Saints big board photo... | TigerDroppings.com
Posted by
Message
THRILLHO
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2006
38115 posts
Online

Saints big board photo...

stolen from SR. Looks like:
3. Joekel
4. Warmack
5. Jordan
6. Johnson
7. Richardson
8. Cooper
9. Ansah
10. Mingo
11. Star
12. Austin
13. Eifert
14. Hayden

23. Teo
24. Pugh
25. B. Warner
26. D. Jones
27. E. Reid
28. C. Patterson
29. Trufant
30.
31. Nassib
32. Barkley

Image: http://prod.images.saints.clubs.nflcdn.com/image-web/NFL/CDA/data/deployed/prod/SAINTS/assets/images/imported/NO/photos/clubimages/2013/04-April/temp_4250011--nfl_mezz_1280_1024.JPG?width=960&height=720



jembeurt
LSU Fan
Raceland
Member since Apr 2008
5997 posts

re: Saints big board photo...
Thats pretty interesting. I can't see if that is Vaccaro at 15.

Also, I wonder if they make a move to get Nassib since he is so high on their board?


yurintroubl
New Orleans Saints Fan
Dallas, Tx.
Member since Apr 2008
27255 posts

re: Saints big board photo...
quote:


Also, I wonder if they make a move to get Nassib since he is so high on their board?






jembeurt
LSU Fan
Raceland
Member since Apr 2008
5997 posts

re: Saints big board photo...
Sorry. I've been cooking and I just checked and saw he was selected.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
AtlantaLSUfan
LSU Fan
now back in Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2009
9407 posts

re: Saints big board photo...
quote:

32. Barkley


Why rank him at 32 if you're not going to take him at 80?


memphstigers23
Ole Miss Fan
Fenway Pahk
Member since Mar 2012
10278 posts

re: Saints big board photo...
quote:

23. Teo



Replies (0)
Replies (0)
saintsfan22
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
29174 posts
Online

re: Saints big board photo...
So Star was the pick if Carolina didn't frick it up?


xxKylexx
LSU Fan
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2011
1991 posts

re: Saints big board photo...
I don't think the Saints expected Terron Armstead (and Johnathan Jenkins for that matter) to fall. We had to go for need there and something tells me the Saints really did want to take Barkley haha.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
Lester Earl
LSU Fan
#buganation
Member since Nov 2003
194511 posts

re: Saints big board photo...
quote:

So Star was the pick if Carolina didn't frick it up?




well they passed on Eifert, who was higher. So im not sure.

not even sure if that is their big board.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
bonethug0108
New Orleans Saints Fan
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
5654 posts

re: Saints big board photo...
quote:

Why rank him at 32 if you're not going to take him at 80?
It's also about need. We have much greater needs elsewhere outside of backup QB.

Now if the top QBs fell to the 5th-6th round they'd take a long look.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
bonethug0108
New Orleans Saints Fan
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
5654 posts

re: Saints big board photo...
quote:

So Star was the pick if Carolina didn't frick it up?
No, it's also about need. It's possible they could have grabbed him, but if they have 5 guys rated similar they are going with the higher need. Safety was the highest need outside of LT.

Same thing with the OGs. If one had fell to use they would have had to have a much much higher grade than our needs.

Then again, that may not be our ranking board. It could have been our projection board(sure looks more like a mock draft w/ trades than a ranking board). So this could all be moot.
This post was edited on 4/27 at 1:07 pm


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
504Voodoo
Southeastern LA Fan
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2012
3252 posts

re: Saints big board photo...
quote:

23. Teo


Well that was a little too close for comfort.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
954 posts

re: Saints big board photo...
Damn, I wonder if we had Vaccaro rated number 1 or 2? The only people not on that list who were drafted ahead of our spot were Fisher, Vaccaro, Milliner, and Fluker. I'm sure Fisher had one of the top spots, but I could see the Saints having Vaccaro above Fluker and Milliner.

If this is truly their board, it would make sense that Vaccaro would be in the 2 spot, else Eifert would've been rated higher and he was available at our selection.

If so, either this team thinks extremely highly of Vaccaro, or extremely lowly of the guys we currently have.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
Page 1 of 1

Back to top

Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram