- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jason Verrett & Jarvis Landry...What could have been...
Posted on 11/14/15 at 1:39 am to LosLobos111
Posted on 11/14/15 at 1:39 am to LosLobos111
I don't think you've been watching any games. He's had 2 good games and its bc of Bree's
1
Posted on 11/14/15 at 9:32 am to Jizzamo311
I wanted verrett. But he had an injury riddled rookie season and haven't really heard much from him since. Not sure if that's good or bad considering he's a CB.
The 2014 draft was historically one of the worst for the saints
The 2015 draft is looking to be one of the best
Things are looking up
The 2014 draft was historically one of the worst for the saints
The 2015 draft is looking to be one of the best
Things are looking up
Posted on 11/15/15 at 12:52 pm to Biggmatt78
Derp derp
5 TDs in the past 3 games
5 TDs in the past 3 games
Posted on 11/15/15 at 10:13 pm to TigerBait1127
cooks 5 for 98 2 TDs 19Ypc
landry 7 for 52 1 lucky TD and 7.4 ypc
landry 7 for 52 1 lucky TD and 7.4 ypc
Posted on 11/15/15 at 10:17 pm to Lester Earl
While the stats are correct, and Cooks had a better day today, why do you list Landry's to as "lucky"? It's not Landry's fault the ball was tipped at the LOS, and if he wasn't tipped he was open and may have had a clean catch. After the tip, he did a fine job of making a play on a free ball. Seems like a cheap shot to me.
Posted on 11/15/15 at 10:21 pm to Choupique19
because it was lucky
Posted on 11/16/15 at 1:54 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
cooks 5 for 98 2 TDs 19Ypc
landry 7 for 52 1 lucky TD and 7.4 ypc
you serious? Should i go back and post every time landry had a better game than cooks. I should. you would look fairly dumb...
Posted on 11/16/15 at 1:58 pm to deNYEd
quote:
Should i go back and post every time landry had a better game than cooks. I should. you would look fairly dumb...
Would have to go back about 5-6 weeks
Posted on 11/16/15 at 1:58 pm to deNYEd
You already think a 10ypc is good because he makes a lot of 3yd catches. So I'm not sure what your criteria is, but please do it
Posted on 11/16/15 at 2:00 pm to TigerBait1127
yea and then a streak of like every single game
Posted on 11/16/15 at 2:00 pm to Lester Earl
I think the 5 TDs over the past 3 weeks should speak for itself at this point
Let's just ignore the whole #1 corner situation too.
quote:
yea and then a streak of like every single game
Let's just ignore the whole #1 corner situation too.
This post was edited on 11/16/15 at 2:03 pm
Posted on 11/16/15 at 2:07 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
You already think a 10ypc is good because he makes a lot of 3yd catches. So I'm not sure what your criteria is, but please do it
Jarvis plays for one of most inconsistent qbs in the league. Do you even watch the games? Its obvious you do not. Jarvis is 10x more important for his team. He is a Miami fan favorite and rightfully so. Tremendous special teams player, tough arse nails, and sure handed as it gets. Very rarely does tannehil hit him in stride and catches balls with receivers draped over him regularly on underneath routes. Now watching cooks i see a receiever with elite speed....and im about done. I've watched him short arm passes and miss blocks. If jarvis played with brees this would not even be a conversation.
Posted on 11/16/15 at 2:09 pm to TigerBait1127
Most all would agree that outside of the last few games cooks has been extremely underwhelming for our 1st Rd pick.
Posted on 11/16/15 at 2:11 pm to deNYEd
quote:
Most all would agree that outside of the last few games cooks has been extremely underwhelming for our 1st Rd pick.
Yes, most would agree with that since he missed the 2nd half of his rookie campaign and our QB was injured early in the season.
Most would also agree that Cooks has emerged as a damn fine threat at this point too.
But yea, take out the current 3-5 game stretch he's having in his second year to try and support your argument. That is logical
15th in yards for WRs
8th in TDs for WRs
This post was edited on 11/16/15 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 11/16/15 at 2:15 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
But yea, take out the current 3-5 game stretch he's having in his second year to try and support your argument. That is logical
yea bc given the rest of resume it's nothing more than an anomaly. Ok thats a reach but honestly wtf do you expect from the "#1 receiver" on the best offense with unusually average receivers?!
cooks is just the product of being the smartest kid on the fastest short bus
This post was edited on 11/16/15 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 11/16/15 at 2:18 pm to deNYEd
quote:
yea bc given the rest of resume it's nothing more than an anomaly.
He's averaging 81 yards/game, 1 TD/game, and 16.2 ypc over the past 6 games
And anomaly? He's only played in around 20 games so far with half coming in his rookie season.
So yea, trying to ignore the most current 25% sample size is absolutely idiotic
quote:
Ok thats a reach but honestly wtf do you expect from the "#1 receiver" on the best offense with unusually average receivers?!
Colston was pretty damn good and got around 80 ypg. That was with a much better offense and oline too
Your arguments are laughable.
Basically, what you're saying now is even if he does play well and produces, it doesn't matter because of our offense. I guess it doesn't matter that he had our only 2 tds yesterday
This post was edited on 11/16/15 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 11/16/15 at 2:23 pm to TigerBait1127
cooks avg's more than antonio brown when he doesn't have big ben. So, by you logic cooks>antonio brown...no?
Posted on 11/16/15 at 2:25 pm to deNYEd
Nope. Not my logic at all actually
Try again
How about matthews>landry? Same qb and all
Try again
How about matthews>landry? Same qb and all
This post was edited on 11/16/15 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 11/16/15 at 2:27 pm to TigerBait1127
you and lester keep giving me stat sheets to attempt to prove your point. Doesn't take a fricking stat sheet to see that jarvis has been a better value than cooks thus far.
Posted on 11/16/15 at 2:28 pm to deNYEd
Better value or better? Let's try to stick to one argument here
Matthews > Landry? Somehow matthews averages 15 ypc with the same qb
By your logic, brown only produces because of big ben. Yadayadayada
Matthews > Landry? Somehow matthews averages 15 ypc with the same qb
By your logic, brown only produces because of big ben. Yadayadayada
This post was edited on 11/16/15 at 2:30 pm
Page 9 of 10
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News