Started By
Message

I12 commuters, wasn't the S curve in the construction

Posted on 5/17/17 at 12:35 pm
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
36791 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 12:35 pm
zone the cause of multiple accidents when they were widening I12 btwn Millerville and DS?

Asking because they've created two or three similar little curves on I10 between Breaux Bridge and Laffy in preparation of adding a third lane. Just trying to guess the over/under on the amount of accidents this will cause and how bad the morning commute will be.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67589 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 12:37 pm to
yep...18 wheelers struggle on those s curves
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52147 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

I12 commuters, wasn't the S curve in the construction
zone the cause of multiple accidents when they were widening I12 btwn Millerville and DS?
Yes. Trucks were taking the curves too fast and overturning. Happened several times a week it seemed like.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57426 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

wasn't the S curve in the construction
zone the cause of multiple accidents
no, the cause is the shitty fricking drivers on the roads.
Posted by Boudreaux35
BR
Member since Sep 2007
21406 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 12:39 pm to
There were many factors that combined for the multiple accidents. The curves are designed for a specific vehicle speed. When those speeds are exceeded, especially with taller vehicles, accident rates will increase.

The curves were not the cause. The inability of drivers to maneuver thru them safely was.
Posted by lsuCJ5
Holly Springs, NC
Member since Nov 2012
959 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 12:42 pm to
(There were many factors that combined for the multiple accidents. The curves are designed for a specific vehicle speed. When those speeds are exceeded, especially with taller vehicles, accident rates will increase.

The curves were not the cause. The inability of drivers to maneuver thru them safely was.)

this times 1000. the detours are designed by an engineer. I did a project on US 90 and during the week the detour was fine. It never failed, I bet every impact to the barriers was from some drunk on a Friday and or Saturday night.
Posted by djangochained
Gardere
Member since Jul 2013
19054 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 12:50 pm to
I'll show you my S-Curve babe
Posted by DoctorTechnical
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2009
2791 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 12:50 pm to
OP, I thought the exact same thing when I passed those new curves yesterday. At least the Baton Rouge curves didn't look like they were put down by a tipsy amateur with a roll of duct tape, sheesh.
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
36791 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

no, the cause is the shitty fricking drivers on the roads


oh no doubt. I've been watching them on I10 the last 3 mornings without benefit of the concrete barriers and the drivers are still struggling. Can't wait till it gets narrowed down with no where to go. Should be a real demolition derby.
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43030 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 12:56 pm to
Isn't the role of a competent traffic engineer to anticipate traffic problems?

Why does it need to be a sharp S-curve? Why not a gradual merge? Oh yeah, that's because our "traffic engineers" aren't actually traffic engineers, and have no training in it
Posted by 50_Tiger
Dallas TX
Member since Jan 2016
39954 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 12:57 pm to
They are not NTTA quality baws.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57426 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Why does it need to be a sharp S-curve? Why not a gradual merge? Oh yeah, that's because our "traffic engineers" aren't actually traffic engineers, and have no training in it


Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Just trying to guess the over/under on the amount of accidents this will cause and how bad the morning commute will be.

Depends on whether or not your drivers are as shite as the ones in the LP. The truckers who drive tens of thousands of miles a year through all kinds of terrain aren't getting flustered by an s-curve.
This post was edited on 5/17/17 at 1:13 pm
Posted by RetLanaton
Member since May 2017
23 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 1:34 pm to
Imo, the problem with the I-12 S curves were that you had a curve with the road sloped the opposite of what you'd typical have in a curve. Imagine driving on a NASCAR track but the track is sloped from left to right instead of right to left in the curves. You also had to cross over the crown of the road, shifting the load. Trucks would haul arse through there and couldn't manage it.

Disclaimer: not an engineer but occasionally have sex with one
Posted by Boudreaux35
BR
Member since Sep 2007
21406 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Isn't the role of a competent traffic engineer to anticipate traffic problems?


Pretty damn hard to anticipate stupidity. Just like here. The safest way is a complete detour. Send your dumb arse driving down US90/I-49 thru Morgan City and N.O. to get to BR. That obviously won't work, so you lower the speed limit and divert traffic over using a lane shift or a crossover. The challenge is to decide how slow you need to get traffic and keep the diversion safe while still maintaining some decent flow of traffic. Nobody wants to slow down to 10mph while on the interstate and you obviously can't design a diversion or shift for 75mph that is safe in this kind of situation.


quote:

Oh yeah, that's because our "traffic engineers" aren't actually traffic engineers, and have no training in it


Please provide proof of this information.
Posted by WillieD
Lafayette/BR
Member since Apr 2014
2009 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 2:20 pm to
Typical for people to bitch about the existing roads and bitch more when steps are taken to improve them.
Posted by TigerGman
Center of the Universe
Member since Sep 2006
11173 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

I10 between Breaux Bridge and Laffy in preparation of adding a third lane.


Complete wast of money. I-10 East to Prairieville desperately needs this but we pissing money away on a stretch to Lafayette which will make ZERO difference.
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
36791 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

Typical for people to bitch about the existing roads and bitch more when steps are taken to improve them.



I haven't bitched about anything. I simply asked about a known problem area in an old construction zone for the sake of comparison to a new one.

Sorry you think every inquiry is some sort of complaint. Your life must really suck.
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
36791 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

Complete wast of money. I-10 East to Prairieville desperately needs this but we pissing money away on a stretch to Lafayette which will make ZERO difference.


not sure if serious, but this stretch between Laffy and the Spillway needs an upgrade. Not saying its more deserving than I10-Pville. But it certainly doesn't rate a 0.
Posted by link
Member since Feb 2009
19867 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Complete wast of money. I-10 East to Prairieville desperately needs this but we pissing money away on a stretch to Lafayette which will make ZERO difference.

everything you posted is incorrect. proposals for I-10 east from highland to 73 have been submitted. it's been in the works for awhile. the portion in breaux bridge is from a different pool of use-it-or-lose-it money and not a waste at all.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram