Started By
Message

Forbes lowers net worth of Theranos head Elizabeth Holmes from $4.5 billion to 0

Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:37 pm
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51209 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:37 pm


LINK

quote:

Last year, Elizabeth Holmes topped the FORBES list of America’s Richest Self-Made Women with a net worth of $4.5 billion. Today, FORBES is lowering our estimate of her net worth to nothing. Theranos had no comment.

Our estimate of Holmes’ wealth is based entirely on her 50% stake in Theranos, the blood-testing company she founded in 2003 with plans of revolutionizing the diagnostic test market. Theranos shares are not traded on any stock market; private investors purchased stakes in 2014 at a price that implied a $9 billion valuation for the company.

Since then, Theranos has been hit with allegations that its tests are inaccurate and is being investigated by an alphabet soup of federal agencies. That, plus new information indicating Theranos’ annual revenues are less than $100 million, has led FORBES to come up with a new, lower estimate of Theranos’ value.

FORBES spoke to a dozen venture capitalists, analysts and industry experts and concluded that a more realistic value for Theranos is $800 million, rather than $9 billion. That gives the company credit for its intellectual property and the $724 million that it has raised, according to VC Experts, a venture capital research firm. It also represents a generous multiple of the company’s sales, which FORBES learned about from a person familiar with Theranos’ finances.


quote:

At such a low valuation, Holmes’ stake is essentially worth nothing. Theranos investors own preferred shares, which means they get paid back before Holmes, who owns common stock. According to VC Experts, investors in Theranos own a particular kind of preferred equity, called participating preferred shares, which take precedence to common stock in the event of a liquidation. FORBES is not aware of any plans to liquidate. If that were to happen, participating preferred investors would get their money back and more before Holmes gets a cent.


Such a shady company.
This post was edited on 6/1/16 at 12:42 pm
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141386 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:38 pm to
IWSHI
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
58299 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:39 pm to
Posted by UncleRuckus
Member since Feb 2013
7622 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:40 pm to
IWHI. Would try to impregnate if she's still wealthy
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51209 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

IWSHI


You sure about that?

She seemed kinda weird and crazy when this company was the hot topic. Now she is weird, crazy, and Forbes-certified worthless.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66870 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

more realistic value for Theranos is $800 million


OT poor
Posted by whodatfan
Member since Mar 2008
21320 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:41 pm to
Just look at that Hillarist.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
35457 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:41 pm to
She's still worth more than me but I'll relish in the shadenfreude.
Posted by DaTroof
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2015
973 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:41 pm to
This needs to happen to Mark Zuckerberg and stupid arse facebook
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141386 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

You sure about that?
Are you deaf?

I said IWHI, not IWMI
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51209 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Are you deaf?


Maybe, but that wouldn't matter on a message board
Posted by makinskrilla
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jun 2009
9727 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:42 pm to
I blame racial wealth inequality
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84582 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Today, FORBES is lowering our estimate of her net worth to nothing. Theranos had no comment.


, what would you expect them to say?

quote:

private investors purchased stakes in 2014 at a price that implied a $9 billion valuation for the company.


Yeah that is going to be sting.
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
22028 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

a more realistic value for Theranos is $800 million

HA, what a loser.
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

FORBES is lowering our estimate of her net worth to nothing.


Still more wealthy than me. Im in debt
Posted by Tingle
1173 Tallow Tree Lane
Member since Sep 2013
4558 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:43 pm to
Craziest crazy eyes I've ever seen.
This post was edited on 6/1/16 at 12:53 pm
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141386 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

She's still worth more than me but I'll relish in the schadenfreude
IWHI until I gave her the schadenfreudean slip
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84582 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

This needs to happen to Mark Zuckerberg and stupid arse facebook


Considering your rant on the charade that is the diamond market it was a given that you hate Facebook too.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84582 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:45 pm to
quote:



HA, what a loser


I don't think that is a net worth of the company or else they wouldn't lower her net worth to $0.
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76111 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

quote:
IWSHI


You sure about that?



We've all fricked way worse. Let's not pretend otherwise.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram