Started By
Message

Derek Barnett or Reuben Foster?

Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:35 pm
Posted by PhillyTiger90
Member since Dec 2015
10666 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:35 pm
Or other?
Posted by TigahJay
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2015
10545 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:37 pm to
Not foster
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
32856 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:39 pm to
Barnett won't be there. Allen and Garrett won't be there either. Foster may be there. Probably looking at Jabrill Peppers or Zach Cunningham at best though.
Posted by rsylve
Terrytown, LA
Member since Feb 2013
3775 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:40 pm to
No shot at Barnett
Posted by Tigers2010
Member since Nov 2008
8802 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:40 pm to
Foster or Cunningham
Posted by tigerterrace
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Sep 2016
3393 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:43 pm to
Foster is one of the dumbest individuals that you would ever be around.

Believe me I know people that went to High school with him and I know people that were there for his 2nd and 3rd attempts at the ACT and I would bet my left "nut" that he did not take the 4th attempt himself.

Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38369 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:50 pm to
Nobody is drafting him to teach physics, his instincts and ability are off the charts
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38369 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

Jabrill Peppers


will be a terrible pick by the franchise that takes him in the first
Posted by Tigers2010
Member since Nov 2008
8802 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 4:52 pm to
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
32856 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:11 pm to
quote:


quote:

Jabrill Peppers



will be a terrible pick by the franchise that takes him in the first



Why do you say that? He could be Shaq Thompson/Thomas David type LBer or Palumalu type SS.
Posted by alabamabuckeye
Member since Jun 2010
22206 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

Foster is one of the dumbest individuals that you would ever be around.


I had no idea the Saints only drafted Rhodes Scholars.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115394 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:17 pm to
Tim Williams
Posted by Tigerclassof19
Member since Mar 2015
861 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:18 pm to
I saw a few mock drafts with Barnett going in the 20-25 range and I died laughing
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38369 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

Why do you say that? He could be Shaq Thompson/Thomas David type LBer or Palumalu type SS.



he's 205 pounds and doesn't really have a nose for the football. He had 66 tackles this year and has 1 career interception. Those guys you just named were tackling machines in college. There are quite a few cornerbacks bigger than him in the league right now. Basically he doesn't have the ability to be elite in coverage and doesn't have the size and strength to be elite in the box.
Posted by PhillyTiger90
Member since Dec 2015
10666 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 5:56 pm to
You can look at my post history I was very high on Peppers not too long ago. Then I saw him bitch out of the bowl game with a "hamstring". Seems to have diva written all over him

If Barnett doesn't fall id be ecstatic with Foster or T-Williams
Posted by GMoney2600
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
14088 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 10:54 pm to
Barnett or trade down imo. Still a lot of time to go, but that's my preference as of right now. I'd like Allen, but we have no shot at him. At least there is a small chance that Barnett falls to #11.

I'd rather not draft a CB at #11, & I like Foster's size & athleticism...but not 100% sold on him yet. I guess that could change with time though.

I want no part of Tim Williams at #11...that would piss me off. He might end up being a great pass rusher, but I hope we go another direction. Don't like Peppers at #11 either...great talent, but a lot of question marks. We shouldn't take high upside guys with question marks at pick #11.

You're right though. Barnett & Foster seem to be the 2 most logical targets at #11 as of right now.
This post was edited on 1/1/17 at 11:03 pm
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33679 posts
Posted on 1/1/17 at 11:23 pm to
i'd rather a D-lineman myself but wouldn't be disappointed with Foster.

Front seven on defense.. you can't go wrong IMO.
Posted by uptowntiger84
uptown
Member since Jul 2011
3882 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:02 am to
Barnett would be a steal at 11. Him opposite of cam with rankins and possibly fairley. That would be a hell of a defensive front 4.
This post was edited on 1/2/17 at 2:04 am
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31461 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:16 am to
I wouldn't be mad at Foster or Cunningham. I think they can sign a DE opposite of Cam in FA.


Regardless, I want the Saints to target mostly, if not anything but defense. I mean shite, why wouldn't you? The only position on offense that is worrisome is Evans.


1st Round: LB
2nd Round: LB/CB
3rd round: DE/DT/CB
4th round: OL
Posted by LSU1SLU
Member since Mar 2013
7056 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:44 am to
Barnett. Some have him going lower than 11 but i dont see how. I would be estatic. We have to go front 7 imo. Tabor wont be there. Dont like anybody else in secondary other than adams that early but we dont need safety pick right there

Love the draft this year way more than last season. A ton of pass rushers and Line backers
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram