- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Do you consider the tragic 2016 Baton Rouge shooting as an act of terrorism?
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:01 am
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:01 am
It involves a radical using violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aim. It wasn't some nut job that went crazy. It happened where police officers often congregate during a time of social unrest in Baton Rouge and in the US. His motivations were spelled out pretty clearly, and he traveled a long way to do it.
Do you consider that terrorism? How would you prevent that in the future if things heat up again with BLM?
Do you consider that terrorism? How would you prevent that in the future if things heat up again with BLM?
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:02 am to member12
Of course it was terrorism.
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:04 am to member12
“Unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.” (28 CFR § 0.85)
By definition, yes. He was acting according to his own social objectives in response to the Sterling shooting.
ETA: As tke noted, domestic terrorism. He acted as a lone wolf (homegrown violent extremist).
By definition, yes. He was acting according to his own social objectives in response to the Sterling shooting.
ETA: As tke noted, domestic terrorism. He acted as a lone wolf (homegrown violent extremist).
This post was edited on 4/27/17 at 8:06 am
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:06 am to member12
I think so, from what little I know.
That said, if he had personal beef with police and wanted to take revenge on a group of officers, I'd say no, not terrorism.
Still a tragedy and act of total cowardice, but not terrorism if motivated only or most predominately by personal animus.
That said, if he had personal beef with police and wanted to take revenge on a group of officers, I'd say no, not terrorism.
Still a tragedy and act of total cowardice, but not terrorism if motivated only or most predominately by personal animus.
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:08 am to member12
I think BRPD and LSP raided a house where people were collecting weapons last year during the protests.
They may have prevented another terrorist attack on Baton Rouge, New Orleans, or any random place.
They may have prevented another terrorist attack on Baton Rouge, New Orleans, or any random place.
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:11 am to LSUTigersVCURams
I think Dallas was too.
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:15 am to member12
quote:
I think Dallas was too
Yep. Most people get too caught up thinking terrorism is always Abu from X middle east country. Both BR and Dallas are textbook examples of domestic terrorism.
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:15 am to member12
Yes. Sadly it is difficult to prevent things like this. Luckily some badass BRPD officer put a lead present in his dome from a hundred yards away before he could do any more damage.
ETA: Thanks bojangles. Couldn't remember specifically.
ETA: Thanks bojangles. Couldn't remember specifically.
This post was edited on 4/27/17 at 8:23 am
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:16 am to StrongSafety
quote:
Yes, 100%.
Let me guess, you think OP is talking about the AS shooting.
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:17 am to LNCHBOX
No? Hes referring to the attacks on BRPD.
Those attacks were 100% terrorism.
Those attacks were 100% terrorism.
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:17 am to yellowhammer2098
quote:
Yes. Sadly it is difficult to prevent things like this. Luckily some badass sheriff put a lead present in his dome from a hundred yards away before he could do any more damage.
Not to sound petty or anything, but it was actually a SWAT guy from BRPD.
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:17 am to yellowhammer2098
It's certainly a concern since the findings of the investigation in the Sterling case will be released soon. Not everyone that comes to Baton Rouge (or any other protests that may erupt) will be there with non-violent intentions.
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:17 am to member12
Workplace violence according to the administration in power at that time.
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:19 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Let me guess, you think OP is talking about the AS shooting
To be clear, the OP is about the attack at Hammond Aire on July 17.
This post was edited on 4/27/17 at 8:21 am
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:25 am to Bojangles
quote:
Not to sound petty or anything, but it was actually a SWAT guy from BRPD.
He was behind a pillar or sign from the car wash there right? Or was he behind his vehicle on Airline?
It was a very good shot either way. The terrorist was all the way behind the fitness building at the time.
This post was edited on 4/27/17 at 8:25 am
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:29 am to member12
It's the very definition of domestic terrorism. OKC happened because of Waco, terrorism. All terrorism is done with an agendy, or reason
Posted on 4/27/17 at 8:59 am to member12
He wasn't Muslim so it can't be
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News