- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NFL General Managers ranked worst to first
Posted on 4/18/16 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 4/18/16 at 6:31 pm
Loomis ranked 25th.
Generous, IMO.
NFL General Managers
Edited for spelling
Generous, IMO.
NFL General Managers
Edited for spelling
This post was edited on 4/18/16 at 6:34 pm
Posted on 4/18/16 at 6:36 pm to VetteGuy
I'll ask
What GM's would you put ahead of him?
Dimitroff Reeves and Baalke stir your soul? I don't have them higher than Loomis fwiw
What GM's would you put ahead of him?
Dimitroff Reeves and Baalke stir your soul? I don't have them higher than Loomis fwiw
Posted on 4/18/16 at 6:40 pm to VetteGuy
I didn't realize MSN was still around
That takes me back
That takes me back
Posted on 4/18/16 at 6:45 pm to goatmilker
The guy at Tennessee that just raped the Rams.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 6:50 pm to VetteGuy
Rams move reminded me of when we needed a jolt and the franchise was I think at a all time low.
We got Reggie and it helped us come back for a lot of reasons.
Better be good for the titans and may be good for the rams.
We got Reggie and it helped us come back for a lot of reasons.
Better be good for the titans and may be good for the rams.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 6:53 pm to goatmilker
I'm glad they shaked things up a bit
This post was edited on 4/18/16 at 6:54 pm
Posted on 4/18/16 at 7:01 pm to VetteGuy
quote:
The guy that just raped the Rams.
I wouldn't do that personally, but you have to give the guy credit for accomplishing the task.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 7:08 pm to VetteGuy
1. Our defense is not mediocre. Even if they want to be.
2. Drew was a top 5 QB a year ago with only Cooks as a respectable NFL talent to throw to and his worst Saint OL ever to protect him. AR and Luck had better talent around them and did worse.
Dumb article.
2. Drew was a top 5 QB a year ago with only Cooks as a respectable NFL talent to throw to and his worst Saint OL ever to protect him. AR and Luck had better talent around them and did worse.
Dumb article.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 7:21 pm to partywiththelombardi
I have to remember not to post any negative Saints information on this board, even if it is factual.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 7:31 pm to VetteGuy
Loomis isn't a good GM. The reasons stated are wrong. Therefore article sucks.
They could have brought up dead money, bad drafts, bad signings, not firing position coaches, losing talented players, etc
Mediocre D and Bad/Awful D are different things
Best years behind Drew and purge the roster entirely when Brees had a great year is all around retarded too.
They could have brought up dead money, bad drafts, bad signings, not firing position coaches, losing talented players, etc
Mediocre D and Bad/Awful D are different things
Best years behind Drew and purge the roster entirely when Brees had a great year is all around retarded too.
This post was edited on 4/18/16 at 7:35 pm
Posted on 4/18/16 at 7:39 pm to partywiththelombardi
quote:All this. This dude's depth of knowledge of the team seems to be he heard Mike and Mike talk about us for a couple minutes one morning.
oomis isn't a good GM. The reasons stated are wrong. Therefore article sucks.
They could have brought up dead money, bad drafts, bad signings, not firing position coaches, losing talented players, etc
Mediocre D and Bad/Awful D are different things
Best years behind Drew and purge the roster entirely when Brees had a great year is all around retarded too.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 8:03 pm to partywiththelombardi
It was just a quick thumbnail and wasn't really a specific article about Loomis.
Drew may have very well have some good years ahead, but obviously his prime is past.
Drew may have very well have some good years ahead, but obviously his prime is past.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 8:19 pm to VetteGuy
Drew's "Good" years are still ROH numbers compared to every other QB we ever had and HOF numbers to most other QB seasons.
If he didn't miss a game last year he would have thrown for over 5000 yards for the 5th time in NFL history with Cooks, Snead, and Watson...
In 2014 he missed that mark again by 48 yards.
His good year stats are actually pretty identical to his prime stats if you look at them.
If he didn't miss a game last year he would have thrown for over 5000 yards for the 5th time in NFL history with Cooks, Snead, and Watson...
In 2014 he missed that mark again by 48 yards.
His good year stats are actually pretty identical to his prime stats if you look at them.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 8:50 pm to VetteGuy
25 seems pretty high for him. Maybe he can earn that ranking this season.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 9:23 pm to partywiththelombardi
I don't disagree, but to expect him to have many more years like that is whistling in the dark.
Posted on 4/18/16 at 11:17 pm to VetteGuy
No way signing Byrd in 2014 was the worst move. It's not good yet certainly and may still pay off but the worst? C'mon. Save that for Junior and his $20 mil. A close second would be Browner.
Posted on 4/19/16 at 11:33 am to VetteGuy
About right, terrible Gm getting a proper ranking.
But but back in 2009 I know
But but back in 2009 I know
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News