Started By
Message

re: Poll - If a person has a gun, when do you shoot them?

Posted on 7/19/16 at 3:57 pm to
Posted by Scooba
Member since Jun 2013
19999 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

It seems like cop should draw on person and demand they drop weapon


This is pretty straightforward. Anything less than following direct orders could lead to injury or death. Officer should absolutely have weapon drawn and ready.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 3:58 pm to
I've seen it.

Cops should be trained to do better than an "Activist", don't you think?
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139750 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 3:59 pm to
You are hopeless.

Hate on my man.
Posted by yoga girl
Member since Dec 2015
3673 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

By the time your brain processed what happened, a bullet would be on it's way to you already.


All I did was vote for my choice "E". I really didn't want to get into a debate.

Posted by Scooba
Member since Jun 2013
19999 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

All this is true. Those cops still killed that man WITHOUT sufficient provocation, IMHO.


The thing that most of you don't realize, I'm assuming you're talking about Sterling, is that because this man had a record, he was probably well known by officers that frequently patrolled that area. It doesn't take long for consistent offenders to have a poor reputation and had these cops known that he has caused issues with previous encounters they would have been on heightened alert. I see no reason they should wait for a felon to draw aim and squeeze a trigger before taking defensive action.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

Hate on my man.


Not hating. Asking for more discretion. Is that not allowed?

Seems like a lot of people feel it is a reasonable request.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134839 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 4:02 pm to
I've been thinking about this in light of the press release by the LSP's investigation of the BR shooting. They said witnesses noticed the shooter, with a rifle, looking into a police car and pointing his weapon a a potential cop inside. I've been thinking what would happen if I were a bystander and saw this and decided to engage the suspect prior to the action if I would be in some sort of trouble.
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
18893 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

All I did was vote for my choice "E". I really didn't want to get into a debate.


Kind of why I started the thread. Now that you have seen some reasoning as to why E is potentially a bad choice, would you change your mind?
Posted by Bleeding purple
Athens, Texas
Member since Sep 2007
25315 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 4:03 pm to
It depends on the totality of circumstances.


If my command is to "stop don't come any closer" and they are continuing to charge me the answer is A.

If my command is to stop and they are moving to an area that would conceal or prohibit my line of fire or an area with others that may be harmed then A.

If you are resisting physically at all (fighting, shoving, hitting, kicking) other than running away then the answer is B. because at any moment you may decide to use the firearm or simply overpower me and make it impossible for me to defend myself against the use of your firearm.

All other options C and above may result in officer death and deadly force is warranted.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139750 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 4:04 pm to
If you can't see the challenge of these encounters after watching that video then I don't know what to tell you. You keep saying discretion like it's not happening now. Discretion seems weird when speaking about a life and death situation.

Non-compliance with an armed officer while toting a gun or simulating toting a gun is suicide IMO.
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
7399 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 4:06 pm to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110582 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

When do you get to fire? As soon as he twitches?
Not as soon as he twitches.

But as soon as you feel that he is going for the gun.

Talking about it, it's really not that difficult to grasp. Now in the field in that moment, obviously that shite is tough.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

this man had a record, he was probably well known by officers that frequently patrolled that area. It doesn't take long for consistent offenders to have a poor reputation and had these cops known that he has caused issues with previous encounters


This is 100% pure speculation on your part.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110582 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

You know how I've gone 31 years without getting shot by police? I'm not a fricking moron when confronted by police officers. It's pretty easy not to get shot by police.
While I obviously agree with your overriding point, even that isn't 100%:

LINK
Posted by monkeybutt
Member since Oct 2015
4583 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 4:11 pm to
And this
quote:

WITHOUT sufficient provocation


is speculation on your part. Since no one knows what was really going on with his free right arm.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110582 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

This should not result in a reasonable person to fear for his life. These guys shot themselves in the leg/foot
In the case of Alton Sterling, the cop was standing...at his feet.

quote:

Two cops were wrestling one man. Each was restraining one arm while sitting on top of him. We have multiple videos of the incident. Nowhere have I seen where those police lives were in jeopardy.
So, you're 100% certain Sterling was NOT going for his gun?
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
113883 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

Is there a camera?



Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

AwesomeSauce


Thanks for taking the time. I CAN see his arm is free in frame #1. How in the hell could that be? I still do not understand that.

Anyway, given his active resistance, him being armed and him having that arm free, I would have to trust the officers in that situation if they said he was going for his gun. They obviously tried several non-lethal methods of restraint prior to resorting to lethal means.

I WOULD NOT CONVICT.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

So, you're 100% certain Sterling was NOT going for his gun?


I'm not 100% certain of anything. Are you?
quote:

In the case of Alton Sterling, the cop was standing...at his feet.


Both cops were laying on top of Alton trying there best to restrain him. I guess their best wasn't good enough.
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
7399 posts
Posted on 7/19/16 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

I WOULD NOT CONVICT.



first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram