- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Denham and Walker Sue state
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:28 pm
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:28 pm
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:29 pm to OKellsBells
New tires for PJ's '92 prelude and for his dwelling.
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:39 pm to OKellsBells
I thought they did this a while back.
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:45 pm to OKellsBells
quote:
What will be the outcome?
Nothing. They sued in '83 as well. And... they won't tear the wall down unless there is federal money to do so.
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:47 pm to notiger1997
A few weeks ago I believe
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:49 pm to OKellsBells
quote:
Denham and Walker Sue state
They should sue for all the taxes they have been paying to build a diversion canal that hasn't been built.
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:14 pm to ForeverLSU02
It's very old news. This is a recent article. Do you have an opinion?
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:41 pm to OKellsBells
Can a city or municipality even sue a state?
Isn't the state (unless you sue a public figure in individual capacity) immune from suit under sovereign immunity?
Isn't the state (unless you sue a public figure in individual capacity) immune from suit under sovereign immunity?
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:48 pm to Forkbeard3777
I'm not a lawyer and really have no idea.
Posted on 1/9/17 at 4:40 am to SuperSaint
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/9/17 at 4:42 am
Posted on 1/9/17 at 6:27 am to OKellsBells
Guess we will have to tune in to find out. Hopefully their case has more details than your thread.
Posted on 1/9/17 at 8:22 am to OKellsBells
I'm confused as to how the wall caused the flooding, not saying it isn't true but can some one help me with an explanation?
Do they mean that the wall kept water from escaping in a certain direction and in turn caused the land in the opposite direction to flood?
Thanks in advance
Do they mean that the wall kept water from escaping in a certain direction and in turn caused the land in the opposite direction to flood?
Thanks in advance
Posted on 1/9/17 at 8:25 am to CrazyCow202
Yes the wall def. caused water to not be able to escape.
It didn't cause the flooding, but sure as hell seems to have made it worse in that area
It didn't cause the flooding, but sure as hell seems to have made it worse in that area
Posted on 1/9/17 at 8:30 am to OKellsBells
Mr. Edwards, tear down that wall!
Posted on 1/9/17 at 9:49 pm to notiger1997
A lot of people agree there was more flooding for some areas due to developments including I-12. I'm from this area and am curious about others' opinions.
Many of them would have had damage either way. It might be too difficult to determine all the people actually affected and their specific awards, based on how much more water they got that was "preventable."
If the cities win, individuals will probably not be awarded anything. The payout to the city could be squandered, or too small to make a difference toward improvements. If they lose, who paid for the court battle among the two governments?
Many of them would have had damage either way. It might be too difficult to determine all the people actually affected and their specific awards, based on how much more water they got that was "preventable."
If the cities win, individuals will probably not be awarded anything. The payout to the city could be squandered, or too small to make a difference toward improvements. If they lose, who paid for the court battle among the two governments?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News