Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Yet another 49ers thread...

Posted on 11/18/13 at 8:25 pm
Posted by 9BREES9
Thibodaux
Member since Jan 2009
1370 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 8:25 pm
These asswipes have gotten away w/ so many no calls the past 2 times these teams have hooked up it's unreal. the two that stick out to me are the obvious helmet to helmet hit on PT in the playoffs by Donte Whitner and then again last year when Goldson hit a defenseless Colston and Colston was lucky to not break his damn neck on the play. So, for one personal foul penalty to finally go our way....FACK THEM! That entire team is full of tPOS. They can keep whining; I don't feel bad one damn bit. Here's the pics











Oh and.....MotherFACKING WHODAT
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
117676 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 8:26 pm to
Let's all move on. 24 hour rule.
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160104 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 8:33 pm to
That helmet to helmet hit was the first thing I thought of when they started bitching
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 8:39 pm to
The best part is they actually believe they got screwed.

I love it.
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 8:46 pm to
Im a huge saints fan but it wasnt a penalty on the hit on Pierre Thomas...... Read a rule book please
Posted by 9BREES9
Thibodaux
Member since Jan 2009
1370 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 8:46 pm to
I love it too. I also love how at halftime last night they mentioned Seattle and Carolina as the two teams that have the best shot to win the NFC. I love flying under the radar. Makes it all the more sweeter when we prove them wrong.
Posted by 9BREES9
Thibodaux
Member since Jan 2009
1370 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 8:54 pm to
How the hell do you not realize that's a helmet to helmet hit? Wasn't even close to using his shoulder pad on that play.
Posted by TigerSaints318
Shreveport
Member since Dec 2009
1794 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

Im a huge saints fan but it wasnt a penalty on the hit on Pierre Thomas...... Read a rule book please


I thought it was when I watched the game, but saw I was wrong later. Is it because Pierre lowered his head?
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 9:15 pm to
Ok maybe i should rephrase that, it was definitely a helmet to helmet hit but its not a penalty when you have a running back and a defender go helmet to helmet
Posted by miketiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2005
1674 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 9:24 pm to
Rule book folks.
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15761 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

but it wasnt a penalty on the hit on Pierre Thomas...... Read a rule book please
Lol explain
Posted by Athanatos
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
8140 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

Ok maybe i should rephrase that, it was definitely a helmet to helmet hit but its not a penalty when you have a running back and a defender go helmet to helmet


This. Please stop stating that this was a bad call. An odd rule that RBs don't get the same protections? Yes. But not a bad call.
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15761 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

its not a penalty when you have a running back and a defender go helmet to helmet
someone tell James Harrison he needs to get his money back for those fines he was given on helmet to helmet hits he made on running backs
This post was edited on 11/18/13 at 9:35 pm
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 9:35 pm to
Jesus Christ people, are you telling me you think a player(running back) that is allowed to lower his helmet before contact can be the beneficiary of a helmet to helmet call??? Yall are so cute at this age....
Posted by 9BREES9
Thibodaux
Member since Jan 2009
1370 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 9:40 pm to
Allow me to explain why THAT helmet to helmet hit gets me so upset. If not for that hit and PT being lights out and fumbling; we're going in for a touchdown on the opening drive and that's the difference in that game. Period. We'd have our 2nd Lombardi by now and there's no way the Giants beat us in the Dome in the NFC championship game. Who knows how much of the game plan involved PT. The rule book can say whatever it wants but it sucks more knowing what could have been.
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 9:44 pm to
I agree with you about that, if we score on that first drive we're on our way and crush the giants again in the Dome the next week, but it was still a legal hit. Im more upset with Pierre not taking a more defensive angle and just going down
Posted by ruzil
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2012
16862 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

I agree with you about that, if we score on that first drive we're on our way and crush the giants again in the Dome the next week, but it was still a legal hit. Im more upset with Pierre not taking a more defensive angle and just going down


Giving up your body for a td is not a laudible goal?
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 9:58 pm to
Not when the odds of fumbling are that much higher
Posted by PelicanPoop
New Orleans
Member since Oct 2013
583 posts
Posted on 11/18/13 at 10:06 pm to
Posted by ruzil
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2012
16862 posts
Posted on 11/19/13 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

Not when the odds of fumbling are that much higher


Sounds like you need to quit your day job and prognosticate in Vegas since your ability to predict precisely when a fumble will occur is uncanny.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram