Started By
Message

False advertising lawsuit

Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:11 pm
Posted by Maverick01
Member since Sep 2015
581 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:11 pm
I bought a stick of "unscented" Arm & Hammer deodorant that was actually scented. I was shocked when I used it this morning and discovered that it had a scent. In addition, by mid-day, my underarms had a mothball odor. I had to go home on my lunch break, take a shower, and change my shirt. This cost me money, time, gas, a loss in productivity, and I suffered emotional damage. This is deceptive marketing. Do I have grounds to file a lawsuit? Any lawyers on here think I have a case?
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:12 pm to
You have a great case. A very solid chance to spend $5000 to win $75.
Posted by Team Alpha Beast
Member since Mar 2016
743 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

I bought a stick of "unscented" Arm & Hammer deodorant that was actually scented.




Unscented does not mean odorless.

Posted by lsuwontonwrap
Member since Aug 2012
34147 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:15 pm to
TMI, baw
Posted by Maverick01
Member since Sep 2015
581 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

Unscented does not mean odorless


The very definition of unscented is having no scent. Something that has an odor has a scent. English isn't your first language obviously.
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18664 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:17 pm to
If you are not satisfied with the product, then contact the manufacturer about a refund.
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18664 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

The very definition of unscented is having no scent. Something that has an odor has a scent. English isn't your first language obviously.


Unscented means that they don't add fragrance.
Posted by Maverick01
Member since Sep 2015
581 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:21 pm to
They should have a disclaimer then explaining that. Last time I checked the definition of unscented isnt ambiguous. This is bullshite advertising.
Posted by Boxcar
Richmond VA
Member since Mar 2016
900 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:23 pm to
Choot that fuqer
Posted by xxGEAUXxx
minneapolis
Member since Dec 2012
1055 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:24 pm to
You're really upset over a little thing.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58089 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:24 pm to
Dumbass
Posted by Team Alpha Beast
Member since Mar 2016
743 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

The very definition of unscented is having no scent


Unless it is used as a verb in which it can mean to fill with an odor.

Un-scented would mean not filled with an odor.



Posted by Maverick01
Member since Sep 2015
581 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

You're really upset over a little thing


It's the principle of it all. I purchased it on the assumption that what I was getting is what was advertised. Put yourself in my shoes. For example, say you ordered a shrimp poboy, and what you got was pastrami on rye, would you not be upset?
Posted by Team Alpha Beast
Member since Mar 2016
743 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

It's the principle of it all. I purchased it on the assumption that what I was getting is what was advertised. Put yourself in my shoes. For example, say you ordered a shrimp poboy, and what you got was pastrami on rye, would you not be upset?


But you got exactly what you purchased.

Deodorant that did not have fragrance or "scent" added to it. It is intended for people allergic to frangrances.
Posted by PepaSpray
Adamantium Membership
Member since Aug 2012
11080 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

They should have a disclaimer then explaining that. Last time I checked the definition of unscented isnt ambiguous. This is bullshite advertising.

frick off, mcdonalds bitch.

There are ingredients, and they're usually listed. It's not false advertising and you'll lose. Handout McGee
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98125 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:37 pm to
Posted by Maverick01
Member since Sep 2015
581 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:38 pm to
You're rude.
Posted by PepaSpray
Adamantium Membership
Member since Aug 2012
11080 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:38 pm to
quote:


It's the principle of it all. I purchased it on the assumption that what I was getting is what was advertised. Put yourself in my shoes. For example, say you ordered a shrimp poboy, and what you got was pastrami on rye, would you not be upset?


no. You ordered a shrimp poboy, hold the shrimp. You got what you ordered.
Posted by deaconjones35
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2009
9801 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:40 pm to
Sounds like you should move to California and be one of those pricks that sue companies over Prop 65 for a living, costing retail prices to rise because of frivolous lawsuits.
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
52743 posts
Posted on 7/1/16 at 7:43 pm to
Omg lol wow this great i wanna blow Ron Reagan
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram