Started By
Message

re: Was Morten Andersen really that good?

Posted on 8/5/13 at 4:48 pm to
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 8/5/13 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

I've always wondered if you were excluding ST in this little declaration.


Depends on the day of the week and the time of the year...

For example, think about the game day threads...
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
32846 posts
Posted on 8/5/13 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

For example, think about the game day threads...


WE'RE GONNA GET BLOWN OUT!!!
Posted by fatheadgator
Sanford, Fl
Member since Oct 2006
1354 posts
Posted on 8/5/13 at 4:59 pm to
I remember the year after he left, the dirty birds beat us off one of his long FGs
Posted by Slapouttiger
alabama
Member since Jun 2011
3087 posts
Posted on 8/5/13 at 5:33 pm to
If you remember he missed a short one in the playoffs that sent the falcons home from the playoffs. He missed it on purpose cause his heart was in New Orleans
Posted by fischd1
Mandeville
Member since Dec 2007
2819 posts
Posted on 8/5/13 at 10:53 pm to
BEST EVER
Posted by Bayou
CenLA
Member since Feb 2005
36733 posts
Posted on 8/6/13 at 7:41 am to
quote:

Was Morten Andersen really that good?

Yes - thread over
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166042 posts
Posted on 8/6/13 at 9:04 am to
quote:

Yes - thread over



he had a strong leg that attempted a lot of longer fg's, missed a lot of them too, was incredible on kickoffs, not sure how above and beyond special he was comparatively speaking to other good kickers under 40 though.
Posted by rpg37
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Sep 2008
47332 posts
Posted on 8/6/13 at 9:33 pm to
While kicking has not evolved in the last 25 years, one noticeable difference is the number of indoor/outdoor stadiums. When he first started, the majority were outdoors where FG% is obviously lower. Keep that in mind when looking at sheer percentage.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22362 posts
Posted on 8/7/13 at 5:31 am to
I think kicking haa "evolved" in the last 10 or so yrs. plus like others said, he attempted a lot more "long" fgs bc of the saints offense woes. compare his stats to his peers during the same time frame and see what u get.
This post was edited on 8/7/13 at 5:33 am
Posted by putt1058
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2008
842 posts
Posted on 8/7/13 at 7:18 am to
Andersen's kicking "opportunities" were increased by playing on a offensively conservative team. I think Carl Smith was the OC, and it seemed like anytime we got inside the opponent's 40 yard line, Morten was warming up. NO killer instinct or aggressive play calling of any kind. So YES, he was that good...especially when the game was on the line and the FG was a long one! Mr. Clutch.
Posted by Bayou
CenLA
Member since Feb 2005
36733 posts
Posted on 8/7/13 at 7:54 am to
Stop it. Morten's time in New Orleans is a no brainer whether or not he was THAT good. He WAS!
Posted by GruntbyAssociation
Member since Jul 2013
3514 posts
Posted on 8/7/13 at 9:28 am to
Yes
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
25179 posts
Posted on 11/11/13 at 11:53 am to
bump because this actually was a good thread on kicking and boy was i wrong
Posted by Slapouttiger
alabama
Member since Jun 2011
3087 posts
Posted on 11/11/13 at 12:05 pm to
He had a cannon for a leg.
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
77313 posts
Posted on 11/11/13 at 1:35 pm to
It may have gotten lost in this thread, but kickers have evolved. They are much better at their craft than they used to be. They make field goals at a much higher rate now than they used to. I'd be curious to see the % of made fg's 40-49 now compared to 20 years ago. Its probably gone up a good bit. The may need to consider bringing the goal posts in a couple feet on each side.
Posted by infantry1026
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2010
6030 posts
Posted on 11/11/13 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Was Morten Andersen really that good?


Um....yes....yes he was!

As someone who grew up watching Morten...I can't speak to all of the kicker of the NFL prior to him. BUT I can say that there hasn't been anyone as good in the NFL since then. (Maybe Adam V. in his prime). If kickers must be inducted into the hall; than I would not have a problem with it being these two.
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 11/11/13 at 2:03 pm to
I know who's not good...Hartley.
Posted by blueslover
deeper than deep south
Member since Sep 2007
22792 posts
Posted on 11/11/13 at 2:11 pm to
League wide avg of pct FG made & Anderson

When he started fulltime 1983- 68.2% 75.0%

mid career 1993- 76.6% 80.0%

toward the end 2003- 79.2% 80.0%

Kickers have only gotten better & better year by year. Over his career the average kicker in the NFL was successful 10% more. Last year the avg. was 83.9%. So another 10% better in the past 10 years.

A major factor in old guys FG% was also that the rule was if you missed a FG the ball was spotted at the 20yd line not the line of scrimmage. So they made a heckuva a lot more long attempts. If you missed the ball still went forward. If Dempsey had missed his 63yder, instead of the LOS at about their own 44 the ball would have been placed 36 yds down the field.

Posted by Laaz2750
Los Angeles
Member since Aug 2008
8377 posts
Posted on 11/11/13 at 2:14 pm to
He was amazing. Watching those games back in the day I used to think the offense gave up on 3rd and long anywhere inside the 40 because they knew they had 3 points in the bag.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278080 posts
Posted on 11/11/13 at 2:17 pm to
he was the best long distance kicker of that era. That is why he was loved as much as he was


plus if you are anywhere between 30-40, he prob banged your mom
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram