- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Halle Berry Ordered to Pay 16k/month in Child Support
Posted on 6/10/14 at 8:57 am
Posted on 6/10/14 at 8:57 am
plus 115k in backpay and 300k in legal fees
Remember this the next time you bitch about family law being slanted in favor of the woman...
LINK
Remember this the next time you bitch about family law being slanted in favor of the woman...
LINK
32
Posted on 6/10/14 at 8:58 am to boosiebadazz
Good! I love when I hear a woman having to pay large chunks of change for once
Posted on 6/10/14 at 8:58 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Remember this the next time you bitch about family law being slanted in favor of the woman...
Well it is slanted toward women.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 8:59 am to SG_Geaux
No, it's not. Custody is slanted in what is in the best interest of the child, and support is based on the standard of living and the relative income of the parties
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:00 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
No, it's not. Custody is slanted in what is in the best interest of the child, and support is based on the standard of living and the relative income of the parties
Ha.
Kudos on finding a sample set of one to support this silliness.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:00 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
No, it's not.
Yes, it is.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:00 am to boosiebadazz
she can afford it.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:01 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
No, it's not. Custody is slanted in what is in the best interest of the child, and support is based on the standard of living and the relative income of the parties
Yes it is. If I'm not mistaken custody reverts automatically to the wife and then the husband has to present a case to get custody.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:01 am to boosiebadazz
So he came in halle berry back when she was stupid hot and gets a 200k pension for it
That my friends is fricking winning
That my friends is fricking winning
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:01 am to boosiebadazz
That is what you call a WIN. You get to spray Halle Berry's guts then get paid
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:02 am to Breesus
It's almost a chicken or the egg type deal.
Is it slanted towards women because that's what the law says or is it slanted towards women because the standards are what i set out above and in the large majority of cases it's better to elave a child with its stable mother and women, on average, make less money than their breadwinner husbands?
Causation vs. correlation
Is it slanted towards women because that's what the law says or is it slanted towards women because the standards are what i set out above and in the large majority of cases it's better to elave a child with its stable mother and women, on average, make less money than their breadwinner husbands?
Causation vs. correlation
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:02 am to reb13
You are quite mistaken.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:02 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
boosiebadazz
Dude. You cited ONE example of a woman that is RICH.
She is worth like 70 million. $16k/month is NOTHING
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:03 am to boosiebadazz
This would never happen in Louisiana.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:03 am to Motorboat
Who the hell uses one instance to make a blanket statement? Hey, a plane crashed once. Planes aren't safe.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:03 am to SG_Geaux
Go marry a doctor and play housedad for a few years and see how your divorce turns out for you.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:04 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
No, it's not. Custody is slanted in what is in the best interest of the child
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:08 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Remember this the next time you bitch about family law being slanted in favor of the woman...
Youve obviously never been through a divorce.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:10 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Causation vs. correlation
I don't disagree with this in general...
But there are also things like this LINK
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:10 am to boosiebadazz
Go through a divorce with a kid involved in Louisiana and come get back with me about which way the laws are slanted
Page 1 of 8
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News