Started By
Message

re: NFL presented Vilma w/sworn affidavit of GW stating Vilma offered 10k for Favre

Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:15 pm to
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
26483 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:15 pm to
Anyone have a link to the affadavit?
Posted by kclsufan
Show Me
Member since Jun 2008
12092 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:16 pm to
Declaration

*Here's where I fricked up---sowwee*
This post was edited on 9/17/12 at 7:42 pm
Posted by angryslugs
Member since Apr 2008
10181 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:17 pm to
Fujita meets with him tomorrow. I'm expecting a verbal teabagging of Goodell
Posted by eyeran
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2007
22095 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:20 pm to
Vilma is fighting his case. Nothing on Fujita. The evidence on Hargrove was wrong.

Have they mentioned why Will Smith was suspended; outside of being a "leader" on the defense?
Posted by kclsufan
Show Me
Member since Jun 2008
12092 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

Have they mentioned why Will Smith was suspended; outside of being a "leader" on the defense?

*Another frick up--damn, I could work for the league office*
This post was edited on 9/17/12 at 7:43 pm
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
26483 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

Actually it's not a notarized, sworn Affidavit, just a declaration, and was NOT given under penalty of perjury, unlike what Fujita, Vitt, etc signed. Depending on the quality of the paper, GW's declaration may or may not make good toilet paper. The fact that it is not a sworn affidavit is HUGE IMO.


Who do we have that also signed a "sworn affadavit?"

It's gotta be our word versus their word. It's only a matter of time before this case jumps into the Courts where, please Jesus, it gets the due process it deserves.

I'm with Terry Bradshaw on BountyGate: either show us the evidence in its entirety or drop the shite and admit you made a mistake.
Posted by Mr Breeze
The Lunatic Fringe
Member since Dec 2010
5932 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

kclsufan


This for the explanation it helps this non-lawyer better understand why Godell is a slime bucket.

Posted by motorbreath
New Orleans Saints fan
Member since Jun 2004
6381 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:25 pm to
So it's not even a real affidavit? What kind of a shite operation is goodell running?
Posted by Hoodoo Man
Sunshine Pumping most days.
Member since Oct 2011
31637 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

That affidavit 1st reported by @AdamSchefter. Vilma's atty said he has 8 or 9 affidavits from players, coaches, etc exonerating his client.

Goodell: "Mmmmm, yeah, but GW's affadavit is like 10 times as evidence-y as any of yours. So I have more evidence."
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
26483 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:27 pm to
quote:


Goodell: "Mmmmm, yeah, but GW's affadavit is like 10 times as evidence-y as any of yours. So I have more evidence."


Apparently GW's "affadavit" isn't really an affadavit.
Posted by MottLaneKid
Gonzales
Member since Apr 2012
4543 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:27 pm to
Roger Goodell is unfit to be a commisioner of a Pop Warner league. I say this seriously, RG should be implicated in fraudulant behaviour and should be looking at some serious prison time. RG is a piece of trash; he is dishonest, and should be dealt with accordingly.

I would never threaten another man's life but this world be better off if Goodell was no longer involved in professional sports.
Posted by Hoodoo Man
Sunshine Pumping most days.
Member since Oct 2011
31637 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:28 pm to
Yeah, but Goodell is speaking in my post, so he'd still refer to it as an affadavit.

Boom, not wrong.
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
26483 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

Yeah, but Goodell is speaking in my post, so he'd still refer to it as an affadavit.

Boom, not wrong.




Basically, GW's "affadavit" carries the same legal weight as if I sat down, typed an "affadavit" on Microsoft Word, and submitted it to be reviewed by Roger Goodell.
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:30 pm to
Posted by motorbreath
New Orleans Saints fan
Member since Jun 2004
6381 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:30 pm to
yo OP...edit "sworn affidavit" out of that subject line.
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
26483 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:31 pm to
quote:

Roger Goodell is unfit to be a commisioner of a Pop Warner league. I say this seriously, RG should be implicated in fraudulant behaviour and should be looking at some serious prison time. RG is a piece of trash; he is dishonest, and should be dealt with accordingly.

I would never threaten another man's life but this world be better off if Goodell was no longer involved in professional sports.


Patience, my fellow member of the Who Dat Nation.

Once this thing gains traction in the Courts, we will have our justice.
Posted by blueslover
deeper than deep south
Member since Sep 2007
22792 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:31 pm to
do ya swear it would?
Posted by kclsufan
Show Me
Member since Jun 2008
12092 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:32 pm to
Here's some more on Affidavits vs. Declarations:

LINK

quote:

Affidavits are written documents attached to an oath or some affirmation (i.e., notary public) that the statements in the affidavit are true. Declarations are merely written documents that the author believes to be true, but the statements are given without the author being sworn in by a court officer. Declarations under the penalty of perjury (sometimes referred to as sworn statements) are very similar to affidavits Courts consider both to be legally equivalent, though most court systems and businesses still prefer affidavits over declarations.

Signature Requirements
Affidavits are signed in front of a notary public or commissioner of oaths and require notarization. Declarations must be signed only by the author, though sometimes before a justice of the peace or, at least, legal counsel. U.S. Code 1746 permits an individual to submit as true a declaration under the penalty of perjury.

Wording
Both affidavits and declarations require signatures of the authors. One who submits an affidavit is referred to as a "affiant." One who gives a declaration is called a "declarant." Declarations under the penalty of perjury must be accompanied by a statement in substantially this form: "I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct," as well as the date on which it was executed and the declarant's signature.

Usage
Affidavits are used for court proceedings and legal documents, such as voter registration. When there is concrete evidence to which someone must swear, affidavits are still used more often than declarations. For patent registration, name changes and evidence testimony in which the the events are not absolutely clear, declarations are readily used.

Critiquing the Affidavit
An affidavit can inconvenience a witness because of the requirement that the witness be sworn and the written document notarized. It also incurs a notary fee, at the minimum. Some courts are turning to declarations under penalty of perjury as substitutes for affidavits because of the efficiency of these statements and their efficacy in forcing people to tell the truth.

The Other Statement
Alongside affidavits and declarations, depositions are often used to take the statements of witnesses. Depositions differ specifically in one way from affidavits: They allow for cross-examination. Depositions are recorded by the court reporter and become written transcripts that can be used in court. The witness is sworn in before making a deposition and is considered under oath, regardless of whether the deposition takes place in a courtroom.


Unless GW also gave a sworn statement "under penalty of perjury" in support of his statement, it's just his unsworn version of events IMO. But I'm not a lawyer and don't play one on TV.
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
33827 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:34 pm to
Twitter is blowing up with reporters saying all of this is sketchy. I fricking love it

quote:

This case raises serious questions re: NFL's conduct in this investigation. The kind of stuff that could put NFL in serious legal trouble.


quote:

@SportsLawGuy Plus, according to Peter Ginsberg, per @AlbertBreer, the NFL has its own documents which contradict Williams' affidavit.


quote:

@sportsJC16 @AlbertBreer Transcript of first court hearing contradicts Williams' declaration.


quote:

@SportsLawGuy @albertbreer that's unreal. What a mess. Roger better cut his losses here because it really gets ugly.


lets kill Goodell's head
This post was edited on 9/17/12 at 7:37 pm
Posted by poe tay toes
Member since Jan 2012
326 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:35 pm to
the line above the sig states "...I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct."

just looking for clarification from kclsufan

edit: kclsufan preemptively delivers
This post was edited on 9/17/12 at 7:38 pm
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram