Started By
Message

re: Having Gun Discussion On Facebook W/ A Friend

Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:32 pm to
Posted by USAF Hart
My House
Member since Jun 2011
10273 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:32 pm to
I think everyone is misinterpreting my posts. I am all for the 2nd amendment. I have a gun, and i'll be damned if someone thinks they can pass a law that forces me to relinquish my weapon that I use to protect myself and my family. HOWEVER, there needs to be stricter laws set in place that make it harder for people to obtain weapons and ammo. Yes, I know Wal-Mart and Bass Pro have background checks, but a Wal-Mart background check and a Police background check are two totally different things.

There will never be a way to stop criminals from obtaining guns illegaly unless we completely wipe out all gangs and drug cartels. Sure we could make stricter border laws but there isn't a political figure out there that is willing to declare an all out stoppage on allowing people in to America which is unfortunate. That's the major thing that separates us from the rest of the world. Take for instance the UK. In order to have a job in the UK, you must either be a citizen or have a working visa (passport). Something as simple as that could help America, but we are too worried about hurt feelings than fixing the glaring issues.
Posted by Ice Cream Sammich
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
10110 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:32 pm to
I am 100% fine with any precautions you want to implement against firearms, if we do the same for voting.

ID, background checks, hold periods, retinal scanners, rectum scanners, etc.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
123767 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

Build precincts at every police station that are manned 24/7 that can sell weapons and ammo to citizens who have the proper documentation and background check approval. Run thumb prints, retina scans, the whole nine yards.



The "whole 9 yards" being the inevitable abuse of power?

Do you WANT A police state?
Posted by PawnMaster
Down Yonder
Member since Nov 2014
1649 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:33 pm to
The current background system works fine. The problem is criminals either obtain firearms from individuals or get their GF/friend/family member to go into the store and buy it for them. Bottom line is criminals don't abide by the law, that's why they are criminals.

Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166015 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

I think everyone is misinterpreting my posts. I am all for the 2nd amendment. I have a gun, and i'll be damned if someone thinks they can pass a law that forces me to relinquish my weapon that I use to protect myself and my family. HOWEVER, there needs to be stricter laws set in place that make it harder for people to obtain weapons and ammo. Yes, I know Wal-Mart and Bass Pro have background checks, but a Wal-Mart background check and a Police background check are two totally different things.

There will never be a way to stop criminals from obtaining guns illegaly unless we completely wipe out all gangs and drug cartels. Sure we could make stricter border laws but there isn't a political figure out there that is willing to declare an all out stoppage on allowing people in to America which is unfortunate. That's the major thing that separates us from the rest of the world. Take for instance the UK. In order to have a job in the UK, you must either be a citizen or have a working visa (passport). Something as simple as that could help America, but we are too worried about hurt feelings than fixing the glaring issues.


are you fricking high right now?
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:34 pm to
Tell your friend his numbers are shite. Total horseshite.

You think Mexico, Central American countries and many African countries have a lower per capita murder rate than the U.S.?

Did you just accept his bullshite chart?
This post was edited on 8/27/15 at 3:35 pm
Posted by USAF Hart
My House
Member since Jun 2011
10273 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Chad504boy


Are you capable of having a rational discussion without name calling and over using profanity for no reason what so ever?
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:38 pm to
Posted by LesMiles BFF
Lafayette
Member since May 2014
5101 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

by USAF Hart


I'm sorry but you won't get any serious discussion on here about possible steps to curb gun violence.

Anything you suggest that would possibly make it harder for a criminal to get a gun will be met with such mental gymnastics as "criminals don't buy guns like normal people. Since they don't buy guns at stores like normal people then there is no reason to tighten the requirements to get a gun. Since we can't tighten requirements then there is nothing that can be done."

"So basically, we should do nothing".

That's the type of conversation that goes on around here.
This post was edited on 8/27/15 at 3:39 pm
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166015 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:38 pm to
quote:



Are you capable of having a rational discussion without name calling and over using profanity for no reason what so ever?




you haven't said anything worth an intellectual discussion thus far. Your thoughts in this thread is beyond simple minded stupidity arguing against invalid facts and everything you type is littered with down votes.
Posted by zelman
Bogan Walk
Member since Feb 2015
2400 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:40 pm to
Just say this, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed," and proceed to drop the mic.
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
19104 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:40 pm to
Looking at the oft maligned wikipedia at Murder Rates by country in the most recently reported year.

The United States is 111th on the list with 4.7 murders per 100,000 residents. Countries higher than the US include:

North Korea - 5.2 (and they control everything)
British Virgin Islands - 8.4
Russia - 9.2
Cayman Islands (UK) - 14.2
Mexico - 21.5
Brazil - 25.2
South Africa - 31.0
Jamaica - 39.3

The most dangerous country on the list...Houduras 90.4

Yes...China, UK, Czech Republic, and France are all 1.0.
Ireland is 1.2 and Italy is actually 0.9.

LINK

Tell him that Donald Trump said to get rid of the Mexicans and put up a wall, and our murder rate would be the same as our European counterparts...(of course, Trump hasn't said this, but it would make his liberal head explode to turn the discussion from gun control to illegal immigration).
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:40 pm to
quote:



I'm sorry but you won't get any serious discussion on here about possible steps to curb him violence.



The numbers in his OP are ludicrous. Laughably ludicrous.
Posted by LesMiles BFF
Lafayette
Member since May 2014
5101 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

I think everyone is misinterpreting my posts. I am all for the 2nd amendment. I have a gun, and i'll be damned if someone thinks they can pass a law that forces me to relinquish my weapon that I use to protect myself and my family. HOWEVER, there needs to be stricter laws set in place that make it harder for people to obtain weapons and ammo.


What you need to understand is that people on here cannot reconcile the two thoughts.

To them, making it tougher to get guns means you are against the 2nd amendment and therefore anti-American.

There are some really stupid and stubborn people around here.
Posted by TaderSalad
mudbug territory
Member since Jul 2014
24598 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

He posted a chart that said America has 3.7 murders per 100,000 residents. The next closest is Italy at 0.68. So it raised the question how can we control who and how people obtain guns and I think I found the best solution...



Nigeria, Kenya, Zimbabwe, Sudan, Chad, Libya, Syria, Iraq... aww hell... most of the world has higher death by firearm rates than we do. Oh, btw, the day that we had the sandyhook shooting, some loonie in China brought a sword to school and killed like 30 kids... so now we should ban cutlery?

You know what else is illegel? marijuana... Guns arent the problem. Man's intent to do ill will is the problem.
Posted by CoachKlein
Ratchet City
Member since Mar 2015
1492 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:42 pm to
I see all the down votes but I actually agree with you to an extent
Posted by htownjeep
Republic of Texas
Member since Jun 2005
7611 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

USAF Hart
I just did the google search I said I would and your friend's assertions are just laughable. We are not even close to the top and neither were the ones I listed (even though they were more than the US).

I saw a list that matched your friend's somewhat and it had all kinds of parameters that were just horseshite. Income level, type of nation (development level), etc...

Your friend is a hack.
Posted by LesMiles BFF
Lafayette
Member since May 2014
5101 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

The numbers in his OP are ludicrous. Laughably ludicrous.


The number really isn't what the discussion is about now is it. The main discussion is how to lower illegal gun violence.

Why throw the baby out with the bath water? A civil discussion can be had here without knowing the exact number.
This post was edited on 8/27/15 at 3:46 pm
Posted by BRUNNIN4
DFW
Member since Mar 2010
3060 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

a Wal-Mart background check and a Police background check are two totally different things.

The NICS is run by the FBI, what are local police going to find that the FBI isn't already finding?
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 8/27/15 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

think you don't understand how to read data. Clearly broken down per 100,000 to accurately compare differing populations.


You think a random sample of 100,000 Italians and a random sample of 100,000 Americans is anywhere near possible to compare?

His original comparison of Italy and America is retarded. He's better off comparing a single state in the Union to a single country in Europe and even that is a tentatively better comparison at best.

So I went with a frick you this is America comment. Which is better than explaining how stupid his comparison is.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram