- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
European coalition continues to strike ISIS.
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:16 am
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:16 am
US absent. We're really being pushed to the side. Amazing.
Russia, France, and UK Bomb Islamic State Targets
Russia, France, and UK Bomb Islamic State Targets
quote:
France and Russia launched fresh airstrikes on the Islamic State (IS) stronghold of Raqqa in northern Syria on Tuesday, as police made 128 overnight raids across France in the hunt for accomplices to Friday's Paris attacks claimed by the Islamist group.
In northern Iraq, British RAF Tornado fighter bombers attacked Islamic State militants targeting Kurdish forces, killing more than 30 people, the Ministry of Defence said.
French warplanes targeted a command centre and a recruitment centre for jihadists in Raqqa in the second consecutive night of strikes ordered by President Francois Hollande, a military command spokesman told Reuters.
Russia also launched new strikes on Raqqa. "At this moment, the Russians are in the process of strongly hitting the city of Raqqa, which is proof that they too are becoming conscious [of the threat from Islamic State]," a senior French government source said.
The action followed President Vladimir Putin's announcement that Moscow would intensify air strikes in Syria after Russia's Federal Security Service confirmed that a bomb caused the crash of a Russian tourist airliner over Egypt's Sinai peninsula in October.
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:17 am to RedRifle
quote:
US absent. We're really being pushed to the side. Amazing.
Is that a problem?
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:19 am to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
US absent. We're really being pushed to the side. Amazing.
With missiles costing several thousand dollars each, we can afford to sit out a couple of offensive drives.
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:20 am to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Is that a problem?
It's about time we got to sit one out to be honest.
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:20 am to RedRifle
quote:
We're really being pushed to the side.
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:20 am to Black n Gold
Several thousand each?
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:23 am to lsu480
quote:
Several thousand each?
Just googled...
quote:
Each missile cost $1.41 million. Raytheon Corp. is the manufacturer of the Tomahawk Block IV, a low-flying missile that travels at 550 miles per hour. During a decade of war in Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Libya, the Pentagon has increasingly relied on the Tomahawk
I was slightly off
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:24 am to lsu480
One hellfire missle costs $70,000
JDAM GBU-31 costs $18,000
Tomahawk missile: $1.4M
Flying a f-22 costs about $20,000/hr
JDAM GBU-31 costs $18,000
Tomahawk missile: $1.4M
Flying a f-22 costs about $20,000/hr
This post was edited on 11/17/15 at 10:25 am
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:25 am to Black n Gold
Hellfire missile = 70,000 ger. You just missed a zero.
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:27 am to RedRifle
quote:
US absent. We're really being pushed to the side. Amazing.
There was a story yesterday where we destroyed 114 ISIS fuel vehicles used for their oil operation.
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:28 am to RedRifle
Good. USA does not have to police the world. It's about time someone else takes the initiative. I fully support helping out if we need to but by all means I think the European allies are fully capable of dropping bombs on a bunch of Goat frickers with at most RPGs.
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:28 am to Tigeralum2008
quote:
One hellfire missle costs $70,00
JDAM GBU-31 costs $18,000
Tomahawk missile: $1.4M
Flying a f-22 costs about $20,000/hr
What's sad is that at least 70% of the people who think America is going to shite because of government spending and crippling national debt will bitch and moan about the US not leading the charge on this.
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:29 am to RedRifle
quote:
We're really being pushed to the side.
We are not being pushed to the side. The chief SJW in the white house has purposefully kept us to the side for years. We could have already bombed them back to 569 a.d. if there was any resolve within our leadership.
Just think of all the lives and dollars it could have saved over the years. An aside to this is we would have no terrorist activity within our borders with the exception of Timothy McVeigh and such.
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:30 am to RedRifle
It's like you aren't even aware that the US has been bombing the hell out of ISIS for a long time now. Let someone else spend some money for a change. Goddamn you morons think all this shite is free and the US military has to be involved everywhere all the time.
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:30 am to RedRifle
Being pushed aside is very far from the truth....shadows and shades
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:31 am to Black n Gold
Just a little. It's ridiculous how much they cost!
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:31 am to RedRifle
quote:You are obsessed with going to war.
US absent. We're really being pushed to the side. Amazing.
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:32 am to JohnnyKilroy
I have no problem with the US sitting it out, but do not kid yourself in claiming we are being "pushed aside". Do consider who the Commander in Chief is & what his military policy against ISIS consists of: committee meetings, conferences, containment, i.e. talking vs action.
Posted on 11/17/15 at 10:37 am to Black n Gold
quote:
With missiles costing tens of thousands of dollars and sometimes millions each, we can afford to sit out a couple of offensive drives.
This post was edited on 11/17/15 at 10:40 am
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News