Neither one of these are conspiracies, at least in the way we use the term. They happened.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98077 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 2:10 pm to
Monsanto may also be implicated in the Zika outbreak LINK

quote:

The microcephaly outbreak in Brazil, which coincided with the spread of the Zika virus, continues to stun the world, even months after the incident was first reported.

Pregnant women all over the world have been advised to take caution. The Zika virus infection has been linked to newborn babies with the birth defect microcephaly. This is a congenital condition in which babies are born with unusually tiny heads.

The notion, however, has recently been challenged by a group of Argentine physicians. The group suspects that the Zika virus is not to blame for the rise in microcephaly cases, but that a toxic larvicide introduced into Brazil's water supplies may be the real culprit.

Not A Coincidence?

According to the Physicians in Crop-Sprayed Towns (PCST), a chemical larvicide that produces malformations in mosquitoes was injected into Brazil's water supplies in 2014 in order to stop the development of mosquito larvae in drinking water tanks.

The chemical, which is known as Pyriproxyfen, was used in a massive government-run program tasked to control the mosquito population in the country. Pyriproxyfen is a larvicide manufactured by Sumitomo Chemical, a company associated [PDF] with Monsanto. However, PCST has referred to Sumitomo as a subsidiary of Monsanto.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 2:17 pm to
quote:


Neither one of these are conspiracies, at least in the way we use the term. They happened.


they were conspiracies at one point.. and they're now confirmed
This post was edited on 2/16/16 at 2:18 pm
Posted by retired trucker
midwest
Member since Feb 2015
5093 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

They don't want to kill people, they want to increase profit margins. That's what everyone who complains about corporations doesn't get. They are not inherently evil. They are inherently greedy.


yup, their default is greed [ the love of money over everything else ]

evil gets minimized as excuse to legitimize any negative results of their actions that they may or may not admit to
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 2:24 pm to
Waiting for heather / yogagirl to school all y'all bitches.
Posted by BoostAddict
Member since Jun 2007
2986 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 3:04 pm to
There would be millions of starving people around the world without GMO's.
Posted by CherryGarciaMan
Sugar Magnolia
Member since Aug 2012
2497 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 3:17 pm to
Monsanto created agent orange.
Our gov't purchased it and dumped it on our soldiers and all along Vietnam.
Agent orange is poison, and there are a number of Vietnam vets that are having complications from that.

The above is indisputable fact.

Monsanto produces insecticide and pesticide, and those poisons seep into the water, which has a detriment to our health as well.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134817 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 3:30 pm to
And all that was done with malicious intent?

Keep in mind agent orange was used by the U.S. military, not by Monsanto.
Posted by CherryGarciaMan
Sugar Magnolia
Member since Aug 2012
2497 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 3:34 pm to
Intent? Maybe not.

Reckless and short-sighted (and greedy)? Indeed.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55437 posts
Posted on 2/16/16 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

Monsanto produces insecticide and pesticide, and those poisons seep into the water, which has a detriment to our health as well.



Let's not forget industrial fertilizers and the subsequent runoff.

I'm all for genetically modifying foods, but not in the manner that Monsanto has done. Relying on non-natural inputs can last only so long and it destroys soil quality.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram