Started By
Message

Bill Barnwell of ESPN doesn't really like the Saints offseason moves...

Posted on 5/18/16 at 11:38 am
Posted by GFunk
Denham Springs
Member since Feb 2011
14966 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 11:38 am
LINK

The link discusses the entire division, but here are some highlights from Barnwell's review of New Orleans.

On signing Colby Fleener to a larger than necessary contract when it seems that TE can be a bit of a plug-and-play position for the Payton/Brees offense...and how that relates to a familiar error...

quote:

Fleener will be productive and post his best career numbers with the Saints, but that's not the issue. The Saints can plug a lot of tight ends into this offense and produce big numbers. They can't do the same on defense, where they've been a mess for years now. I'm not sure spending the money they've assigned to Fleener on a cornerback or edge rusher would have solved the Saints' problems, but it would have at least addressed an issue of concern. Tight end should be one of the last things the Saints are worrying about. It's reminiscent of the 2015 offseason, when they were facing down a terrible defense and decided to double down on running backs by re-signing Mark Ingram and adding C.J. Spiller.


On the failure to free up cap space by extending Brees...

quote:

Brees is still playing at a high level and worth a top-dollar quarterback contract, but the Saints badly needed to create short-term cap space by giving Brees an extension. Brees' side knows this, of course, which is why they have all the leverage in carving out the terms of a deal. That goes even further when you remember that the Saints really can't franchise Brees next year, given that his cap hit would rise even more dramatically. It speaks to how mismanaged the Saints' cap is that they find themselves in this situation and weren't able to throw enough money at a Hall of Fame quarterback to make a deal happen before free agency began.


In discussing how the Saints went all in for Josh Norman...

quote:

This is an organization that, on a daily basis, is regretting the Jairus Byrd signing, which was made under similar circumstances. The Saints would have needed to give Norman a massive second-year roster bonus and convert that to a signing bonus to fit Norman under their cap, a move that has bit them twice with Byrd and Junior Galette. The time to extend Brees to create cap space was February, not April.

At the end of the day, the Saints seem to be in denial about their problems. They repeat, or at least attempt to repeat, the same mistakes over and over. The result has been a team that is wasting the final years of one of the great quarterbacks in football. It's fascinating to see the contrast between the Saints and Panthers. Carolina made it to the Super Bowl and felt like it wasn't one player away from winning. New Orleans finished 7-9 for the second consecutive season and felt sure it was.


Why does Barnwell dislike the moves on offense so much, along with the failure to extend Breesus and provide cap relief? From elsewhere in the article I thought this was an incredible stat re: how opposing QB's did against the Saints Defense last year...

quote:

The Saints were one of the worst defenses in football history last season. You don't need me to tell you that, but I'm going to do so anyway. It's not just that they were last in DVOA. The Bears, who were 31st in defensive DVOA, were closer to the Patriots in 12th place than they were to the Saints in 32nd. New Orleans allowed a 78.8 QBR to opposing quarterbacks, which means the average passer against the Saints would have been the second-best quarterback in football.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278137 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 11:39 am to
quote:

At the end of the day, the Saints seem to be in denial about their problems. They repeat, or at least attempt to repeat, the same mistakes over and over



we call this Loomising, 'round here
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28062 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 11:43 am to
This thread will not go well here.




Signing unwanted veteran defensive players and expecting dramatic improvement in their production is wishing upon a star.
Posted by GFunk
Denham Springs
Member since Feb 2011
14966 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 11:45 am to
quote:

VetteGuy
quote:

This thread will not go well here.


The stat about the opponent's QBR rating versus the Saints is mind-blowing. We literally made every QB we played against look like a Top 2 QB in the NFL when they played us.

Pathetic.
Posted by Let Me Take A Selfie
Member since Aug 2014
2622 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 11:49 am to
The Brees situation is embarrassing.

Signing Laurinaitis + Craig Robertson was dumb.

Going all-in on Josh Norman was dumb.

Nick Fairley deal was solid.

Draft was also solid.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115343 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 11:50 am to
Barnwell's podcast after the draft discussing all team's offseason, they literally laughed at us and had no further discussion. Just laughed, said "oh Saints, they suck" and moved on. All other teams got a few minutes of conversation, even the shittiest of franchises.

Barnwell has made no bones for several years how much he hates the way Loomis operates the Saints and Pelicans. No matter what we do, Barnwell was going to hate it.

Posted by lsutigers1992
Member since Mar 2006
25317 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 11:52 am to
quote:

Why does Barnwell dislike the moves on offense so much, along with the failure to extend Breesus and provide cap relief?


You pretty much already summed it up.

Tight end should be one of the last things the Saints are worrying about. It's reminiscent of the 2015 offseason, when they were facing down a terrible defense and decided to double down on running backs by re-signing Mark Ingram and adding C.J. Spiller.

Not to mention that Drew Brees has been shattering passing records on this team for a decade now, and has literally never had a Pro Bowl WR to throw to? Colston was good, but was never a superstar, and he played on flat tires for almost 3 years.

He backs up his criticism with some pretty solid examples, if you ask me.
This post was edited on 5/18/16 at 11:53 am
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166075 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 11:55 am to
specks of validity here and there in his arguments but a lot of it is a very short sighted way of viewing things not in entirety. It's easy to criticize not doing A if you don't know why they didn't do A or what's planned for B and C. Yes the Byrd signing is obviously not a good signing at this point but whatever, we're living with it for another year and will move on. He may not be a total bumb this year. Galette was just horrible with the turn of thug events. Saints should have seen that coming.
Posted by Breesy9
Member since May 2016
197 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Not to mention that Drew Brees has been shattering passing records on this team for a decade now, and has literally never had a Pro Bowl WR to throw to? Colston was good, but was never a superstar, and he played on flat tires for almost 3 years.



And Colston is gone now, and, like you said, was already fading. We need a replacement. Fleener will be much more of a WR to us than just a TE

And Colston was every much a pro bowl talent and deserving of that honor.

Our offense was at its best with Colston, Devery, Meachem and Graham/Shockey. Our overall totals may have been good the last few years, but the offense wasn't near the elite level it once was.
This post was edited on 5/18/16 at 11:59 am
Posted by GFunk
Denham Springs
Member since Feb 2011
14966 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 11:59 am to
quote:

Chad504boy
quote:

Yes the Byrd signing is obviously not a good signing at this point but whatever, we're living with it for another year and will move on.


I was told once that a conjunction used in a sentence like that oftentimes serves to negate everything that came before it.

In the NFL, if the goal or vision is to compete for world championships, shrugging your shoulders and just saying, "oh well," to a staggeringly bad contract like Byrd's isn't something you can do if you want to achieve your goal or realize your vision.

You can't have Drew Brees' contract coupled with two monster, zombie contracts for players that either A.) Didn't do sh!t for you (Gallette) or B.) are playing like they should be in the Arena League (Byrd).

That much money being spent, and then the Fleener money being seemingly misspent, is going to prevent you from contending and winning world championships.

It's ironic that you mention that they don't have context or are being shortsighted. Yet you're here trying to dismiss one of the single biggest issues that has stood in the way of this franchise and returning to being competitive with words like, "whatever".
This post was edited on 5/18/16 at 12:01 pm
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56331 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Fleener will be productive and post his best career numbers with the Saints, but that's not the issue. The Saints can plug a lot of tight ends into this offense and produce big numbers. They can't do the same on defense, where they've been a mess for years now. I'm not sure spending the money they've assigned to Fleener on a cornerback or edge rusher would have solved the Saints' problems, but it would have at least addressed an issue of concern. Tight end should be one of the last things the Saints are worrying about. It's reminiscent of the 2015 offseason, when they were facing down a terrible defense and decided to double down on running backs by re-signing Mark Ingram and adding C.J. Spiller.


I can't disagree with this

quote:

Brees is still playing at a high level and worth a top-dollar quarterback contract, but the Saints badly needed to create short-term cap space by giving Brees an extension. Brees' side knows this, of course, which is why they have all the leverage in carving out the terms of a deal. That goes even further when you remember that the Saints really can't franchise Brees next year, given that his cap hit would rise even more dramatically. It speaks to how mismanaged the Saints' cap is that they find themselves in this situation and weren't able to throw enough money at a Hall of Fame quarterback to make a deal happen before free agency began.


I cant' fault the Saints for this too much. Brees is wanting top dollar. That, unfortunately, takes time to negotiate. The benefit to extending Brees is really over for this year. At this point, it's about getting Brees on a long term contract more than freeing up cap space.

quote:

This is an organization that, on a daily basis, is regretting the Jairus Byrd signing, which was made under similar circumstances. The Saints would have needed to give Norman a massive second-year roster bonus and convert that to a signing bonus to fit Norman under their cap, a move that has bit them twice with Byrd and Junior Galette. The time to extend Brees to create cap space was February, not April.

At the end of the day, the Saints seem to be in denial about their problems. They repeat, or at least attempt to repeat, the same mistakes over and over. The result has been a team that is wasting the final years of one of the great quarterbacks in football. It's fascinating to see the contrast between the Saints and Panthers. Carolina made it to the Super Bowl and felt like it wasn't one player away from winning. New Orleans finished 7-9 for the second consecutive season and felt sure it was.


Meh. The biggest issue with Byrd is that he sucks. It's not the money that was paid or the mechanism for fitting the deal into the available cap. It's that their ability to recognize how much of his success was based on a scheme that fit him vs natural ability. And, of course the injuries hurt.

If the staff thinks Norman was a difference maker, they absolutely needed to try and make that deal. Those opportunities don't come along every day.

quote:

The Saints were one of the worst defenses in football history last season. You don't need me to tell you that, but I'm going to do so anyway. It's not just that they were last in DVOA. The Bears, who were 31st in defensive DVOA, were closer to the Patriots in 12th place than they were to the Saints in 32nd. New Orleans allowed a 78.8 QBR to opposing quarterbacks, which means the average passer against the Saints would have been the second-best quarterback in football.


All true.
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
16914 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 12:09 pm to
I disagree with the Fleener criticism. When the Saints made that move our WR's and TE's were extremely thin on proven talent and were undersized. Even now, we're still banking on a rookie WR to bolster our receiving corps with some size.

And it's not like we had some other great, sure thing defensive player all lined up and ready to be signed that Fleener took off the board. Now the Norman pursuit I absolutely don't understand.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166075 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

In the NFL, if the goal or vision is to compete for world championships, shrugging your shoulders and just saying, "oh well," to a staggeringly bad contract like Byrd's isn't something you can do if you want to achieve your goal or realize your vision.

You can't have Drew Brees' contract coupled with two monster, zombie contracts for players that either A.) Didn't do sh!t for you (Gallette) or B.) are playing like they should be in the Arena League (Byrd).

That much money being spent, and then the Fleener money being seemingly misspent, is going to prevent you from contending and winning world championships.

It's ironic that you mention that they don't have context or are being shortsighted. Yet you're here trying to dismiss one of the single biggest issues that has stood in the way of this franchise and returning to being competitive with words like, "whatever".



Byrd is our starting safety, we just drafted a future replacement, Saints will take the field in August and compete. What the frick else do you want them to do? Turn in their competition card because byrd contract didn't play out too well mostly cause of his health and fluctuating coordinators. You say i'm ignoring it but what the frick do you want to be done about it?
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71952 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 12:12 pm to
quote:


Barnwell has made no bones for several years how much he hates the way Loomis operates the Saints and Pelicans. No matter what we do, Barnwell was going to hate it.



With good reason. If you (not you you) look at in from an unbiased perspective, both teams are trending in a downward direction, all while possessing top 5 players in both sports.

And Vegas has our win total at 7. So we as a fanbase can love the offseason moves and have hope (every year we have Brees will bring this), but in the end, we arent even looked at as a playoff team.
Posted by lacajun069
franklinton
Member since Sep 2008
2086 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 12:21 pm to
The last time I looked it was Mickey Loomis and Shawn Payton who are paid to make the decision on draft choice and free agents not some hack reporter at ESPN. He is entitled to his option but it is not his job to build a football team. He has nothing to loose and he can build a football team like the rest of us a mature GM'S ON PAPER ONLY. Let those who jobs are on the line decided what is best for the Saints make the
D.ecisions. We can judge how successful those decisions are after the season is over.
Posted by LSUZombie
A Cemetery Near You
Member since Apr 2008
28872 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 12:24 pm to
Eh, winning cures everything. If the Saints can field the same offense with a defense that can make stops occasionally and force a turnover here and there, they probably win the division.

Like someone else said, I found his reasons very short-sighted and it's really hard for me to care what a staff writer for ESPN has to say after doing a google search of each team and then offering his "expert" take.
Posted by Breesy9
Member since May 2016
197 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

was told once that a conjunction used in a sentence like that oftentimes serves to negate everything that came before it.





quote:

In the NFL, if the goal or vision is to compete for world championships, shrugging your shoulders and just saying, "oh well," to a staggeringly bad contract like Byrd's isn't something you can do if you want to achieve your goal or realize your vision. 


We drafted a safety. What else would you have them do?

quote:

and then the Fleener money being seemingly misspent, is going to prevent you from contending and winning world championships. 


Seemingly misspent? He hasn't even played a down yet.
Posted by NamariTiger
Flower Mound, Texas
Member since Jun 2014
17746 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 12:29 pm to
Billy can stfu. That's what I'd stfu..STFU
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115343 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

With good reason


I don't necessarily disagree. I'm just saying that Barnwell has a pretty particular bias in this regard and it really doesn't matter what Loomis does at this point. He's not going to like it.
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
76628 posts
Posted on 5/18/16 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

we call this Loomising


It's much more catchy than "Yes, whatever you want, Seaning"
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram