- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Musk, Wozniak, and Hawking urge ban on weaponized AI
Posted on 7/28/15 at 4:07 pm to ManBearTiger
Posted on 7/28/15 at 4:07 pm to ManBearTiger
quote:
Great minds of our time banding together to bring solutions to real problems affecting the entire spectrum of humanity.
If you don't think AI is a potential "problem affecting the entire spectrum of humanity", you probably don't understand AI.
0
Posted on 7/28/15 at 4:14 pm to Delirium
quote:
This man, ladies and gentlemen, is allowed to vote.
Perhaps you could get Hawking to help you repair your sarcasm detector.
Posted on 7/28/15 at 4:18 pm to PsychTiger
Didn't seem like sarcasm, considering he followed up with:
quote:
Please show me where that says he has military experience, experience with weapons, etc. He has no experience in this arena. It's like me telling someone how to wire their house because I have an MBA
He was thrown in there because he's a big name
Posted on 7/28/15 at 4:26 pm to rbWarEagle
Ah, Okay. I read that a while ago it would seem. Maybe Hawking can help me with my memory.
Posted on 7/28/15 at 4:31 pm to PygmalionEffect
quote:
If you outlaw military weaponized artificial intelligence then only outlaws will have military weaponized artificial intelligence.
What's your opinion on chemical weapons?
Posted on 7/28/15 at 4:44 pm to Jim Rockford
AI---Allen Iverson is always causing trouble.
This post was edited on 7/28/15 at 4:47 pm
Posted on 7/28/15 at 4:47 pm to tidalmouse
Would love to do some psychedelics with Feynman or Hawking.
Posted on 7/28/15 at 4:49 pm to rbWarEagle
That would be an experience. 
Posted on 7/28/15 at 5:29 pm to Jim Rockford
A meaningless statement, and any "ban" would be futile. Someone, somewhere would not go along with it. Humans look for any advantage. It's just the way we are.
Posted on 7/28/15 at 5:34 pm to Breesus
quote:That's what happens when you lower the educational standards to be more "inclusive."
Number 40 something in education.
Posted on 7/28/15 at 5:59 pm to tigerpimpbot
quote:
quote:
This is the exact flashback scene in almost every AI gone wrong movie.
So..... will we learn from it?
Apparently if we listen to Thib, but not those computer geek dummies in the OP, then we should be good.
Last year he said he thinks that AI could replicate and improve itself faster than humans could evolve to keep up with it and eventually be superseded. He made a prediction based on what I have seen, nothing. No math behind it, no nothing. I didn't say the man wasn't a genius, but it's not really his area of expertise, as it is for Woz.
Posted on 7/28/15 at 6:00 pm to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
Last year he said he thinks that AI could replicate and improve itself faster than humans could evolve to keep up with it and eventually be superseded. He made a prediction based on what I have seen, nothing. No math behind it, no nothing. I didn't say the man wasn't a genius, but it's not really his area of expertise, as it is for Woz.
I like that you aren't getting off itPosted on 7/28/15 at 6:59 pm to rbWarEagle
I would listen to Hawkins for sure but to be fair this isn't exactly his field. His opinion is one to listen to but he is probably the least qualified to talk about that suubject of all the names listed.
Posted on 7/28/15 at 7:03 pm to OGtigerfan73
It isn't exactly Elon Musk's field, either, but I'd take his word for it.
Posted on 7/28/15 at 9:15 pm to rbWarEagle
Wouldn't it be a lot closer to musk's field?
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News