- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Charlotte Police Shooting Videos Released (links in OP)
Posted on 9/24/16 at 6:28 pm to tgrbaitn08
Posted on 9/24/16 at 6:28 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
it looks to me as though he was walking backwards, so that means either the cop shot him in his chest as he was walking away with his hands down or he was shot in the back by a cop that was behind him
That's what I'm interested in. If he was shot in the chest and there was an officer behind him that he was moving towards, that could go either way. But it's also a very dangerous shot to take.
1
Posted on 9/24/16 at 6:46 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Donald Chick Foret ?@chickforet
After listening to family attorney in Scott shooting, it is obvious to me that he has shifted focus to civil case by using word negligence.
Donald Chick Foret ?@chickforet
Scott family attorney also talked about "lack of training". That means to me they know no criminal charges are likely. Remedy is civil case.
This post was edited on 9/24/16 at 6:49 pm
Posted on 9/24/16 at 7:21 pm to rt3
Charlotte will settle with the family and this will go away fairly quickly.
Standard Operating Procedure.
Standard Operating Procedure.
This post was edited on 9/24/16 at 7:22 pm
Posted on 9/24/16 at 7:34 pm to JackTMed
Hands down, man down
Posted on 9/24/16 at 7:38 pm to Poodlebrain
Bullshite. You are an idiot
Posted on 9/24/16 at 7:39 pm to Poodlebrain
quote:The rioting is not the fault of the rioters?
The rioting is the fault of the police, not the rioters or those who agitated them.
Posted on 9/24/16 at 7:40 pm to TitleistProV1X
quote:
hadn't read a book since he was in high school.
He went to high school????
Posted on 9/24/16 at 10:21 pm to rt3
Video leaves a lot to be desired. I would not call lit "indisputable evidence" as the chief stated. Cannot see if he had a gun. But we certainly can't believe his wife who said "he does not have a gun". I agree with the officers not being charged, unless a clear video comes out showing he did not have a gun in his hands.
Not sure of this other video made it in the thread. Probably did. Just in case. Does not add much.
LINK
Not sure of this other video made it in the thread. Probably did. Just in case. Does not add much.
LINK
This post was edited on 9/24/16 at 10:27 pm
Posted on 9/24/16 at 11:16 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Is there any evidence of his Traumatic Brain Injury? She said he had just taken his medicine, was it recovered at the scene?
Also, can you read a book with a Traumatic Brain Injury?
Also, can you read a book with a Traumatic Brain Injury?
Posted on 9/24/16 at 11:20 pm to Balloon Huffer
His medicine was the weed.
Posted on 9/24/16 at 11:42 pm to Balloon Huffer
quote:
Also, can you read a book with a Traumatic Brain Injury?
Sure, unless the TBI affected areas specific to reading. I have not seen anything about the specifics of his alleged TBI.
I am not sure why the cops just did not let his wife try to talk with him. Or maybe she did not even offer. I can guarantee you if that was a relative of mine I would have pled with the officers to let me do that
Posted on 9/24/16 at 11:55 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Another angle. Don't know if anyone posted this one
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 9/24/16 at 11:56 pm
Posted on 9/25/16 at 12:31 am to kc8876
Wait a second. This mfer had an ankle holster on, according to the cops. In that video he reached toward his leg right before they shot him.
Posted on 9/25/16 at 12:42 am to baybeefeetz
Somebody help me with this one. Did he have the fun in his hand or did he reach for his ankle like I think I see?0
Posted on 9/25/16 at 1:10 am to baybeefeetz
It sounds like the first shot went off before he made a move towards his ankle. Looks more like reaction to getting shot
Posted on 9/25/16 at 1:13 am to UHTiger
Ah, I had it really quiet because it's so late here.
Posted on 9/25/16 at 1:22 am to tigerfan182
Maybe, but at least I know what sarcasm is.
Posted on 9/25/16 at 1:30 am to StrongBackWeakMind
quote:The rioters think of themselves as victims, and victims are never at fault. Someone else is always at fault, and the police are a convenient antagonist. First they were believed to have unjustly shot a man. Now that evidence the shooting was justified is becoming available they need a new excuse. I jokingly posited that they would continue to blame the police, but for a different reason.
The rioting is not the fault of the rioters?
There is no question that the rioters are responsible for their individual conduct. However they do not see it that way.
Posted on 9/25/16 at 3:21 am to LSUTANGERINE
Regardless, if he had a gun, he made no attempt to raise his arm to threaten anyone. I am no liberal, but the video I just watched was a needless shooting.
Posted on 9/25/16 at 5:29 am to phaz
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/25/16 at 5:30 am
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News