- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Family invites sheriff to inspect their med. weed dispensary; instead they raid
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:06 am
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:06 am
LINK
Where do you even begin with this story?
quote:
Annette Shattuck and her husband, Dale, had been facing felony charges of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, possession with intent to manufacture marijuana and maintaining a drug house. But last month, Michigan Circuit Court Judge Daniel Kelly threw out all criminal complaints filed against the Shattucks “on the grounds of entrapment by estoppel,” according to court filings. Entrapment by estoppel occurs when a government official leads a defendant to believe that their conduct is permissible under the law
quote:
In 2014, the Shattucks were starting up a marijuana dispensary under Michigan’s medical marijuana law. They worked to ensure every last detail was in full compliance with the law as they understood it: They obtained the permission of the landlord of the building where the dispensary, called the DNA Wellness Center, was to be housed. They went to local planning commission meetings to obtain the proper permits and licenses. They discussed business hours, security measures and even signage requirements with the planning commission.
The town building inspector checked the property and approved the signage. The chairman of the planning commission publicly thanked the Shattucks for working within the allowed legal framework. According to court documents, the Shattucks even went so far as to call the local sheriff’s Drug Task Force to invite them to inspect the property and verify their compliance with the law.
quote:
But the Task Force never inspected the property. Instead, acting on an anonymous tip that marijuana was being sold at the location, agents of the St. Clair County Drug Task Force conducted a number of “controlled buys,” where informants with medical marijuana cards entered the dispensary and purchased marijuana under the guise of medical use. That gave them enough probable cause to execute a raid.
quote:
Technically, Shattuck’s dispensary should not have been approved by the town planning commission, because the law does not provide for selling marijuana in dispensaries, Guilliat said. “I think the township probably thought they were doing the right thing, without knowing what the law says,” he added.
On July 28, 2014 – not long after the couple reached out to them to perform a compliance check – task force agents raided both the dispensary and the Shattucks’ home. In addition to charging the Shattucks with a variety of marijuana-related drug crimes, they took a lawnmower, a bicycle, their daughter’s birthday money, their marriage certificate and numerous other belongings, according to Annette Shattuck’s testimony before the Michigan House last year.
quote:
Under asset forfeiture laws, police are allowed to seize and keep property suspected of involvement in a crime, regardless of whether the property’s owners are ever convicted – or even charged, in many cases. Michigan’s laws are particularly skewed against property owners, according a 2015 report from the Institute for Justice. The nonprofit civil liberties law firm gave Michigan a D- on its forfeiture laws, citing “poor protections for innocent property owners” and policies that allow police to keep up to 100 percent of the proceeds from forfeited property, creating a profit motive for seizing belongings.
quote:
Annette Shattuck says that since the charges have been dismissed, the Drug Task Force has returned some of her property. But much of it is damaged. Electronic items are missing power cords and remotes. Her and her husband’s phones were smashed. They returned her husband’s guns and the safe he stored him in, but they didn’t return the key. Two of the kids’ insurance cards are missing. Shattuck says her marriage and birth certificates haven’t been returned, and since the Task Force does not itemize seized documents in its paperwork, it has no record of taking them in the first place.
quote:
The pending charges had made it difficult for the Shattucks to find work. Annette’s husband Dale had worked in construction before starting up the dispensary. But since the police seized all his tools, he had difficulty returning to his old line of work. They turned to borrowing money from friends and family. “We owe a lot of people a lot of money,” Shattuck said. “We depended on the kindness of relatives. If we didn’t have them, we wouldn’t have been able to do anything.”
Even though all charges against her have been dropped, “I’m still not innocent in the perception of the community,” she said. She recently tried to volunteer at an event at her children’s school. But school officials told her that simply being charged with a drug felony was enough to bar her from volunteering there.
Guilliat, the assistant prosecutor for St. Clair County, says that knowing what they do now about the case, his office “would have never gotten involved.” He added: “Since this case, there have been substantial changes due to the case interpretations of this very confusing statute. We now know more than we did back then – if it’s a close call, we don’t do it.” Meaning, he said, that “we don’t want to put people who think they’re doing the right thing – even if they’re not – through the system.”
Where do you even begin with this story?
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:08 am to GetCocky11
I began by not reading
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:09 am to Fonzarelli
quote:
I began by not reading
Then why even reply?
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:11 am to GetCocky11
Not all cops are bad. You should trust them because the odds of this happening to you are too low to justify painting all police with a broad brush of distrust.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:12 am to GetCocky11
You begin with accountability with the police department. Accountability and consequences for overreach and attempted destruction of a family.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:15 am to GetCocky11
Civil Law Suit it where I began. Against all the cops in the raid, the idiot who okayed it, the entire PD, and the township.
Hell anyone who ever said I was good to go with my shop would get a summons.
Someone's gotta pay for essentially ending my life as I know it.
Won't be too hard to convince a jury of it I presume.
Hell anyone who ever said I was good to go with my shop would get a summons.
Someone's gotta pay for essentially ending my life as I know it.
Won't be too hard to convince a jury of it I presume.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:15 am to GetCocky11
Seriously, what's the deal with some of these cops/police departments?
The family obviously was trying to do things by the book, there was no criminal intent, why couldn't the cops show up and say, "hey, you're in violation of the law and you need to stop/shut down immediately. If you don't then we will come arrest you."
Why can't that happen anymore? These people were not a threat to anyone and had the actual blessing of the township.
ETA: Ruining these peoples lives for no reason.
The family obviously was trying to do things by the book, there was no criminal intent, why couldn't the cops show up and say, "hey, you're in violation of the law and you need to stop/shut down immediately. If you don't then we will come arrest you."
Why can't that happen anymore? These people were not a threat to anyone and had the actual blessing of the township.
ETA: Ruining these peoples lives for no reason.
This post was edited on 3/31/16 at 8:17 am
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:16 am to GetCocky11
weve been royally fricked by big government on the marijuana/hemp issue
land of free, home of the brave....
land of free, home of the brave....
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:17 am to Fonzarelli
You should.
It is reason # 3,990,276 that forfeiture laws are bullshite.
Marijuana will be legal nationwide soon enough because if there's one thing that governments love more than controlling people's choices, it is tax revenue.
The simpering and whining from law enforcement will finally be drowned out but the promise of tax dollars.
It is reason # 3,990,276 that forfeiture laws are bullshite.
Marijuana will be legal nationwide soon enough because if there's one thing that governments love more than controlling people's choices, it is tax revenue.
The simpering and whining from law enforcement will finally be drowned out but the promise of tax dollars.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:19 am to burdman
quote:
Why can't that happen anymore?
Who's to say it doesn't? Maybe that just doesn't make for a good story, so it goes unreported.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:19 am to GetCocky11
quote:
Guilliat, the assistant prosecutor for St. Clair County, says that knowing what they do now about the case, his office “would have never gotten involved.” He added: “Since this case, there have been substantial changes due to the case interpretations of this very confusing statute. We now know more than we did back then – if it’s a close call, we don’t do it.” Meaning, he said, that “we don’t want to put people who think they’re doing the right thing – even if they’re not – through the system.”
'Basically the Shattucks were a test run.'
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:22 am to Fonzarelli
quote:
I began by not reading
They have centers for this condition.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:24 am to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
quote:
What? The land of the free?
Whoever told you that is your enemy
- Rage Against the Machine
Wise words in hindsight.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:25 am to GetCocky11
quote:
I began by not reading
Then why even reply?
Because this is the OT where smartass dorks think it's cool and edgy to be an a-hole.
As for the subject at hand, what this couple has been put through is beyond fricked up. Everyone responsible for putting them in this situation should be held accountable. Along with that, this couple should sue the ever loving shite out of everyone of them.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:25 am to ThatMakesSense
quote:
We now know more than we did back then – if it’s a close call, we don’t do it.” Meaning, he said, that “we don’t want to put people who think they’re doing the right thing – even if they’re not – through the system.”
Is he implying that this wasn't a close call, and that he thought these people knew they were committing a crime?
quote:
Even though all charges against her have been dropped, “I’m still not innocent in the perception of the community,” she said. She recently tried to volunteer at an event at her children’s school. But school officials told her that simply being charged with a drug felony was enough to bar her from volunteering there.
Some Tier 1 bullshite right there. Guilty even after proving yourself innocent, and after LEO trying lock you up frivolously.
This post was edited on 3/31/16 at 8:33 am
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:33 am to NYNolaguy1
Basically have to move somewhere else to probably even have a chance at returning to normal life.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:35 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Who's to say it doesn't?
quote:
Family invites sheriff to inspect their med. weed dispensary; instead they raid
Didn't happen here.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:45 am to GetCocky11
Didn't read all of it but it seems they consulted everybody but an attorney.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:48 am to GetCocky11
The more I read this the more I and
Someone was clearly thinking of the children here. A whole generation of kids knowing who they serve and who they need protection from.
quote:
When the task force raided her home, Shattuck’s mother was babysitting her four children, who were all under age 10 at the time. “During the dynamic entry, armed DTF officers wearing ski masks separated the children from their grandmother at gunpoint, shouting at her to get the dog under control or they would shoot it,” a court briefing filed by the Shattucks’ lawyer alleges. “The deputies kept the children lined up on the couch at gunpoint, refusing even to remove their masks to help calm the kids.”
quote:
Now, “if my kids are outside in my yard, they run into my house if they see a police officer,” Shattuck said. “They’re petrified.” Her 10-year-old daughter has been in counseling for a year and a half.
Someone was clearly thinking of the children here. A whole generation of kids knowing who they serve and who they need protection from.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:53 am to 50_Tiger
quote:
Civil Law Suit it where I began.
And then you would run head-long into the doctrine known as qualified immunity. It takes the most egregious case for a plaintiff to overcome that defense, and this isn't even remotely close to one of them.
If only the average lay person knew how much the deck was stacked against them, they'd be pissed. It basically takes a cop shooting you out of anger to hold them liable for anything.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News