Started By
Message
locked post

would you have gone for it

Posted on 9/15/13 at 5:57 pm
Posted by BCSmess
earth
Member since Jan 2013
440 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 5:57 pm
1 ts rule in football.....dont take points off the board
Posted by liquid rabbit
Boxtard BPB®© emeritus
Member since Mar 2006
60248 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 5:58 pm to
I would have gone for it with a running back. Not Ingram.
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 5:58 pm to
so many variables. i don't mind going for it there.
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
32383 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 5:58 pm to
Dude stop fricking posting.
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 5:58 pm to
it was an opportunity to really put this game away before half
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143616 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 5:58 pm to
yes. Give it to the better short yardage back: Sproles
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 5:58 pm to
Yes, but I'd have thrown it

Ingram wouldn't even be an option
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
36791 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 5:59 pm to
I'd absolutely go for it but not with Ingram.
Posted by BasClas
Member since Feb 2007
7881 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 6:00 pm to
I would have gone for it before the penalty on the field goal.
Posted by Jaydeaux
Covington
Member since May 2005
18746 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

I would have gone for it with a running back. Not Ingram.


Exactly, Ingram couldn't move an old lady in a wheel chair. Does he think he's going to go in untouched in the NFL? Beat 1 guy, make it happen.
Posted by Swirl
Member since Jun 2013
49 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 6:00 pm to
Lol
Posted by Fanofages
Denham Springs,La.
Member since Jun 2013
672 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 6:00 pm to
Ingram is a joke had to bea
One man I agree should of taken points there but it is really sad to see Ingram not beat his one man
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
36808 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 6:01 pm to
I would have gone for it unless the plan was to handoff to Ingram.
Posted by nvasil1
Hellinois
Member since Oct 2009
15871 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 6:01 pm to
Definitely

but

quote:

Ingram wouldn't even be an option
Posted by GeauxGus
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2005
5219 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 6:01 pm to
..prolly ... But not w/ Ingram
Posted by OneFifty
No favorite team now
Member since Aug 2012
3872 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 6:02 pm to
Ditto
Posted by TigerJeff
the Emerald Coast
Member since Oct 2006
16356 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 6:03 pm to
yes
Posted by cssamerican
Member since Mar 2011
7105 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 6:05 pm to
Yes, and I was all for it until I seen 22 in the huddle.
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
45071 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 6:05 pm to
Normally with such short yardage I would have went for it. But with the way the first half has went their is no way I would went for it. Especially with the that walking vagina wearing #22.
Posted by tigerd60
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Jan 2013
159 posts
Posted on 9/15/13 at 6:08 pm to
I think we all agree, yes but not with Ingram
Shoulda had Sproles run the ball on that play
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram