Started By
Message

re: Chuck Yeager comments on the F-35 and F-22

Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:03 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421235 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:03 am to
quote:

And 10 years ago everyone was complaining about what a waste of money the F-22 was. That's why Congress cut production and only limited us to 187 of them. Everyone should calm down about the F-35. 10 years from now everyone will realize what that aircraft is capable of.

i believe the 2 are in different stratospheres of cost and are somewhat temporal contemporaries
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89465 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:05 am to
quote:

I don't understand the hate for the F35.


It's an expensive boondoggle on the order of the Bradley and the Crusader, combined. Failures and slow development can sometimes be excused if it isn't so cripplingly expensive.

In the F-35's case, it is not all on the contractor - they wanted to make this "every plane, for every one" - USAF, USN (carrier), STOL, export, the whole smash. They wanted it to be air-to-air, ground support, stealth and all that.

Something has to give and what's happened is - it doesn't do anything particularly well, costs well more than projected and is getting fielded much later in its development cycle than expected.

That's why the hate, although, again, it is largely a hell of the Pentagon's own making (with usual congressional and non-defense interference for purely political and not military goals).
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421235 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:06 am to
yeah i still have no clue why they wanted this "all in one" modular option

didn't the marines basically frick everything up with their demands?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89465 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:09 am to
quote:

didn't the marines basically frick everything up with their demands?


Honestly, the USN/USMC should have bid out an entirely separate plane and the F-35 should have been a straight replacement/upgrade for the F-16.

A lot of what the USMC wanted for STOL has been scrapped or scaled back (unless I missed something). But wanting it to do that, plus the CVN landings, plus all the other, gee whiz, F-22 "light" features (which it will never be a stellar air-to-air platform - there is a lot of parity with the foreign competitors now - because of the relatively slow fielding). Hell, as it is, we should already be looking at the successor for the F-22 - not because it is not capable, but the design is a little older and we've only got about 180 of them.

The "thousands" of F-35s are obviously never going to materialize now. Lesson learned (I suppose).
Posted by Reservoir dawg
Member since Oct 2013
14094 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:15 am to
The F-35 will be perfectly fine for it's role. A precision strike aircraft. It will never be a mainline fighter, and it will never be a CAP aircraft.
Posted by Reservoir dawg
Member since Oct 2013
14094 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:21 am to
Good post. The Navy needs an upgrade to the Super Hornet before we do anything else.
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17447 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:23 am to
F-35 is having even more problems..
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34506 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 10:58 am to
frick y'all

I miss this bad boy




Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17447 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 11:35 am to
quote:

I miss this bad boy


Man I haven't seen one fly in quite some time. Love the high-viz Jolly Roger scheme (The Final Countdown was and is my favorite jet movie) on that A model.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 3:13 pm to
I'm mostly impressed he didn't write it in all caps.
Posted by kfaulk03
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2007
1479 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 3:57 pm to
A single Air Force F-35A costs a whopping $148 million. One Marine Corps F-35B costs an unbelievable $251 million. A lone Navy F-35C costs a mind-boggling $337 million. Average the three models together, and a “generic” F-35 costs $178 million



It's disgusting. What a massive waste. Think of the military as a heavily armed post office or DMV.
Posted by Reservoir dawg
Member since Oct 2013
14094 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 7:57 pm to
You'll have to go to Iran to see an F-14 fly.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 8:05 pm to
Dumb question

How is the number picked

Why aren't these F-17 and F-18?
Posted by Supravol22
Member since Jan 2011
14408 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 8:16 pm to
There were other planes given those numbers but weren't approved for production.

Also, the F-18 was actually the YF-17 when it competed against the F-16 to be the AF's new fighter in the 70s. It was defeated but soon after picked up by the Navy and renamed the F-18.

For instance, the F-22 competed against the YF-23 and won. Here's the YF-23 Black Widow


Posted by Lsuchs
Member since Apr 2013
8073 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

We just don't currently need an entire air force comprised of the 22


You never do until you do.

And a reason we won't need them is because we have them.
The political negotiating power tools like this bring can be even more valuable too
Posted by Redbone
my castle
Member since Sep 2012
18828 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

the F15 which is an airframe designed in the 1970's.

It was placed in service in '73 I believe. If so the design and development was probably started in the '60s.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

Chuck Yeager


Dropping truth bombs.

Yeager Bombs.
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34506 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 8:59 pm to
Last time they had the air show in Nola an F-14 flew...

They also had a flyby with a p-51, f-15, and the f-22. That was badass
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 9:00 pm to
Chuck Yeager is a cocky a-hole. But he has brass balls and he's definitely earned the right to be a cocky a-hole.
Posted by Lsuchs
Member since Apr 2013
8073 posts
Posted on 8/25/16 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

The F35 maybe, but the F22 is replacing the F15 which is an airframe designed in the 1970's


The F35 is more expensive than it should be due to delays, but it is an incredible aircraft.

People read articles saying it lost in a dogfight to a 4th generation fighter, look at the price tag, and lose it.
It has a lot of capabilities we don't and won't know about for a long time. Things are even left out on versions to be sent to our allies/partners.

One example most probably don't know:
The F35 can send a binary code into a closed radar network implementing a virus and shut down entire areas of ground based air detection.
It can shoot 1s and 0s into your radar sending a virus to the computer and others on the closed network...
This post was edited on 8/25/16 at 9:14 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram