Started By
Message

Am I the only person who doesn't want driverless cars?

Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:00 pm
Posted by TigersHuskers
Nebraska
Member since Oct 2014
11310 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:00 pm
I actually enjoy driving and I'm not ready to have the govt tell me that I'm no longer allowed to do something that I've done since age 15 legally.
Posted by Asharad
Tiamat
Member since Dec 2010
5684 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:02 pm to
I only know of one other. And she doesn't post here.
This post was edited on 12/29/16 at 12:03 pm
Posted by CoachChappy
Member since May 2013
32504 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

I actually enjoy driving

Ok, not me but ok
quote:

I'm not ready to have the govt tell me that I'm no longer allowed to do something that I've done since age 15 legally.

WAT?
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64073 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:03 pm to
I'm with you. I love driving. Maybe in 40 years when my reaction time is diminishing and I become a threat to others, but frick this 10-15 years crap that people spout all the time. In reality, I think it'll be quite a while before this becomes the norm for the majority of drivers on the road.
This post was edited on 12/29/16 at 12:05 pm
Posted by Not Cooper
Member since Jun 2015
4674 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:05 pm to
I would like the option to drive when I want to, but when stuck in traffic or driving late at night/early in the morning I tend to wish there was an option for the car to drive itself.
Posted by Sparkplug#1
Member since May 2013
7352 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:05 pm to
I'm not really liking the idea. Will I still be able to speed? Can I still run from the cops? Can I still park illegally? Can I still do donuts in an open field?
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77405 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:07 pm to
it will making road fapping way more easy
Posted by TheAlmightySmash
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2014
5479 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

I actually enjoy driving

I do to some extent. I never get motion sickness while i'm driving.
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:08 pm to
I can't wait for driverless cars.
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77405 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Will I still be able to speed?



without traffic jams there will be no need to speed.

quote:

Can I still park illegally?


your car will drive you to your destination then go park itself

Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101915 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

I'm not ready to have the govt tell me that I'm no longer allowed to do something that I've done since age 15 legally.


Why would you no longer be allowed to?

Just because some people will opt for driverless cars and chill with a beer or three while cruising from point A to point B doesn't mean you have to.
Posted by TigrrrDad
Member since Oct 2016
7095 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:09 pm to
Driving is one of life's great pleasures. They can pry the wheel from my cold dead fingers.
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

They can pry the wheel from my cold dead fingers.
Chances of this happening are exponentially higher with humans driving cars vs robots driving cars.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:10 pm to
I have no problem with minority report style.

All highways and interstates ares driverless. Inner cities and roads you drive yourself.

No traffic, 100mph, automated commute sounds fricking awesome.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33313 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:11 pm to
quote:


Just because some people will opt for driverless cars and chill with a beer or three while cruising from point A to point B doesn't mean you have to.
Eventually, driverless cars will be mandated. Any other setup will be deemed immoral due to lives being needlessly put at risk.
Posted by TigersHuskers
Nebraska
Member since Oct 2014
11310 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:11 pm to
The govt will legislate it through making insurance companies charge people who drive more money for their premiums.
Posted by pcolatiger28
Pensacola, Fl
Member since Apr 2009
1284 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:15 pm to
As long as it's optional I'm good with it. If it becomes mandatory by law, then I guess no more taking the muscle car out for a spin, or a classic, or a jacked truck with big nuts. In all seriousness some of us like to fire up the old V8 and go for a spin or take the old Bronco 4x4 out to the country for some off-roading. It would be great for the elderly and clueless drivers.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101915 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

The govt will legislate it through making insurance companies charge people who drive more money for their premiums.


Well, eventually they probably should pay more if they want to engage manual drive mode more often. They are at more risk.
Posted by When in Rome
Telegraph Road
Member since Jan 2011
35537 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:18 pm to
I'm more curious about how they plan to address the moral dilemmas driverless cars will face.

Driverless Cars will Face Moral Dilemmas

quote:

A self-driving car carrying a family of four on a rural two-lane highway spots a bouncing ball ahead. As the vehicle approaches a child runs out to retrieve the ball. Should the car risk its passengers’ lives by swerving to the side—where the edge of the road meets a steep cliff? Or should the car continue on its path, ensuring its passengers’ safety at the child’s expense? This scenario and many others pose moral and ethical dilemmas that carmakers, car buyers and regulators must address before vehicles should be given full autonomy, according to a study published Thursday in Science.

The study highlights paradoxes facing carmakers, car buyers and regulators as driverless technology accelerates. Most of the 1,928 research participants in the Science report indicated that they believed vehicles should be programmed to crash into something rather than run over pedestrians, even if that meant killing the vehicle’s passengers. “The algorithms that control [autonomous vehicles] will need to embed moral principles guiding their decisions in situations of unavoidable harm,” according to the researchers at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Oregon and France’s Toulouse School of Economics for the National Center for Scientific Research.

Yet many of the same study participants balked at the idea of buying such a vehicle, preferring to ride in a driverless car that prioritizes their own safety above that of pedestrians. The researchers concluded that if lawmakers were to prioritize pedestrians over passengers when regulating self-driving vehicles, people would be less likely to buy those vehicles. A shrinking market for driverless cars would slow their development despite research showing that autonomous vehicles could potentially reduce traffic, cut pollution and save thousands of lives each year—human error contributes to 90 percent of all traffic accidents.

Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83395 posts
Posted on 12/29/16 at 12:19 pm to
Driving is one of my favorite things on earth. No joke.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram