- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Poll finds record support for pot legalization
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:05 am
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:05 am
LINK /
quote:
(CNN)More than 60% of Americans think marijuana use should be legalized, according to the latest CBS News poll.
The number -- 61% -- is the highest percentage ever recorded in this poll and a five-point increase from the previous year.
quote:
Most Americans -- 71% -- do not think the federal government should try to prohibit the sale and use of marijuana in the many states where the drug has been legalized in some form. And 88% favor medical marijuana use.
quote:
While 63% of Republicans oppose the federal government trying to stop marijuana use in these states, 76% of Democrats and 72% of independents oppose the federal government intervening.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:07 am to GreatLakesTiger24
It's really only a matter of time....it will happen with the generation of politicians and voters that are in their 30s right now.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:07 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
While 63% of Republicans oppose the federal government trying to stop marijuana use in these states
This is an area where Republicans seriously need to adapt, and quickly.
Picking stupid fights like this will lose them the younger generation.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:15 am to GreatLakesTiger24
It baffles me how folks who call themselves conservative and say they are for a smaller federal government still support spending billions to prop up the prohibition of marijuana and support the authority of the federal government over their state governments on an issue that has nothing to do with national security.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:17 am to GreatLakesTiger24
I don't understand the math here. How can a political stand for election and be against something that 60+% of people favor?
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:19 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
I don't understand the math here. How can a political stand for election and be against something that 60+% of people favor?
Because politicians don't stand for their constituency, no matter how many times they might say it. They stand for whoever makes their pockets the fattest. In this case, sheriff's lobbies, prison lobbies, alcohol lobbies, and big pharma make their pockets real fat.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:21 am to TheCaterpillar
Legalize it and you have my vote
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:21 am to GreatLakesTiger24
I don't smoke anymore, but did when I was in college. But IDGAF about this - if they want to do it and it's not hurting anyone, have at it. Same with "alternative" lifestyles. I don't give a shite what people do unless it adversely affects me. People that take a firm stance against this piss me off.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:21 am to NYNolaguy1
That stat doesn't say anything about the geographic distribution of the 61%.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:23 am to jdd48
That too. Losing support of law enforcement is huge for a politician trying to get elected.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:24 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
Most Americans -- 71% -- do not think the federal government should try to prohibit the sale and use of marijuana in the many states where the drug has been legalized in some form. And 88% favor medical marijuana use.
And yet the government doesn't listen.
Our government is fricking broken. frick lobbyists.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:27 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
don't understand the math here. How can a political stand for election and be against something that 60+% of people favor?
Ask your local Sherriffs department and pharmaceutical salesman
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:32 am to Breesus
quote:
Ask your local Sherriffs department and pharmaceutical salesman
Exactly. If you watched the 2016 legislative session during the hearings for Mills' bill that legalized an extremely limited form of medical marijuana, you saw it on full display. Newell Normand went before the legislature and cursed and yelled about it. And this was for a bill that included only an oil extract form of marijuana. The sheriff's association has alot of power and money. One documented example is Joe Lopinto's all expenses paid golf trip to Sandestin in 2015.
LINK
This post was edited on 5/5/17 at 10:33 am
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:39 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
I don't understand the math here. How can a political stand for election and be against something that 60+% of people favor?
Because people don't vote issue by issue. Every candidate in every election is going to be on the "wrong" side (in your view) on some issues, so you have no choice but to prioritize the issues for yourself and find the candidate that best matches your positions on the high priority issues.
So, if you favor pot legalization, the Republican opposes it and the Dem favors it, but you also want fewer entitlements, lower taxes, less regulation of business, more military spending, etc., you are likely to vote for the Republican even though he disagrees with you on the pot issue. Politicians suffer no political penalty for being on the opposite side of an issue from the majority of voters unless that issue is a high enough priority for enough voters that his "wrong" position actually starts costing him votes.
Pot legalization, like other issues that a majority support, such as same-sex marriage, legalized abortion, stricter gun control and a few others, is simply not a high enough priority for enough voters that opposing it will cost Republicans votes.
In addition, on several issues, including all of the ones listed above, the minority of voters who oppose them prioritize them much more highly than the majority who favor them. So, even if 60% favor legalized abortion and only 40% oppose it, the anti-abortion voters are much more likely to consider it an important enough issue to influence their vote than the pro-choice voters are. So, the candidate who goes along with the majority on that issue is actually more likely to lose votes than the candidate who opposes the majority.
It's one of the MANY failings of a two-party system. Voters are constantly given no choice but to vote for candidates with whom they disagree on a great many things, so politicians are free to disregard the will of the majority of their constituents to satisfy the demands of special interests as long as that one particular issue is not a dealbreaker for the voters whose will they are disregarding.
This post was edited on 5/5/17 at 10:46 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News