Would you be mad if the saints drafted a Rb with #12

Damn Goodell fricked us again I see.......bastard made us give up the 11 for the 12

If all the premier defenders are off the board at 12 and then best value is a great offensive prospect, I'm all for it.

quote:

---

if the saints drafted a Rb with #12

---

At 11, I really hope we get a starter.

I wouldn't mind Curtis Samuel if he is there at #42. He will contribute immediately on ST, but can also be a solid change of pace RB or a slot WR.

I wouldn't mind that at all as long as we drafted a DE at #11.

I won't be surprised if we don't pick anyone at 12

I would be thrilled with McCaffrey, as he would add a dimension to our offense that we haven't had since letting Sproles leave us. He wouldn't be just another running back.

That said, if we take McCaffrey at 11, we'd better damn sure address defense with the next couple picks. No getting cute and drafting a QB at 32 or 43 if we go offense at 11 (and vice versa, should we select the QB of the future at 11).

If Fournette us there at 11 and we have traded for Butler somehow then I wouldnt mind. But if we still need a DE and CBS we better not get too cute.

Problem with drafting a rb high is you don't save any money on his rookie deal unlike with a CB, LT, DE, or QB.

I would not say replacement. It would be his compliment. Ingram is still very young and could get a third contract from us.

I would not be surprised if after this season we give him a 3 year extension.

He will compliment this season, replace next season